scholarly journals Nucleon Resonances in the Photoproduction γp → K∗+Λ

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 1860032
Author(s):  
F. Huang ◽  
A. C. Wang ◽  
W. L. Wang ◽  
H. Haberzettl ◽  
K. Nakayama
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Angular Distribution ◽  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Cross Section Data ◽  
Section Data ◽  
Spin Observables ◽  
Effective Lagrangian ◽  
Reaction Amplitude

The differential cross-section data from the CLAS Collaboration for [Formula: see text] have been analyzed based on an effective Lagrangian approach. The [Formula: see text]-channel [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] exchanges, the [Formula: see text]-channel [Formula: see text] and near-threshold [Formula: see text]’s exchanges, the [Formula: see text]-channel [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] exchanges, and the generalized contact term are considered in constructing the reaction amplitude. It is found that by including the [Formula: see text] resonance, which is responsible for the shape of the angular distribution of [Formula: see text] near the [Formula: see text] threshold, and one of the [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] resonances, one can describe the cross-section data for this reaction reasonably well. More experimental data on spin observables are needed to further pin down the resonance contents and associated resonance parameters in this reaction.

Regge Pole Plus Background Model of Backward πp Scattering

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (13) ◽  
pp. 1155-1159
Author(s):  
S. Kogitz ◽  
R. K. Logan
Keyword(s):  
Differential Cross Section ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Charge Exchange ◽  
Differential Cross ◽  
Regge Pole ◽  
Background Model ◽  
Cross Section Data ◽  
Section Data ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Exchange Scattering

We present a model of backward π+p, π−p, and π−p charge exchange scattering consistent with our earlier approach to forward π−p charge exchange and backward π+p. We consider two body differential cross section data which exhibits a dip–bump structure as well as nonzero polarization. This is explained in terms of a dominant Regge pole vanishing at the dip accompanied by a background. The background is primarily responsible for the large u behavior of the cross section which includes the rise after the dip. It is assumed that the presence of nonzero polarization dictates this behavior. We isolate the I = 3/2 amplitude in π−p backwards and determine the I = 1/2 amplitude from π+p backwards. A prediction for π−p → nπ0 follows.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document