Participants’ Experience and Adherence in Repeated Measurement Studies Among Office-Based Workers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junoš Lukan ◽  
Larissa Bolliger ◽  
Els Clays ◽  
Oscar Mayora ◽  
Venet Osmani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 2248-2268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivonne Martin ◽  
Hae‐Won Uh ◽  
Taniawati Supali ◽  
Makedonka Mitreva ◽  
Jeanine J. Houwing‐Duistermaat

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
RakeshKumar Rana ◽  
Richa Singhal ◽  
Vineeta Singh

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Röseler ◽  
Daniel Wolf ◽  
Johannes Leder ◽  
Astrid Schütz

We argue that the test-retest reliability coefficient, which is the correlation between a measurement and a repeated measurement using the same diagnostic instrument in the same sample (sometimes referred to as repeatability or falsely referred to as stability), is by itself not an appropriate measure of the reliability of the diagnostic instrument or of the stability of the construct in question. In combination with an actual coefficient of reliability such as Cronbach’s alpha, the test-retest reliability coefficient can be used to estimate and compare the stabilities of constructs using a procedure based on the correction for attenuation. However, results from a simulation study showed that classically constructed confidence intervals for the estimator exhibit under-coverage and thus cannot be interpreted correctly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document