Special relativity experiments explained from the perspective of the rotating frame

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (31) ◽  
pp. 1950255
Author(s):  
A. Sfarti

In this paper, we present an explanation of several fundamental tests of special relativity from the perspective of the frame co-moving with a rotating observer. The solution is of great interest for real-time applications because Earth-bound laboratories are inertial only in approximation. We present the derivation of the Sagnac, Michelson–Morley, Kennedy–Thorndike and the Hammar experiments as viewed from the Earth-bound uniformly rotating frame or, as in the case of the Mossbauer rotor experiments, from the perspective of the rotating device. An entire section is dedicated to length/time measurement and to clock synchronization and another one to the Doppler effect and aberration on uniformly rotating platforms. This paper brings new information in the following areas: – new approach for clock synchronization on a rotating platform – new approach for length measurement in rotating frames – new explanation of the Doppler effect and of the Mossbauer rotor experiment – new explanation of the Kennedy–Thorndike experiment. The main thrust of this paper is to give a consistent explanation of various tests of special relativity as judged from the perspective of the rotating frame of the experimental setup. In addition, we correct certain misconceptions relative to clock synchronization and length measurement that have survived a long time in the specialty literature. A special chapter is dedicated to the derivation of the Doppler effect and of aberration in rotating frames. It is shown that such derivation is far from being trivial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1398-1410
Author(s):  
Matias Slavov

AbstractEternalism is the view that all times are equally real. The relativity of simultaneity in special relativity backs this up. There is no cosmically extended, self-existing ‘now.’ This leads to a tricky problem. What makes statements about the present true? I shall approach the problem along the lines of perspectival realism and argue that the choice of the perspective does. To corroborate this point, the Lorentz transformations of special relativity are compared to the structurally similar equations of the Doppler effect. The ‘now’ is perspectivally real in the same way as a particular electromagnetic spectrum frequency. I also argue that the ontology of time licensed by perspectival realism is more credible in this context than its current alternative, the fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity.


1976 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.G. Ashworth ◽  
P.A. Davies

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-421
Author(s):  
Shukri Klinaku

Up to date, physics has neglected the crucial role of the relative velocity in the Doppler Effect. This is a small error in appearance, but it brings big problems to all of physics. Observed frequency is dependent only on the relative velocity between wavefronts and the wave source/observer. This new approach to the Doppler Effect finds application in all kinds of fields, when the source (observer) is moving.


2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 872-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Georges

The results by S. Devasia seem to miss the invariance properties of special relativity and of relativistic electromagnetism. Incorrect conclusions are pointed out and the correct ones as well as the physical consequences are presented. These include the covariant formulation of the laws of physics, the correct formulation of the Doppler effect, and of the invariance of light propagation


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (14) ◽  
pp. 1847016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Corda

In this paper, we give a correct interpretation of a historical experiment by Kündig on the transverse Doppler shift in a rotating system (Mössbauer rotor experiment). This experiment has been recently first reanalyzed, and then replied by an experimental research group. The results of reanalyzing the experiment have shown that a correct re-processing of Kündig’s experimental data gives an interesting deviation of a relative redshift between emission and absorption resonant lines from the standard prediction based on the relativistic dilatation of time. Subsequent new experimental results by the reply of Kündig experiment have shown a deviation from the standard prediction even higher. By using the Equivalence Principle (EP), which states the equivalence between the gravitational “force” and the pseudo-force experienced by an observer in a noninertial frame of reference (included a rotating frame of reference), here the theoretical framework of the Mössbauer rotor experiment is reanalyzed directly in the rotating frame of reference through a general relativistic treatment. It will be shown that previous analyses missed an important effect of clock synchronization. By adding this new effect, the correct general relativistic prevision is in perfect agreement with the new experimental results. Such an effect of clock synchronization has been missed in various papers in the literature, with some subsequent claim of invalidity of the relativity theory and/or some attempts to explain the experimental results through “exotic” effects. The general relativistic interpretation in this paper shows, instead that the new experimental results of the Mössbauer rotor experiment are a new, strong and independent proof of general relativity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document