Integral Domains Whose w-Integral Closures Are Krull Domains

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (02) ◽  
pp. 287-298
Author(s):  
Gyu Whan Chang ◽  
HwanKoo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Dedekind Domain ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Krull Domain ◽  
Integral Closures ◽  
Krull Domains

Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K, [Formula: see text] be the integral closure of D in K, and D[w] be the w-integral closure of D in K; so [Formula: see text], and equality holds when D is Noetherian or dim(D) = 1. The Mori–Nagata theorem states that if D is Noetherian, then [Formula: see text] is a Krull domain; it has also been investigated when [Formula: see text] is a Dedekind domain. We study integral domains D such that D[w] is a Krull domain. We also provide an example of an integral domain D such that [Formula: see text], t-dim(D) = 1, [Formula: see text] is a Prüfer v-multiplication domain with t-dim([Formula: see text]) = 2, and D[w] is a UFD.

INTEGRAL AND COMPLETE INTEGRAL CLOSURES OF IDEALS IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 701-710
Author(s):  
A. MIMOUNI
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Dedekind Domains ◽  
Integrally Closed ◽  
Complete Integral Closure ◽  
Integral Closures ◽  
The Ideal

This paper studies the integral and complete integral closures of an ideal in an integral domain. By definition, the integral closure of an ideal I of a domain R is the ideal given by I′ ≔ {x ∈ R | x satisfies an equation of the form xr + a1xr-1 + ⋯ + ar = 0, where ai ∈ Ii for each i ∈ {1, …, r}}, and the complete integral closure of I is the ideal Ī ≔ {x ∈ R | there exists 0 ≠ = c ∈ R such that cxn ∈ In for all n ≥ 1}. An ideal I is said to be integrally closed or complete (respectively, completely integrally closed) if I = I′ (respectively, I = Ī). We investigate the integral and complete integral closures of ideals in many different classes of integral domains and we give a new characterization of almost Dedekind domains via the complete integral closure of ideals.

On Chain Conditions in Integral Domains

1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Barucci ◽  
David E. Dobbs
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Chain Condition ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Dedekind Domain ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Chain Conditions ◽  
Ascending Chain Condition

AbstractThe following two theorems are proved. If R is an Archimedean conducive integral domain, then R is quasilocal and dim(R) ≤1. If each overring of an integral domain R has ascending chain condition on divisorial ideals, then the integral closure of R is a Dedekind domain. Both theorems sharpen results already known in the Noetherian case. The second theorem leads to a strengthened converse of the Krull-Akizuki Theorem. We also investigate the effect of restricting the hypothesis in the second theorem to the proper overrings of R.

scholarly journals $$v_c$$-Noetherian domains and Krull domains

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyu Whan Chang
Keyword(s):  
Dedekind Domain ◽  
Closed Domain ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Star Operation ◽  
Krull Domain ◽  
Noetherian Domain ◽  
Integrally Closed ◽  
Krull Domains

AbstractLet D be an integrally closed domain, $$\{V_{\alpha }\}$$ { V α } be the set of t-linked valuation overrings of D, and $$v_c$$ v c be the star operation on D defined by $$I^{v_c} = \bigcap _{\alpha } IV_{\alpha }$$ I v c = ⋂ α I V α for all nonzero fractional ideals I of D. In this paper, among other things, we prove that D is a $$v_c$$ v c -Noetherian domain if and only if D is a Krull domain, if and only if $$v_c = v$$ v c = v and every prime t-ideal of D is a maximal t-ideal. As a corollary, we have that if D is one-dimensional, then $$v_c = v$$ v c = v if and only if D is a Dedekind domain.

scholarly journals On complete integral closure and Archimedean valuation domains

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gilmer
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Extension Field ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Valuation Domains ◽  
Complete Integral Closure

AbstractSuppose D is an integral domain with quotient field K and that L is an extension field of K. We show in Theorem 4 that if the complete integral closure of D is an intersection of Archimedean valuation domains on K, then the complete integral closure of D in L is an intersection of Archimedean valuation domains on L; this answers a question raised by Gilmer and Heinzer in 1965.

