scholarly journals Reduced Cathartic Bowel Preparation for CT Colonography: Prospective Comparison of 2-L Polyethylene Glycol and Magnesium Citrate

Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 261 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander W. Keedy ◽  
Judy Yee ◽  
Rizwan Aslam ◽  
Stefanie Weinstein ◽  
Luis A. Landeras ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 254 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary S. Borden ◽  
Perry J. Pickhardt ◽  
David H. Kim ◽  
Meghan G. Lubner ◽  
Demetrios J. Agriantonis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Sang Hoon Kim ◽  
Ji Hyeong Kim ◽  
Bora Keum ◽  
Han Jo Jeon ◽  
Se Hyun Jang ◽  
...  

Patient compliance during bowel preparation is important for successful colonoscopy. Bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol (PEG), the most commonly used solution for cleansing, involves the unpleasant ingestion of a large amount of liquid. Sodium picosulfate magnesium citrate (SP-MC) solution is an alternative option with better palatability than PEG. Therefore, in this study, we compared the efficacy and patient tolerability among the following three bowel preparation protocols: 2 L PEG-ascorbic acid (ASc), 1 L PEG-ASc plus bisacodyl, and SP-MC 340 mL plus bisacodyl. We conducted a randomized prospective endoscopist-blinded study between August 2018 and January 2019. A total of 311 patients were randomly classified into three groups according to the above-described bowel preparation protocols. To evaluate the efficacy of bowel cleansing, we used the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. The degree of symptoms and the patients’ satisfaction with each bowel preparation method were investigated using a questionnaire completed before sedation for colonoscopy. The baseline characteristics were similar among the three groups. There was no significant difference in the bowel preparation quality among the three groups. However, the incidence of symptoms, such as abdominal fullness and pain, was significantly lower (P=0.006 and 0.027, respectively) while the patients’ satisfaction rate was significantly higher (P=0.012) in the SP-MC plus bisacodyl group than in the two PEG groups. In this study, the efficacy of the SP-MC plus bisacodyl solution was similar to that of the PEG solutions. However, patient tolerability and satisfaction were better in the SP-MC plus bisacodyl group than in the other groups. In conclusion, the use of SP-MC plus bisacodyl bowel preparation solution might be a better method for providing good intestinal cleansing and improving patient compliance.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 449-457
Author(s):  
Antonio Afonso de Miranda Neto ◽  
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura ◽  
Kelly E Hathorn ◽  
Francisco Tustumi ◽  
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. S176
Author(s):  
Ron Palmon ◽  
Leon Kavaler ◽  
Asher Kornbluth ◽  
Peter Chang ◽  
Peter Legnani ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB515-AB516
Author(s):  
Darwin F. Yeung ◽  
Majid Alsahafi ◽  
Fergal Donnellan ◽  
Baljinder Salh ◽  
Nazira Chatur

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document