Blood flow restriction training and the high-performance athlete: science to application

Author(s):  
Christopher Pignanelli ◽  
Danny Christiansen ◽  
Jamie F. Burr

The manipulation of blood flow in conjunction with skeletal muscle contraction has greatly informed the physiological understanding of muscle fatigue, blood pressure reflexes, and metabolism in humans. Recent interest in using intentional blood flow restriction (BFR) has focused on elucidating how exercise during periods of reduced blood flow affects typical training adaptations. A large initial appeal for BFR-training was driven by studies demonstrating rapid increases in muscle size, strength, and endurance capacity; even when notably low intensities and resistances, that would typically be incapable of stimulating change in healthy populations, were used. The incorporation of BFR-exercise into the training of strength- and endurance-trained athletes has recently been shown to provide additive training effects that augment skeletal muscle and cardiovascular adaptations. Recent observations suggest BFR-exercise alters acute physiological stressors such as local muscle oxygen availability and vascular shear-stress, which may lead to adaptations that are not easily attained with conventional training. This review explores these concepts and summarizes both the evidence-base and knowledge gaps regarding the application of BFR-training for athletes.

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 1032-1033
Author(s):  
Per Aagaard ◽  
Mikkel Jacobsen ◽  
Kasper Y. Jensen ◽  
Jakob L. Nielsen ◽  
Jens Bülow ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 1288-1296
Author(s):  
Madoka Yoshikawa ◽  
Takeshi Morifuji ◽  
Tomohiro Matsumoto ◽  
Noriaki Maeshige ◽  
Minoru Tanaka ◽  
...  

This study aimed to clarify the effects of a combined treatment comprising blood flow restriction and low-current electrical stimulation on skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats. Male Wistar rats were divided into control (Cont), blood flow restriction (Bfr), electrical stimulation (Es), or Bfr with Es (Bfr + Es) groups. Pressure cuffs (80 mmHg) were placed around the thighs of Bfr and Bfr + Es rats. Low-current Es was applied to calf muscles in the Es and Bfr + Es rats. In experiment 1, a 1-day treatment regimen (5-min stimulation, followed by 5-min rest) was delivered four times to study the acute effects. In experiment 2, the same treatment regimen was delivered three times/wk for 8 wk. Body weight, muscle mass, changes in maximal isometric contraction, fiber cross-sectional area of the soleus muscle, expression of phosphorylated and total-ERK1/2, phosphorylated-rpS6 Ser235/236, phosphorylated and total Akt, and phosphorylated-rpS6 Ser240/244 were measured. Bfr and Es treatment alone failed to induce muscle hypertrophy and increase the expression of phosphorylated rpS6 Ser240/244. Combined Bfr + Es upregulated muscle mass, increased the fiber cross-sectional area, and increased phosphorylated rpS6 Ser240/244 expression and phosphorylated rpS6 Ser235/236 expression compared with controls. Combined treatment with Bfr and low-current Es can induce muscle hypertrophy via activation of two protein synthesis signaling pathways. This treatment should be introduced for older patients with sarcopenia and others with muscle weakness. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We investigated the acute and chronic effect of low-current electrical stimulation with blood flow restriction on skeletal muscle hypertrophy and the mechanisms controlling the hypertrophic response. Low-current electrical stimulation could not induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy, but a combination treatment did. Blood lactate and growth hormone levels were increased in the early response. Moreover, activation of ERK1/2 and mTOR pathways were observed in both the acute and chronic response, which contribute to muscle hypertrophy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P18 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O'Halloran ◽  
Bill Campbell ◽  
Nicholas Martinez ◽  
Shane O’Connor ◽  
Jonathan Fuentes ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document