Ordinary Singularities with Decreasing Hilbert Function

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie G. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Hilbert Function ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Minimal Prime Ideal ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Graded Ring ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Minimal Prime ◽  
Dimension One

Let A be the co-ordinate ring of a reduced curve over a field k. This means that A is an algebra of finite type over k, A has no nilpotent elements, and that if P is a minimal prime ideal of A, then A/P is an integral domain of Krull dimension one. Let M be a maximal ideal of A. Then G(A) (the graded ring of A relative to M) is defined to be . We get the same graded ring if we first localize at M, and then form the graded ring of AM relative to the maximal ideal MAM. That isLet Ā be the integral closure of A. If P1, P2, …, Ps are the minimal primes of A thenwhere A/Pi is a domain and is the integral closure of A/Pi in its quotient field.

scholarly journals Groups generated by elements with rational fixed points

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Mason
Keyword(s):  
Normal Subgroup ◽  
Fixed Points ◽  
Large Class ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Structure Theorem ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Linear Fractional Transformations ◽  
Krull Domain ◽  
Dedekind Domains ◽  
Precise Version

Let R be a commutative integral domain and let S be its quotient field. The group GL2(R) acts on Ŝ = S ∪ {∞} as a group of linear fractional transformations in the usual way. Let F2(R, z) be the stabilizer of z ∈ Ŝ in GL2(R) and let F2(R) be the subgroup generated by all F2(R, z). Among the subgroups contained in F2(R) are U2(R), the subgroup generated by all unipotent matrices, and NE2(R), the normal subgroup generated by all elementary matrices.We prove a structure theorem for F2(R, z), when R is a Krull domain. A more precise version holds when R is a Dedekind domain. For a large class of arithmetic Dedekind domains it is known that the groups NE2(R),U2(R) and SL2(R) coincide. An example is given for which all these subgroups are distinct.

FINITELY VALUATIVE DOMAINS

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (06) ◽  
pp. 1250112 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL-JEAN CAHEN ◽  
DAVID E. DOBBS ◽  
THOMAS G. LUCAS
Keyword(s):  
Nonnegative Integer ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Nonzero Element ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Prüfer Domain ◽  
Maximal Ideals ◽  
Saturated Chain

For a pair of rings S ⊆ T and a nonnegative integer n, an element t ∈ T\S is said to be within n steps of S if there is a saturated chain of rings S = S0 ⊊ S1 ⊊ ⋯ ⊊ Sm = S[t] with length m ≤ n. An integral domain R is said to be n-valuative (respectively, finitely valuative) if for each nonzero element u in its quotient field, at least one of u and u-1 is within n (respectively, finitely many) steps of R. The integral closure of a finitely valuative domain is a Prüfer domain. Moreover, an n-valuative domain has at most 2n + 1 maximal ideals; and an n-valuative domain with 2n + 1 maximal ideals must be a Prüfer domain.

scholarly journals Integral ∨-ideals

1981 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Maximal Ideal ◽  
Integral Domain ◽  
Dedekind Domain ◽  
Integral Ideal ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Fractional Ideal

Let R be an integral domain with quotient field K. A fractional ideal I of R is a ∨-ideal if I is the intersection of all the principal fractional ideals of R which contain I. If I is an integral ∨-ideal, at first one is tempted to think that I is actually just the intersection of the principal integral ideals which contain I.However, this is not true. For example, if R is a Dedekind domain, then all integral ideals are ∨-ideals. Thus a maximal ideal of R is an intersection of principal integral ideals if and only if it is actually principal. Hence, if R is a Dedekind domain, each integral ∨-ideal is an intersection of principal integral ideals precisely when R is a PID.

WHEN IS THE INTEGRAL CLOSURE COMPARABLE TO ALL INTERMEDIATE RINGS

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
MABROUK BEN NASR ◽  
NABIL ZEIDI
Keyword(s):  
Integral Domain ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Integral Closure ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Quotient Rings

Let $R\subset S$ be an extension of integral domains, with $R^{\ast }$ the integral closure of $R$ in $S$. We study the set of intermediate rings between $R$ and $S$. We establish several necessary and sufficient conditions for which every ring contained between $R$ and $S$ compares with $R^{\ast }$ under inclusion. This answers a key question that figured in the work of Gilmer and Heinzer [‘Intersections of quotient rings of an integral domain’, J. Math. Kyoto Univ.7 (1967), 133–150].

scholarly journals INTEGRAL DOMAINS WHOSE SIMPLE OVERRINGS ARE INTERSECTIONS OF LOCALIZATIONS

2005 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 195-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARCO FONTANA ◽  
EVAN HOUSTON ◽  
THOMAS LUCAS
Keyword(s):  
Dedekind Domain ◽  
Quotient Field ◽  
Integral Domains ◽  
Finiteness Conditions ◽  
Integrally Closed ◽  
Prufer Domains ◽  
Prüfer Domains

Call a domain R an sQQR-domain if each simple overring of R, i.e., each ring of the form R[u] with u in the quotient field of R, is an intersection of localizations of R. We characterize Prüfer domains as integrally closed sQQR-domains. In the presence of certain finiteness conditions, we show that the sQQR-property is very strong; for instance, a Mori sQQR-domain must be a Dedekind domain. We also show how to construct sQQR-domains which have (non-simple) overrings which are not intersections of localizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document