Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality with Dose Reduction after Copper Filtration

Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 237 (2) ◽  
pp. 691-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Okka W. Hamer ◽  
Claude B. Sirlin ◽  
Michael Strotzer ◽  
Ingitha Borisch ◽  
Niels Zorger ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARKUS VÖLK ◽  
CHRISTIAN PAETZEL ◽  
PETER ANGELE ◽  
JOHANNES SEITZ ◽  
BERND FÜCHTMEIER ◽  
...  


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Sung Il Jung ◽  
Jin Mo Goo ◽  
Hyun Ju Lee ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Kun Young Lim ◽  
...  


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H. Richter ◽  
Florian Gebhard ◽  
Alexander Eickhoff ◽  
Konrad Schütze

The invention of flat-panel detectors led to a revolution in medical imaging. The major benefits of this technology are a higher image quality and dose reduction. Flat-panel detectors have proved to be superior to standard C-arms (= C-arm with radiograph source and image intensifier). Cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT) is a 3D data set, which can be acquired with a flat-panel detector. The cone-shaped beam is used for 3D data generation. For cone-beam CT acquisition, the flat-panel detector rotates around the patient lying on the operating table. Intra-operative cone-beam CT can be a very helpful tool in orthopaedic surgery. Immediate control of fracture reduction and implant positioning in high image quality can reduce the need for secondary revision surgery due to implant malposition. In recent years there has been a revival of standard fan beam CT technology in operating rooms. Fixed and mobile systems are available. Fixed systems are typically placed on a sliding gantry. Different mobile intra-operative CT scanners were recently introduced. Due to their mobility, they are not bound to a specific operating room. The use of standard intra-operative CT scanners results in high 3D image quality but, in comparison with a cone-beam CT scanner, fluoroscopy is not possible. The introduction of flat-panel detectors has led to improvements in intra-operative image quality combined with dose reduction. The possibility of high-quality 3D imaging in combination with navigation can assure optimal implant placement. Due to immediate control of the osteosynthesis, revision surgery at a later time can be prevented. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170055



Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 235 (2) ◽  
pp. 642-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Uffmann ◽  
Ulrich Neitzel ◽  
Mathias Prokop ◽  
Nahla Kabalan ◽  
Michael Weber ◽  
...  


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Jansson ◽  
Håkan Geijer ◽  
Jan Persliden ◽  
Torbjörn Andersson




2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sjöholm ◽  
H. Geijer ◽  
J. Persliden

Purpose: To compare radiation doses given to patients undergoing IVU (intravenous urography) before and after digitalization of our X-ray department. Material and Methods: IVU examinations were monitored with dose area product meters before and after the X-ray department changed to digital techniques. The first step was a change from film-screen to storage phosphor plates, while the second step involved changing to a flat panel detector. Forty-two patients were included for the film-screen situation, 69 when using the storage phosphor plates, and 70 using the flat panel detector. Results: A dose reduction from 41.8 Gycm2 to 31.5 Gycm2 was achieved with the first step when the film-screen system was replaced with storage phosphor plates. A further reduction to 12.1 Gycm2 was achieved using the flat panel detector. Conclusion: The introduction of the flat panel detectors made a considerable dose reduction possible.



2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Katherine Carton ◽  
Raymond Acciavatti ◽  
Johnny Kuo ◽  
Andrew D. A. Maidment


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document