Can the Past Hypothesis Explain the Psychological Arrow of Time?

Author(s):  
Meir Hemmo ◽  
Orly Shenker
Author(s):  
Donald C. Williams

This chapter is about the arrow or direction of time against the backdrop of the pure manifold theory. It is accepted that the fact that time has a direction ought to be explained. It is proposed that the arrow of time is grounded in deeper facts about the four-dimensional nature of each object in the manifold and in facts about the overall four-dimensional shape of the universe. Towards the end of the chapter the possibility of time travel is discussed. It is argued that time travel is metaphysically possible and that there is a reasonable and intelligible sense in which a time traveler can and cannot change the past, according to the pure manifold theory.


Synthese ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165
Author(s):  
Peter Mark Ainsworth

Quantum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Andrea Di Biagio ◽  
Pietro Donà ◽  
Carlo Rovelli

The operational formulations of quantum theory are drastically time oriented. However, to the best of our knowledge, microscopic physics is time-symmetric. We address this tension by showing that the asymmetry of the operational formulations does not reflect a fundamental time-orientation of physics. Instead, it stems from built-in assumptions about the users of the theory. In particular, these formalisms are designed for predicting the future based on information about the past, and the main mathematical objects contain implicit assumption about the past, but not about the future. The main asymmetry in quantum theory is the difference between knowns and unknowns.


Author(s):  
Roger Penrose ◽  
Martin Gardner

Central to our feelings of awareness is the sensation of the progression of time. We seem to be moving ever forward, from a definite past into an uncertain future. The past is over, we feel, and there is nothing to be done with it. It is unchangeable, and in a certain sense, it is ‘out there’ still. Our present knowledge of it may come from our records, our memory traces, and from our deductions from them, but we do not tend to doubt the actuality of the past. The past was one thing and can (now) be only one thing. What has happened has happened, and there is now nothing whatever that we, nor anyone else can do about it! The future, on the other hand, seems yet undetermined. It could turn out to be one thing or it could turn out to be another. Perhaps this ‘choice’ is fixed completely by physical laws, or perhaps partly by our own decisions (or by God); but this ‘choice’ seems still there to be made. There appear to be merely potentialities for whatever the ‘reality’ of the future may actually resolve itself to be. As we consciously perceive time to pass, the most immediate part of that vast and seemingly undetermined future continuously becomes realized as actuality, and thus makes its entry into the fixed past. Sometimes we may have the feeling that we even have been personally ‘responsible’ for somewhat influencing that choice of particular potential future which in fact becomes realized, and made permanent in the actuality of the past. More often, we feel ourselves to be helpless spectators - perhaps thankfully relieved of responsibility - as, inexorably, the scope of the determined past edges its way into an uncertain future. Yet physics, as we know it, tells a different story. All the successful equations of physics are symmetrical in time. They can be used equally well in one direction in time as in the other. The future and the past seem physically to be on a completely equal footing. Newton’s laws, Hamilton’s equations, Maxwell’s equations, Einstein’s general relativity, Dirac’s equation, the Schrödinger equation - all remain effectively unaltered if we reverse the direction of time.


Author(s):  
Alexandre Harvey-Tremblay

Consistent with special relativity and statistical physics, here we construct a partition function of space-time events. The union of these two theories resolves longstanding problems in regards to time. It augments the standard description of time given by the (non-relativistic) arrow of time to one able to show the emergence of three macroscopic regimes of time: the past, the present, and the future, represented by space-like entropy, light-like entropy, and time-like entropy, respectively, and in a manner consistent with our experience of said regimes. First, using Fermi-Dirac statistics, we find that the system essentially describes a "waterfall" of space-time events. This "waterfall" recedes in space-time at the speed of light towards the direction of the future as it "floods" local space with events that it depletes from the past. In this union, an observer O will perceive two horizons that can be interpreted as hiding events behind it. The first is an event horizon, and its entropy hides events in the regions that O cannot see. The second is a time horizon, and its entropy "shields" events from O's causal influence. As only past events are "shielded", and not future events, an asymmetry in time is thus created. Finally, future events are hidden by an entropy prohibiting O from knowing the future before the present catches on.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document