Use of parenteral nutrition in patients with advanced cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Soo ◽  
Leah Gramlich
Keyword(s):  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Intestinal Failure ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Northern Alberta

The purpose of this study is to describe patient-related variables in a cohort of advanced cancer patients (ACPs) enrolled in a home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program. This study reviewed the cohort of ACPs enrolled in the Northern Alberta Home Total Parenteral Nutrition Program (NAHTPNP). Thirty-eight ACPs received HPN during the study period, 24% of all patients admitted for PN. Of these, 27 (71%) were female. Mean age was 48.76 y (SD 13.8 y). Bowel obstruction was the most common indication for initiating HPN (84%, 32) and ovarian cancer was the most common malignancy (34%, 13). Patients who began HPN with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of greater than 50 (median of 70) were found to have a longer duration of life (median: 6 months) compared with patients who began HPN with a KPS of 50 or below (median = 50; median 3 months; p = 0.01; two-tailed). There was no difference in survival between malignancy type (p = NS). Advanced cancer is the fastest growing indication for enrollment in the HPN program. ACP demonstrated a 3% average annual increase proportionate to all indications for HPN starts, accounting for 7%–48% of HPN starts from 1999–2006. HPN is an increasingly used therapy for patients with advanced cancer, most commonly for intestinal failure in the setting of bowel obstruction. Initiation of HPN at a higher KPS was associated with a longer duration of life. Further studies are needed to validate the use of TPN in end-stage cancer patients.

scholarly journals Palliative Care and COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Study of Factors Associated With Infection and Death at an Oncological Palliative Care Reference Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912098696
Author(s):  
Livia Costa de Oliveira ◽  
Karla Santos da Costa Rosa ◽  
Ana Luísa Durante ◽  
Luciana de Oliveira Ramadas Rodrigues ◽  
Daianny Arrais de Oliveira da Cunha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background: Advanced cancer patients are part of a group likely to be more susceptible to COVID-19. Aims: To describe the profile of advanced cancer inpatients to an exclusive Palliative Care Unit (PCU) with the diagnosis of COVID-19, and to evaluate the factors associated with death in these cases. Design: Retrospective cohort study with data from advanced cancer inpatients to an exclusive PCU, from March to July 2020, with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Diagnostic of COVID-19 and death were the dependent variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed, with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: One hundred fifty-five patients were selected. The mean age was 60.9 (±13.4) years old and the most prevalent tumor type was breast (30.3%). Eighty-three (53.5%) patients had a diagnostic confirmation of COVID-19. Having diabetes mellitus (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-6.6) and having received chemotherapy in less than 30 days before admission (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.2-12.2) were associated factors to diagnosis of COVID-19. Among those infected, 81.9% died and, patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 30% (OR: 14.8; 95% CI 2.7-21.6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) >21.6mg/L (OR: 9.3; 95% CI 1.1-27.8), had a greater chance of achieving this outcome. Conclusion: Advanced cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy in less than 30 days before admission and who had diabetes mellitus were more likely to develop Coronavirus 2019 disease. Among the confirmed cases, those hospitalized with worse KPS and bigger CRP were more likely to die.

scholarly journals Home Artificial Nutrition in Advanced Cancer

1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (11) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loris Pironi ◽  
Enrico Ruggeri ◽  
Stephan Tanneberger ◽  
Stefano Giordani ◽  
Franco Pannuti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
At Home

Attitudes to home artificial nutrition (HAN) in cancer vary greatly from country to country. A 6-year prospective survey of the practice of HAN in advanced cancer patients applied by a hospital-at-home programme in an Italian health district was performed to estimate the utilization rate, to evaluate efficacy in preventing death from cachexia, maintaining patients at home without burdens and distress and improving patients' performance status, and to obtain information about costs. Patients were eligible for HAN when all the following were present: hypophagia; life expectancy 6 weeks or more, suitable patient and family circumstances; and verbal informed consent. From July 1990 to June 1996, 587 patients were evaluated; 164 were selected for HAN (135 enteral and 29 parenteral) and were followed until 31 December 1996. The incidence of HAN per million inhabitants was 18.4 in the first year of activity and 33.2–36.9 in subsequent years, being 4–10 times greater than rates reported by the Italian HAN registers. On 31 December 1996, 158 patients had died because of the disease and 6 were on treatment. Mean survival was 17.2 weeks for those on enteral nutrition and 12.2 weeks for those on parenteral nutrition. Prediction of survival was 72% accurate. 95 patients had undergone 155 readmissions to hospital, where they spent 15–23% of their survival time. Burdens due to HAN were well accepted by 124 patients, an annoyance or scarcely tolerable in the remainder. The frequency of major complications of parenteral nutrition was 0.67 per year for catheter sepsis and 0.16 per year for deep vein thrombosis. Karnofsky performance score increased in only 13 patients and body weight increased in 43. The fixed direct costs per patient-day (in European Currency Units) were 14.2 for the nutrition team, 18.2 for enteral nutrition and 61 for parenteral nutrition. The results indicate that definite entry criteria and local surveys are required for the correct use of HAN in advanced cancer patients, that HAN can be applied without causing additional burdens and distress, and that its costs are not higher than hospital costs.

