Chapter 18. Polynomial Roots and Colleague Matrices

Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (563) ◽  
pp. 253-262
Author(s):  
R. W. D. Nickalls

This Article explores how root multiplicity and polynomial degree influence the structure of the roots of a univariant polynomial. After setting up the notation, we draw upon a result derived in [1], and show that all polynomial roots have a common underlying structure comprising just five parameters. Finally we present some examples involving the lower polynomials.


2018 ◽  
Vol 539 ◽  
pp. 94-116
Author(s):  
Kevin N. Vander Meulen ◽  
Trevor Vanderwoerd

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-394
Author(s):  
Tucker McElroy

Abstract Methodology for seasonality diagnostics is extremely important for statistical agencies, because such tools are necessary for making decisions whether to seasonally adjust a given series, and whether such an adjustment is adequate. This methodology must be statistical, in order to furnish quantification of Type I and II errors, and also to provide understanding about the requisite assumptions. We connect the concept of seasonality to a mathematical definition regarding the oscillatory character of the moving average (MA) representation coefficients, and define a new seasonality diagnostic based on autoregressive (AR) roots. The diagnostic is able to assess different forms of seasonality: dynamic versus stable, of arbitrary seasonal periods, for both raw data and seasonally adjusted data. An extension of the AR diagnostic to an MA diagnostic allows for the detection of over-adjustment. Joint asymptotic results are provided for the diagnostics as they are applied to multiple seasonal frequencies, allowing for a global test of seasonality. We illustrate the method through simulation studies and several empirical examples.


Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Gdawiec ◽  
Wiesław Kotarski ◽  
Agnieszka Lisowska

The aim of this paper is to investigate experimentally and to present visually the dynamics of the processes in which in the standard Newton’s root-finding method the classic derivative is replaced by the fractional Riemann–Liouville or Caputo derivatives. These processes applied to polynomials on the complex plane produce images showing basins of attractions for polynomial zeros or images representing the number of iterations required to obtain polynomial roots. These latter images were called by Kalantari as polynomiographs. We use both: the colouring by roots to present basins of attractions, and the colouring by iterations that reveal the speed of convergence and dynamic properties of processes visualised by polynomiographs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document