scholarly journals P213 Positive drivers and potential barriers to implementation of hospital at home selected by low risk decaf score

Thorax ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A201.1-A201
Author(s):  
L Dismore ◽  
C Echevarria ◽  
A Van-Wersch ◽  
AJ Simpson ◽  
GJ Gibson ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e026609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorelle Louise Dismore ◽  
Carlos Echevarria ◽  
Anna van Wersch ◽  
John Gibson ◽  
Stephen Bourke

ObjectiveHospital at home (HAH) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation selected by low-risk Dyspnoea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidaemia and atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) score is clinical and cost-effective; DECAF is a prognostic score indicating risk of mortality. Up to 50% of admitted patients are suitable, a much larger proportion than earlier services. Introduction of new models of care is challenging, but may be facilitated by informed engagement with stakeholders. This qualitative study sought to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of HAH.DesignSemistructured interviews, data were analysed using thematic-construct analysis.SettingInterviews were conducted within patients’ homes and hospitals in North East England.Participants89 participants were interviewees; 44 patients, 15 carers, 15 physicians, 11 specialist nurses and 4 managers.ResultsFacilitators include the following: (1) availability of home comforts and maintaining independence (with positive influences on perceived rate of recovery, sleep quality and convenience for friends, family and carers) and (2) confidence in the continuity of HAH care. Barriers include the following: (1) fear of being alone at home; (2) privacy issues and not wanting visitors and (3) resistance to change. Clinician concerns occasionally delayed return home, principally during the early phase of the trial. Nurses cited higher workload and greater responsibility, but with additional resource and training; overall, they viewed HAH positively. Operational concerns included keeping medical records in a patient’s home and inability to capture activity within current payment systems.ConclusionHAH selected by DECAF was preferred to inpatient care by most patients and their families. Implementation in other hospitals will require education, training and service planning, tailored to overcome the identified barriers.Trial registration numberISRCTN29082260.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham A. Brody ◽  
Alicia I. Arbaje ◽  
Linda V. DeCherrie ◽  
Alex D. Federman ◽  
Bruce Leff ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
J GUILLAMONT ◽  
A SOLE ◽  
S GONZALEZ ◽  
A PEREZITURRIAGA ◽  
C DAVILA ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Helena Ross ◽  
Ryan Dritz ◽  
Barbara Morano ◽  
Sara Lubetsky ◽  
Pamela Saenger ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 11-13
Author(s):  
Michael Ewers
Keyword(s):  

EinleitungPatienten in kritischen Gesundheitssituationen und solche mit therapeutisch-technischem Unterstützungsbedarf sollen auch in Deutschland vermehrt im häuslichen Umfeld versorgt werden. Die Voraussetzungen der als High-Tech Home Care (HTHC) oder Hospital-at-Home (H@H) international bekannten Versorgungsform und die mit dem Transfer der Medizintechnik von der Intensivstation ins Wohnzimmer verbundenen (un-)erwünschten Effekte – besonders für die Nutzer – erfahren aber noch selten die notwendige Aufmerksamkeit.


2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda V. DeCherrie ◽  
Ania Wajnberg ◽  
Tacara Soones ◽  
Christian Escobar ◽  
Elisse Catalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document