Trajectories of performance status decline in advanced cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Ritchie ◽  
Amy Pickar Abernethy ◽  
Jean Kutner ◽  
Cari Levy ◽  
Sean O'Mahony ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Piecewise Linear ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Pragmatic Trial ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Palliative Care Setting

100 Background: Historically, functional decline is considered to occur steadily and inexorably in the last months of life, with a relatively steep trajectory compared to non-cancer patients (pts). As part of a trial evaluating the safety and clinical impact of discontinuing statin medications for patients in the palliative care setting, we recorded the performance status (PS) in 186 cancer patients regularly during their time on study and compared changes among those with differing baseline PS levels and between those with and without cancer. Methods: This was a multi-center, parallel-group, unblinded pragmatic trial. Eligibility included: age > 18; life expectancy between 1 month and 1 year, on a statin for ≥ 3 months for primary or secondary prevention, recent deterioration in PS and no recent active cardiovascular disease. Participants, randomized to either discontinue or continue statins, were followed monthly for up to 1 year. Outcomes included survival, cardiovascular events, and PS. PS was measured using the Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale and grouped into 4 categories: AKPS=70, 60; 50 and 0-40. The trajectory of PS decline for each group was modeled using a piecewise-linear function allowing for knots at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and separated out between those participants who died and did not die during their time on study. A mixed model was used allowing for a random intercept for each participant. Results: Among the 186 subjects whose primary diagnosis was cancer, 111 died; among 195 without cancer, 75 died. Those who did not die maintained a relatively flat trajectory of AKPS across 20 weeks; for those who did die, AKPS scores declined somewhat over 20 weeks but this decline was most remarkable among those with a starting AKPS of 0-40. Compared to noncancer patients who died during the study period, PS levels were higher at baseline and had initially greater rates of decline. Conclusions: For advanced cancer patients, PS declines are less dramatic than previous estimates have suggested except for those with AKPS 0-40, suggesting precipitous declines at the very end of life for those with higher initial AKPS. Compared to noncancer patients, PS decline is slightly steeper among cancer pts.

Clinical experience with oral methadone administration in the treatment of pain in 196 advanced cancer patients.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 2836-2842 ◽  
Author(s):  
F De Conno ◽  
L Groff ◽  
C Brunelli ◽  
E Zecca ◽  
V Ventafridda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
The Other ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Methadone ◽  
Analgesic Therapy

PURPOSE The aims of this study were to describe the analgesia, side effects, and dosage and the causes of suspension of treatment in a large sample of advanced cancer patients with pain after treatment with oral methadone from 7 to 90 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a retrospective study, data collected for 196 advanced cancer outpatients with moderate to severe pain treated at 8-hour intervals with oral methadone in solution form from February 1993 to February 1995 were analyzed at baseline (time 0) and then at 7, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 days. The following parameters were assessed: Karnofsky Performance Status, intensity of pain (using the Integrated Pain Score [IPS], intensity of pain, insomnia, drowsiness, confusion, dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and dyspnea (using the Therapy Impact Questionnaire [TIQ], mean daily dose of drug administered, and reasons for withdrawal from study. The period when pain was reduced by > or = 35% with respect to baseline was evaluated with the Palliation Index. The association of the degree of palliation of pain with the age of the patients, tumor site, analgesic treatment taken at baseline, and daily mean dose of methadone administered during the follow-up period was analyzed by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS A reduction in pain intensity with respect to baseline occurred at each analysis time, and in 55.1% of the patients the reduction during the follow-up period was > or = 35% according to the Palliation Index. The mean dose of oral methadone ranged from 14 mg at day 7 to 23.65 mg at day 90. There was an overall worsening of the other symptoms, but a high percentage of the patients reported an amelioration of insomnia with respect to baseline. There was a statistically significant association (P < .0001) between the Palliation Index and the analgesic therapy administered at baseline. Only 11.2% of the patients withdrew from the study due to analgesic inefficacy and 6.6% due to methadone-related side effects (10 patients with drowsiness and three with severe constipation. CONCLUSION Oral methadone administered every 8 hours was shown to be an appropriate analgesic therapy in the treatment of advanced cancer-related pain. The worsening of the other symptoms under study can be considered linked to the progression of the disease, and in fact, only a small percentage of the patients reported methadone-related side effects that warranted suspension of treatment. We consider oral methadone to be a useful analgesic therapy, and it should be considered in clinical practice for the treatment of cancer pain.

The Importance of a Home Care Program for Patients with Advanced Cancer Pain

1985 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Ventafridda ◽  
Marcello Tamburini ◽  
Silvana Selmi ◽  
Luigi Valera ◽  
Franco De Conno
Keyword(s):  
Home Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Sample Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quality Of Life Index

At the Pain Clinic of the National Cancer Institute of Milan, a special Home Care Program has been set up to assist advanced cancer patients with pain and their families during their remaining survival. The Home Care Unit comprises a team of physicians, nurse clinicians, psychologists and many volunteers who are active both in the hospital and at the patient's home. This entire operation provides a continuous relationship between the family, the patient and the Home Care Unit. This Home Care Program, which is one of a kind with other forms of treatment for advanced cancer patients (i.e. hospices), has produced interesting results. Out of a sample group of 50 patients, 33 were monitored at home by the Home Care Unit while 17 had their families to do the monitoring. Over a six-week period the following results were reported: a) Improvement of psycho-emotional factors such as anxiety, weakness and mood for both patients and their families who entered the Home Care Program. b) The Quality of Life Index remained unchanged for the sample group that entered the Home Care Program whereas it deteriorated for patients monitored by their families. c) A decrease in the Integrated Pain Score for both groups; however, results showed a statistically significant difference in favor of patients on the Home Care Program. d) The Performance Status decreased by very little over the study period, and there was little difference between the two groups. These results confirm the need for a Home Care Program which must go hand in hand with the Pain Clinic as an effective way to control Total Pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document