Relationship of osmotic inhibition in thermoregulatory responses and sweat sodium concentration in humans

2001 ◽  
Vol 280 (3) ◽  
pp. R623-R629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Takamata ◽  
Tetsuya Yoshida ◽  
Naoko Nishida ◽  
Taketoshi Morimoto

Heat acclimatization improves thermoregulatory responses to heat stress and decreases sweat sodium concentration ([Na+]sweat). The reduced [Na+]sweat results in a larger increase in plasma osmolality (Posmol) at a given amount of sweat output. The increase in Posmol inhibits thermoregulatory responses to increased body core temperature. Therefore, we hypothesized that the inhibitory effect of plasma hyperosmolality on the thermoregulatory responses to heat stress should be attenuated with the reduction of [Na+]sweat due to heat acclimatization. Eleven subjects (9 male and 2 female) were passively heated by immersing their lower legs into water at 42°C (room temperature 28°C and relative humidity 30%) for 50 min following isotonic or hypertonic saline infusion. We determined the increase in the esophageal temperature (Tes) required to elicit sweating and cutaneous vasodilation (CVD) (ΔTes thresholds for sweating and CVD, respectively) in each condition and calculated the elevation of the Tes thresholds per unit increase in Posmol as the osmotic inhibition of sweating and CVD. The osmotic shift in the ΔTes thresholds for both sweating and CVD correlated linearly with [Na+]sweat( r = 0.858 and r = 0.628, respectively). Thus subjects with a lower [Na+]sweat showed a smaller osmotic elevation of the ΔTes thresholds for sweating and CVD. These results suggest the possibility that heat acclimatization attenuates osmotic inhibition of thermoregulatory responses as well as reducing [Na+]sweat.

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 967-967
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Nuccio ◽  
Meagan O'Connor ◽  
Corey T. Ungaro ◽  
Kelly A. Barnes ◽  
Adam J. Reimel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (11) ◽  
pp. 2873-2881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nassim Hamouti ◽  
Juan Del Coso ◽  
Juan F. Ortega ◽  
Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur R. Bartolozzi ◽  
Sandra Fowkes Godek ◽  
Chris Peduzzi ◽  
Jason Kopec ◽  
Richard Burkholder

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Dziedzic ◽  
Megan L. Ross ◽  
Gary J. Slater ◽  
Louise M. Burke

Context:There is interest in including recommendations for the replacement of the sodium lost in sweat in individualized hydration plans for athletes.Purpose:Although the regional absorbent-patch method provides a practical approach to measuring sweat sodium losses in field conditions, there is a need to understand the variability of estimates associated with this technique.Methods:Sweat samples were collected from the forearms, chest, scapula, and thigh of 12 cyclists during 2 standardized cycling time trials in the heat and 2 in temperate conditions. Single measure analysis of sodium concentration was conducted immediately by ion-selective electrodes (ISE). A subset of 30 samples was frozen for reanalysis of sodium concentration using ISE, flame photometry (FP), and conductivity (SC).Results:Sweat samples collected in hot conditions produced higher sweat sodium concentrations than those from the temperate environment (P= .0032). A significant difference (P= .0048) in estimates of sweat sodium concentration was evident when calculated from the forearm average (mean ± 95% CL; 64 ± 12 mmol/L) compared with using a 4-site equation (70 ± 12 mmol/L). There was a high correlation between the values produced using different analytical techniques (r2= .95), but mean values were different between treatments (frozen FP, frozen SC > immediate ISE > frozen ISE;P< .0001).Conclusion:Whole-body sweat sodium concentration estimates differed depending on the number of sites included in the calculation. Environmental testing conditions should be considered in the interpretation of results. The impact of sample freezing and subsequent analytical technique was small but statistically significant. Nevertheless, when undertaken using a standardized protocol, the regional absorbent-patch method appears to be a relatively robust field test.


Author(s):  
Ashley G.B. Willmott ◽  
Robert Holliss ◽  
Zoe Saynor ◽  
Jo Corbett ◽  
Adam J. Causer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (20) ◽  
pp. 2356-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Barnes ◽  
Melissa L. Anderson ◽  
John R. Stofan ◽  
Kortney J. Dalrymple ◽  
Adam J. Reimel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. e62-e63 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Braconnier ◽  
B. Milani ◽  
N. Loncle ◽  
J.M. Lourenco ◽  
W. Brito ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document