Lumbar spine: postoperative assessment with surface-coil MR imaging.

Radiology ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 164 (3) ◽  
pp. 851-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Ross ◽  
T J Masaryk ◽  
M T Modic ◽  
H Bohlman ◽  
R Delamater ◽  
...  
1989 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 481-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nyman ◽  
M. Hallberg ◽  
J. Sunnegårdh ◽  
J. Thurén ◽  
A. Henze

Fifteen patients ranging in age from 9 to 25 years (median age 10 years), with coarctation of the aorta, were investigated with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging pre- and postoperatively. Three patients were examined because of suggested re-stenosis. Both MR examination and cineangiography were performed in 11 patients. The two techniques were comparable concerning the evaluation of both the site and the severity of coarctation as well as of the occurrence of collateral vessels. MR was considered suitable to replace angiography in the pre- and postoperative assessment of coarctation. The patients were preferably examined with a surface spine coil with ECG-gated sagittal, transverse and parafrontal images. The parafrontal images were necessary in order to minimize mistakes due to partial volume effects at the coarctation site. A surface coil placed over the sternum considerably improved the visualization of the internal mammary arteries.


1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1115
Author(s):  
Moo Sang Lee ◽  
Myeong Jin Kim ◽  
Jong Tae Lee ◽  
Yeon Hee Lee ◽  
Pil Sik Choi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Yang ◽  
Zhiyun Feng ◽  
Nian Chen ◽  
Zhenhua Hong ◽  
Yongyu Zheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To investigate the role of gravity in the sedimentation of lumbar spine nerve roots using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of various body positions. Methods A total of 56 patients, who suffered from back pain and underwent conventional supine lumbar spine MR imaging, were selected from sanmen hospital database. All the patients were called back to our hospital to perform MR imaging in prone position or lateral position. Furthermore, the sedimentation sign (SedSign) was determined based on the suspension of the nerve roots in the dural sac on cross-sectional MR images, and 31 cases were rated as positive and another 25 cases were negative. Results The mean age of negative SedSign group was significantly younger than that of positive SedSign group (51.7 ± 8.7 vs 68.4 ± 10.5, P < 0.05). The constitutions of clinical diagnosis were significantly different between patients with a positive SedSign and those with a negative SedSign (P < 0.001). Overall, nerve roots of the vast majority of patients (48/56, 85.7%) subsided to the ventral side of the dural sac on the prone MR images, although that of 8 (14.3%) patients remain stay in the dorsal side of dural sac. Nerve roots of only one patient with negative SedSign did not settle to the ventral dural sac, while this phenomenon occurred in 7 patients in positive SedSign group (4% vs 22.6%, P < 0.001). In addition, the nerve roots of all the five patients subsided to the left side of dural sac on lateral position MR images. Conclusions The nerve roots sedimentation followed the direction of gravity. Positive SedSign may be a MR sign of lumbar pathology involved the spinal canal.


1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-602
Author(s):  
Peter C. Young ◽  
Cheryl A. Petersilge
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-J. Kim ◽  
J. T. Lee ◽  
M. S. Lee ◽  
J. S. Suh ◽  
H. S. Yoo

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarke B. Hansen ◽  
Philip Hansen ◽  
Anders F. Christensen ◽  
Charlotte Trampedach ◽  
Zoreh Rasti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 20150420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei Manoliu ◽  
Georg Spinner ◽  
Michael Wyss ◽  
Lukas Filli ◽  
Stefan Erni ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 250 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Carrino ◽  
Jon D. Lurie ◽  
Anna N. A. Tosteson ◽  
Tor D. Tosteson ◽  
Eugene J. Carragee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document