Chapter 12: Predicting Effort and Errors for Embedded Software Development Projects by Using an Artificial Neural Network

Author(s):  
Kazunori Iwata ◽  
Sayori Maeji ◽  
Toshio Nakagawa
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori Iwata ◽  
Toyoshiro Nakasima ◽  
Yoshiyuki Anan ◽  
Naohiro Ishii

Previous investigation focused on the prediction of total and errors for embedded software development projects using an artificial neural network (ANN). However, methods using ANNs have reached their improvement limits, since an appropriate value is estimated using what is known as point estimation in statistics. This paper proposes a method for predicting the number of errors for embedded software development projects using interval estimation provided by a support vector machine and ANN.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramene U. Lim ◽  
Dante L. Silva ◽  
Kevin Lawrence M. De Jesus

The aim of this study is to be able to come up with a supplemental project management policy guidelines and computational tool that will address the two major concerns in construction of low-cost housing, construction delays and workmanship defects. Through assessment of previous studies, factors causing delays and defects from the two major stakeholders involved in housing development projects were identified. With the use of the five-point Likert Scale in survey forms distributed to 60 professionals involved in housing development projects, factors were classified and identified according to its degree of impact on the overall construction efficiency. The statistics of these factors were organized and used to develop an Artificial Neural Network Model. The relative importance of the factors was measured using Garson’s Algorithm. The derived equations from the developed ANN Model were used in formulating the computational tool and supplemental policy guidelines that can now be used to evaluate the workmanship defects and delay ratings of different housing developments. The computational tool was tested by 10 experts with their current projects and was able to receive a 4.6 out of 5 rubric evaluation rating, showing the tool’s effectiveness in identifying and assessing the probability and impact of construction deficiencies on their projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document