The Jacobi Inversion Problem for Soliton Equations

1997 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 2277-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbo Zeng
2002 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Xiu Ma ◽  
Yunbo Zeng

AbstractIn contrast to mono-constrained flows with N degrees of freedom, binary constrained flows of soliton equations, admitting 2 × 2 Lax matrices, have 2N degrees of freedom. Currently existing methods only enable Lax matrices to yield the first N pairs of canonical separated variables. An approach for constructing the second N pairs of canonical separated variables with N additional separated equations is introduced. The Jacobi inversion problems for binary constrained flows are then established. Finally, the separability of binary constrained flows together with the factorization of soliton equations by the spatial and temporal binary constrained flows leads to the Jacobi inversion problems for soliton equations.


Author(s):  
Fritz Gesztesy ◽  
Helge Holden ◽  
Johanna Michor ◽  
Gerald Teschl

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Fuller ◽  
Henry Thomas
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar B. Rocha ◽  
William R. Young ◽  
Ian Grooms

AbstractThis study investigates the representation of solutions of the three-dimensional quasigeostrophic (QG) equations using Galerkin series with standard vertical modes, with particular attention to the incorporation of active surface buoyancy dynamics. This study extends two existing Galerkin approaches (A and B) and develops a new Galerkin approximation (C). Approximation A, due to Flierl, represents the streamfunction as a truncated Galerkin series and defines the potential vorticity (PV) that satisfies the inversion problem exactly. Approximation B, due to Tulloch and Smith, represents the PV as a truncated Galerkin series and calculates the streamfunction that satisfies the inversion problem exactly. Approximation C, the true Galerkin approximation for the QG equations, represents both streamfunction and PV as truncated Galerkin series but does not satisfy the inversion equation exactly. The three approximations are fundamentally different unless the boundaries are isopycnal surfaces. The authors discuss the advantages and limitations of approximations A, B, and C in terms of mathematical rigor and conservation laws and illustrate their relative efficiency by solving linear stability problems with nonzero surface buoyancy. With moderate number of modes, B and C have superior accuracy than A at high wavenumbers. Because B lacks the conservation of energy, this study recommends approximation C for constructing solutions to the surface active QG equations using the Galerkin series with standard vertical modes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document