scholarly journals Comparative Modal Analysis of Monopile and Jacket Supported Offshore Wind Turbines including Soil-Structure Interaction

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2042016
Author(s):  
A. Abdullahi ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
S. Bhattacharya
Keyword(s):  
Wind Turbines ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Natural Frequencies ◽  
Model Updating ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Analysis And Design ◽  
Offshore Wind Turbines ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Wide Range

Offshore wind turbines (OWTs) have emerged as a reliable source of renewable energy, witnessing massive deployment across the world. While there is a wide range of support foundations for these structures, the monopile and jacket are most utilized so far; their deployment is largely informed by water depths and turbine ratings. However, the recommended water depth ranges are often violated, leading to cross-deployment of the two foundation types. This study first investigates the dynamic implication of this practice to incorporate the findings into future analysis and design of these structures. Detailed finite element (FE) models of Monopile and Jacket supported OWTs are developed in the commercial software, ANSYS. Nonlinear soil springs are used to simulate the soil-structure interactions (SSI) and the group effects of the jacket piles are considered by using the relevant modification factors. Modal analyzes of the fixed and flexible-base cases are carried out, and natural frequencies are chosen as the comparison parameters throughout the study. Second, this study constructs a few-parameters SSI model for the two FE models developed above, which aims to use fewer variables in the FE model updating process without compromising its simulation quality. Maximum lateral soil resistance and soil depths are related using polynomial equations, this replaces the standard nonlinear soil spring model. The numerical results show that for the same turbine rating and total height, jacket supported OWTs generally have higher first-order natural frequencies than the monopile supported OWTs, while the reverse is true for the second-order vibration modes, for both fixed and flexible foundations. This contributes to future design considerations of OWTs. On the other hand, with only two parameters, the proposed SSI model has achieved the same accuracy as that using the standard model with seven parameters. It has the potential to become a new SSI model, especially for the identification of soil properties through the model updating process.

scholarly journals Tripod-Supported Offshore Wind Turbines: Modal and Coupled Analysis and a Parametric Study Using X-SEA and FAST

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasin Plodpradit ◽  
Van Nguyen Dinh ◽  
Ki-Du Kim
Keyword(s):  
Wind Turbines ◽  
Natural Frequencies ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Coupled Analysis ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Support Structures ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Support Structure ◽  
Offshore Wind Turbines

This paper presents theoretical aspects and an extensive numerical study of the coupled analysis of tripod support structures for offshore wind turbines (OWTs) by using X-SEA and FAST v8 programs. In a number of site conditions such as extreme and longer period waves, fast installation, and lighter foundations, tripod structures are more advantageous than monopile and jacket structures. In the implemented dynamic coupled analysis, the sub-structural module in FAST was replaced by the X-SEA offshore substructure analysis component. The time-histories of the reaction forces and the turbine loads were then calculated. The results obtained from X-SEA and from FAST were in good agreement. The pile-soil-structure interaction (PSSI) was included for reliable evaluation of OWT structural systems. The superelement concept was introduced to reduce the computational time. Modal, coupled and uncoupled analyses of the NREL 5MW OWT-tripod support structure including PSSI were carried out and the discussions on the natural frequencies, mode shapes and resulted displacements are presented. Compared to the uncoupled models, the physical interaction between the tower and the support structure in the coupled models resulted in smaller responses. Compared to the fixed support structures, i.e., when PSSI is not included, the piled-support structure has lower natural frequencies and larger responses attributed to its actual flexibility. The models using pile superelements are computationally efficient and give results that are identical to the common finite element models.

scholarly journals Support condition monitoring of offshore wind turbines using model updating techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1017-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xu ◽  
George Nikitas ◽  
Tong Zhang ◽  
Qinghua Han ◽  
Marios Chryssanthopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Wind Turbine ◽  
Wind Turbines ◽  
Model Updating ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
Offshore Wind Turbine ◽  
Support Condition ◽  
Offshore Wind Turbines ◽  
Wind Turbine System

The offshore wind turbines are dynamically sensitive, whose fundamental frequency can be very close to the forcing frequencies activated by the environmental and turbine loads. Minor changes of support conditions may lead to the shift of natural frequencies, and this could be disastrous if resonance happens. To monitor the support conditions and thus to enhance the safety of offshore wind turbines, a model updating method is developed in this study. A hybrid sensing system was fabricated and set up in the laboratory to investigate the long-term dynamic behaviour of the offshore wind turbine system with monopile foundation in sandy deposits. A finite element model was constructed to simulate structural behaviours of the offshore wind turbine system. Distributed nonlinear springs and a roller boundary condition are used to model the soil–structure interaction properties. The finite element model and the test results were used to analyse the variation of the support condition of the monopile, through an finite element model updating process using estimation of distribution algorithms. The results show that the fundamental frequency of the test model increases after a period under cyclic loading, which is attributed to the compaction of the surrounding sand instead of local damage of the structure. The hybrid sensing system is reliable to detect both the acceleration and strain responses of the offshore wind turbine model and can be potentially applied to the remote monitoring of real offshore wind turbines. The estimation of distribution algorithm–based model updating technique is demonstrated to be successful for the support condition monitoring of the offshore wind turbine system, which is potentially useful for other model updating and condition monitoring applications.

scholarly journals Soil–Structure Interactions for Offshore Wind Turbines

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhamoy Bhattacharya ◽  
Georgios Nikitas ◽  
Laszlo Arany ◽  
Nikolaos Nikitas
Keyword(s):  
Wind Turbines ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
Offshore Wind Turbines

Comparison of Three Different TLPs for Wind Turbines by Tank Tests and Calculated Results

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Adam ◽  
T. Myland ◽  
F. Dahlhaus ◽  
J. Großmann
Keyword(s):  
Wind Turbine ◽  
Dynamic Behavior ◽  
Wind Turbines ◽  
Main Part ◽  
Natural Frequencies ◽  
Type Structure ◽  
Offshore Wind ◽  
Wave Loads ◽  
Offshore Wind Turbines ◽  
Short Overview

This paper will give a short overview of the path of development of the so called GICON® - Tension Leg Platform (TLP) for offshore wind turbines. The main part of the paper will provide a summary as well as insights from three different model basin tests. Furthermore, the comparison of a truss like structure (first concept) with a shell type structure (third concept) deduced from the measured results and also by comparison of the natural frequencies will be presented. Both structures were tested in wave tanks in a scale of 1:25. The results also include a focus on the overall dynamic behavior of the structure. In addition to the two 1:25 models, a 1:37 model was also tested at MARIN, utilizing the MARIN stock wind turbine. This model is also included in the comparison. Therefore the different scales are considered but the comparison is presented exclusively for wave loads as only the 1:37 model was tested under wind and wave conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document