Human lower esophageal sphincter pressure response to increased intra-abdominal pressure

1990 ◽  
Vol 258 (4) ◽  
pp. G624-G630 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Mittal ◽  
M. Fisher ◽  
R. W. McCallum ◽  
D. F. Rochester ◽  
J. Dent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction ◽  
Tonic Contraction ◽  
Pressure Response ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Abdominal Compression ◽  
Gastric Pressure ◽  
Straight Leg Raising ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Crural Diaphragm

We studied the effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in 15 healthy subjects. The role of the diaphragm in the genesis of LES pressure during increased intra-abdominal pressure was determined by measuring diaphragm electromyogram (EMG). The latter was recorded using bipolar intraesophageal platinum electrodes that were placed on the nonpressure sensing surface of the sleeve device. We also measured the LES pressure response to increased intra-abdominal pressure during inhibition of the smooth muscles of the LES by intravenous atropine (12 micrograms/kg). Straight-leg raising and abdominal compression were used to increase intra-abdominal pressure. Our results show that the increase in LES pressure during straight-leg raising is greater than the increase in gastric pressure. During abdominal compression, the rate of LES pressure increase is faster than that of the gastric pressure, suggesting an active contraction at the esophagogastric junction. The increase in LES pressure during periods of increased intra-abdominal pressure is associated with a tonic contraction of the crural diaphragm as demonstrated by EMG recording. Atropine inhibited the resting LES pressure by 50-70% in each subject but had no effect either on the peak LES pressure attained during increased intra-abdominal pressure or tonic crural diaphragm EMG. We conclude that 1) there is an active contraction at the esophagogastric junction during periods of increased intra-abdominal pressure and 2) tonic contraction of the crural diaphragm is a mechanism for this LES pressure response.

Sphincteric action of the diaphragm during a relaxed lower esophageal sphincter in humans

1989 ◽  
Vol 256 (1) ◽  
pp. G139-G144 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. K. Mittal ◽  
D. F. Rochester ◽  
R. W. McCallum
Keyword(s):  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Pressure Increase ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Bipolar Electrodes ◽  
Human Volunteers ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Crural Diaphragm ◽  
Voluntary Contractions

We studied the effects of involuntary and voluntary contraction of the diaphragm on esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure during esophageal distension in healthy human volunteers. The EGJ pressure was monitored using a Dent sleeve device. Along with the pressure we concurrently monitored diaphragm electromyogram (EMG) using intra-esophageal bipolar electrodes that were placed on the nonpressure sensing surface of the sleeve device. Graded esophageal distensions were performed by graded inflations of a 2-cm-diameter balloon that was positioned 7 cm above the EGJ. The graded esophageal distensions caused a graded increase in the amplitude of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (end-expiratory EGJ pressure). In a majority of the subjects, esophageal distension had no effect on spontaneous inspiratory EGJ pressure increase and diaphragm EMG. During sustained LES relaxation of greater than 70% induced by sustained esophageal distention, graded voluntary contractions of the diaphragm induced proportional increases in the EGJ pressure and diaphragm EMG. The EGJ pressure and diaphragm EMG were similar during diaphragmatic contraction both before and during esophageal distension. During a maximal and sustained diaphragm contraction, esophageal distension had no effect on the EGJ pressure. We conclude that there are two distinct sphincteric mechanisms at the EGJ, the LES and crural diaphragm, and they respond differently to distension of the distal esophagus.

T1978 Gastric Pressure Increases Above Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Pressure in Subjects with Hiatal Hernia and GERD During Increases in Intra-Abdominal Pressure

2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. A-592
Author(s):  
Annapurna Korimilli ◽  
Anil K. Vegesna ◽  
Larry S. Miller ◽  
Henry P. Parkman ◽  
Frank K. Friedenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiatal Hernia ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Gastric Pressure ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter

scholarly journals Physiological and pathological roles of the accommodation response in lower esophageal sphincter relaxation during wet swallows

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazumasa Muta ◽  
Eikichi Ihara ◽  
Shohei Hamada ◽  
Hiroko Ikeda ◽  
Masafumi Wada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Relaxation Function ◽  
Esophagogastric Junction ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Outflow Obstruction ◽  
High Resolution Manometry ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter

AbstractThe preparatory accommodation response of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before swallowing is one of the mechanisms involved in LES relaxation during wet swallows, however, the physiological and/or pathological roles of LES accommodation remain to be determined in humans. To address this problem, we conducted a prospective observational study of 38 patients with normal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 23 patients with idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) to assess dry and wet swallows. The LES accommodation measurement was proposed for practical use in evaluating the LES accommodation response. Although swallow-induced LES relaxation was observed in both dry and wet swallows, LES accommodation (6.4, 3.1–11.1 mmHg) was only observed in wet swallows. The extent of LES accommodation was impaired in idiopathic EGJOO (0.6, − 0.6–6 mmHg), and the LES accommodation measurement of patients with idiopathic EGJOO (36.8, 29.5–44.3 mmHg) was significantly higher in comparison to those with normal HRM (23.8, 18–28.6 mmHg). Successful LES relaxation in wet swallowing can be achieved by LES accommodation in combination with swallow-induced LES relaxation. Impaired LES accommodation is characteristic of idiopathic EGJOO. In addition to the IRP value, the LES accommodation measurement may be useful for evaluating the LES relaxation function in clinical practice.

