scholarly journals The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(Tl) full-field flat panel detector

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 920-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Katherine Carton ◽  
Raymond Acciavatti ◽  
Johnny Kuo ◽  
Andrew D. A. Maidment
Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 237 (2) ◽  
pp. 691-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Okka W. Hamer ◽  
Claude B. Sirlin ◽  
Michael Strotzer ◽  
Ingitha Borisch ◽  
Niels Zorger ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Jansson ◽  
Håkan Geijer ◽  
Jan Persliden ◽  
Torbjörn Andersson

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6Part23) ◽  
pp. 2634-2634 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Alspaugh ◽  
E Christodoulou ◽  
M Goodsitt ◽  
J Stayman

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
MONIKA BOCHMANN ◽  
EBERHARD LUDEWIG ◽  
MARIA-ELISABETH KRAUTWALD-JUNGHANNS ◽  
MICHAEL PEES

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e230043
Author(s):  
Jeremy SL Ong ◽  
Felicity Whitewood ◽  
Donna B Taylor ◽  
Deepthi Dissanayake

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a relatively new technique with high sensitivity for breast cancer detection. However, because it only provides limited anatomical information, cross-correlation of MBI findings with conventional breast imaging modalities such as full field digital mammography can be challenging. We report a case of a positive MBI study in a supplemental screening setting, where cross-correlation of MBI, ultrasound, mammogram and biopsy findings was difficult. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) demonstrated a hypervascular lesion at the biopsy clip, helping to prove imaging/histopathological concordance. This case highlights the challenges of incorporating MBI into conventional imaging workup, as well as the use of CESM in problem solving.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruola Ning ◽  
Yong Yu ◽  
David L. Conover ◽  
Xianghua Lu ◽  
Huiguang He ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document