The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the lizard Anolis polylepis (Iguania): evidence from intraspecific variation in foraging behavior and diet

1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1238-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gad Perry
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Feeding Behavior ◽  
Rain Forest ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Costa Rican ◽  
Agonistic Interactions ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Food Items ◽  
Competing Hypotheses

Two main explanations, intraspecific niche divergence and sexual selection, have been proposed to explain the origin of sexual size dimorphism. To test these competing hypotheses I studied the ecology, feeding behavior, and diet of the lizard Anolis polylepis in a Costa Rican rain forest. Male A. polylepis were significantly larger and heavier than females but ate smaller food items and had lower stomach volumes, despite possessing longer and wider heads. Males were more sedentary than females or juveniles, chose higher perches, and were more likely to be involved in agonistic interactions. Diets of males, females, and juveniles were also significantly different taxonomically. These data are consistent with the sexual selection origin theory but not with an ecological one. Thus, observed dietary differences probably evolved once dimorphism had been attained through sexual selection.

scholarly journals Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in artiodactyls

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 792-797
Author(s):  
Marcelo H Cassini
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Group Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Selection For

Abstract Sexual size dimorphism is biased toward males in most mammalian species. The most common explanation is precopulatory intramale sexual selection. Large males win fights and mate more frequently. In artiodactyls, previous tests of this hypothesis consisted of interspecific correlations of sexual dimorphism with group size as a surrogate for the intensity of sexual selection (Is). However, group size is not a proper measure of sexual selection for several reasons as is largely recognized in other mammalian taxa. I conducted an interspecific test on the role of sexual selection in the evolution of sexual dimorphism using the variance in genetic paternity as a proxy for the Is. I reviewed the literature and found 17 studies that allowed estimating Is= V/(W2), where V and W are the variance and mean number of offspring per male, respectively. A phylogenetic generalized least squares analysis indicated that dimorphism (Wm/Wf) showed a significant positive regression with the intensity of sexual selection but not group size (multiple r2= 0.40; F3,17= 12.78, P = 0.002). This result suggests that sexual selection may have played a role in the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in Artiodactyla. An alternative hypothesis based on natural selection is discussed.

Latitudinal clines in sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism, and sex‐specific genetic dispersal during a poleward range expansion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Y. Dudaniec ◽  
Alexander R. Carey ◽  
Erik I. Svensson ◽  
Bengt Hansson ◽  
Chuan Ji Yong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Range Expansion ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Latitudinal Clines

scholarly journals Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 20210251
Author(s):  
Tim Janicke ◽  
Salomé Fromonteil
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bateman Gradient ◽  
Mixed Support ◽  
Evolutionary Force ◽  
Length Measurements

Sexual selection is often considered as a critical evolutionary force promoting sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in animals. However, empirical evidence for a positive relationship between sexual selection on males and male-biased SSD received mixed support depending on the studied taxonomic group and on the method used to quantify sexual selection. Here, we present a meta-analytic approach accounting for phylogenetic non-independence to test how standardized metrics of the opportunity and strength of pre-copulatory sexual selection relate to SSD across a broad range of animal taxa comprising up to 95 effect sizes from 59 species. We found that SSD based on length measurements was correlated with the sex difference in the opportunity for sexual selection but showed a weak and statistically non-significant relationship with the sex difference in the Bateman gradient. These findings suggest that pre-copulatory sexual selection plays a limited role for the evolution of SSD in a broad phylogenetic context.

scholarly journals Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism

2007 ◽  
Vol 274 (1628) ◽  
pp. 2971-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Dale ◽  
Peter O Dunn ◽  
Jordi Figuerola ◽  
Terje Lislevand ◽  
Tamás Székely ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Bird Species ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
Allometric Relationship ◽  
Rensch’S Rule ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Rensch's Rule ◽  
Clear Solution ◽  
General Explanation

In 1950, Rensch first described that in groups of related species, sexual size dimorphism is more pronounced in larger species. This widespread and fundamental allometric relationship is now commonly referred to as ‘Rensch's rule’. However, despite numerous recent studies, we still do not have a general explanation for this allometry. Here we report that patterns of allometry in over 5300 bird species demonstrate that Rensch's rule is driven by a correlated evolutionary change in females to directional sexual selection on males. First, in detailed multivariate analysis, the strength of sexual selection was, by far, the strongest predictor of allometry. This was found to be the case even after controlling for numerous potential confounding factors, such as overall size, degree of ornamentation, phylogenetic history and the range and degree of size dimorphism. Second, in groups where sexual selection is stronger in females, allometry consistently goes in the opposite direction to Rensch's rule. Taken together, these results provide the first clear solution to the long-standing evolutionary problem of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: sexual selection causes size dimorphism to correlate with species size.

Sexual size dimorphism in the viviparous caecilian amphibian Geotrypetes seraphini seraphini (Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae) including an updated overview of sexual dimorphism in caecilian amphibians

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Maerker ◽  
Sandy Reinhard ◽  
Peter Pogoda ◽  
Alexander Kupfer
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Body Length ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Molecular Ecology ◽  
Female Size ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Mating System Evolution ◽  
Accurate Comparison ◽  
Widespread Phenomenon

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) describing intersexual size differences of a given taxon is a widespread phenomenon in the animal kingdom. SSD plays a significant role in understanding life history and mating system evolution. The snakelike morphology of limbless caecilian amphibians lacking obvious secondary sexual characters (in contrast to frogs and salamanders) impedes an accurate comparison between sexes.Here, the phylogenetically derived teresomatan and viviparous caecilianGeotrypetes seraphini seraphiniwas analysed for patterns of sexual dimorphism. In terms of body size females were the larger sex, but when body length was adjusted male-biased intersexual differences in cloacal shape appeared. The larger female size is likely explained by fecundity selection as clutch size was positively correlated to female body length. Unexpectedly a cryptic, ontogeny related variation of the nuchal collars was found. An overview of SSD in caecilians including data for 27 species of nine out of ten existing families revealed a quite high number of taxa showing sexually dimorphic head size dimensions exclusively present among phylogenetically derived teresomatan caecilians. Still further research including insights into the behavioural ecology and molecular ecology of mating systems is warranted to better understand the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of caecilian amphibians.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document