Responses of feline gastroesophageal junction to changes in abdominal pressure

1987 ◽  
Vol 253 (3) ◽  
pp. G315-G322 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Boyle ◽  
S. M. Altschuler ◽  
T. E. Nixon ◽  
A. I. Pack ◽  
S. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Gastric Distension ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Electromyographic Activity ◽  
Abdominal Compression ◽  
Balloon Distension ◽  
Gastric Pressure ◽  
High Pressure Zone ◽  
Antireflux Barrier ◽  
Sustained Inhibition

The responses of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), stomach, and diaphragm and their contribution to changes in the high-pressure zone (HPZ) at the gastroesophageal junction were determined during extrinsic abdominal compression or intragastric balloon distension in anesthetized cats. Abdominal compression consistently induced an increase in intraluminal end-expiratory LES and gastric pressure (P less than 0.01). Changes in LES pressure significantly exceeded the changes in gastric pressure (P less than 0.01). In contrast, the LES response during gastric distension was variable in the group of animals despite a consistent volume-dependent increase in gastric pressure. Mean LES pressure for the group was unchanged, although 33% of individual animals exhibited a decrease in LES pressure during gastric distension. Both abdominal stimuli induced sustained inhibition of crural (P less than 0.01), but not costal, diaphragmatic electromyographic activity. Vagotomy affected the LES but not the gastric or diaphragmatic responses to both stimuli. In the group of animals, the combined effect of the changes in the three measured variables on the HPZ resulted in maintenance of the antireflux barrier during abdominal compression but a significant decrease in the barrier during gastric distension.

Diaphragmatic contribution to gastroesophageal competence and reflux in dogs

1992 ◽  
Vol 263 (4) ◽  
pp. G551-G557 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Martin ◽  
W. J. Dodds ◽  
H. H. Liem ◽  
R. O. Dantas ◽  
R. D. layman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Selective Inhibition ◽  
High Amplitude ◽  
Gastric Distension ◽  
Esophageal Body ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Crural Diaphragm

Events associated with gastroesophageal reflux have been determined by concurrent diaphragmatic and esophageal body electromyography, video radiography, and manometry in four conscious dogs. Three characteristic phenomena occurred in parallel immediately before and during gastroesophageal reflux: 1) transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, 2) profound (99.5%) and selective inhibition of crural diaphragmatic activity, and 3) a previously unrecognized dorsal movement of the gastroesophageal junction (mean 1.3 cm) demonstrated by implanted radiological markers. The patterns associated with spontaneous acid and gas reflux were indistinguishable from those induced by gastric distension. Costolumbar diaphragmatic activity was stable up until the instant of sphincter opening, when there was a single costolumbar contraction of short duration and high amplitude. Esophageal shortening did not occur before reflux. Reflux that occurred after atropine-induced inhibition of lower esophageal sphincter tone to < 2 mmHg was intermittent and coincided with selective crural inhibition. These studies demonstrated that selective crural inhibition is a prerequisite for gastroesophageal reflux and suggest that the crural diaphragm is an important factor for the maintenance of gastroesophageal competence.

Regional differences in abdominal pressure swings in dogs

1984 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 1682-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Decramer ◽  
A. De Troyer ◽  
S. Kelly ◽  
L. Zocchi ◽  
P. T. Macklem
Keyword(s):  
Regional Differences ◽  
Abdominal Muscle ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Bilateral Stimulation ◽  
Quiet Breathing ◽  
Gastric Pressure ◽  
Anesthetized Dogs ◽  
Small Change ◽  
Crural Diaphragm ◽  
Stimulation Of

The pressure swings under the costal (Pcos) and crural diaphragms (Pcru) and between the intestinal loops (Pint) were compared with the swings in gastric pressure (Pga) in 13 supine anesthetized dogs. Pcos, Pcru, and Pint were measured with air-filled latex balloons in eight dogs and saline-filled catheters in five. Pga was measured with an air-filled balloon in all dogs. During quiet breathing differences were often present, the directions of which were variable from animal to animal. During mechanical ventilation, all pressures increased, but both Pcos and Pcru increased more than Pga, whereas only a small change was observed in Pint. During bilateral stimulation of the costal diaphragm, Pcos invariably increased more than Pga and Pint, whereas almost no change was observed in Pcru. During bilateral stimulation of the crural diaphragm, Pcru invariably increased more than Pga, Pint, and Pcos. During abdominal muscle stimulation as during external abdominal compression, Pint always increased more than Pcos and Pcru. During lower rib cage compression, Pga, Pcos, and Pcru increased more than Pint. During sternocleidomastoid stimulation, all pressure swings were negative, but the change in Pint was always smaller than in Pcos, Pcru, or Pga. Inhomogeneities observed with balloons and saline-filled catheters were similar. After the abdomen was filled with 2 liters of saline all pressure swings became much more homogeneous.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document