scholarly journals Effects of bilateral priming on motor cortex function in healthy adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 2858-2867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry T. Jordan ◽  
Cathy M. Stinear
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Intracortical Facilitation ◽  
Corticomotor Excitability ◽  
Neurophysiological Mechanisms ◽  
Posterior Anterior ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Bilateral priming is a rehabilitation adjuvant that can improve upper limb motor recovery poststroke. It uses a table-top device to couple the upper limbs together such that active flexion and extension of one wrist leads to passive movement of the opposite wrist in a mirror symmetric pattern. Bilateral priming increases corticomotor excitability (CME) in the primary motor cortex (M1) of the passively driven wrist; however, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this increase remain unclear. This study explored these mechanisms by using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right M1 and recording motor-evoked potentials from the passively driven left extensor carpi radialis of healthy adults. Intracortical measures were recorded before and 5 and 35 min after a single 15-min session of priming. One-millisecond short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, late cortical disinhibition (LCD), and intracortical facilitation were recorded with a posterior-anterior (PA) intracortical current, whereas CME and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) were recorded with both PA and anterior-posterior (AP) currents. CME with PA stimulation was also recorded ~1 h postpriming. PA CME was elevated 35 min postpriming and remained elevated ~1 h postpriming. LCD decreased, and AP SICF increased at both 5 and 35 min postpriming. However, these changes in LCD and AP SICF are unlikely to be the cause of the increased PA CME because of the differing timelines of their effects and AP and PA currents activating separate interneuron circuits. These results suggest that bilateral priming does not increase CME through alterations of the intracortical circuits investigated here. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to measure how bilateral priming modulates corticomotor excitability with posterior-anterior and anterior-posterior intracortical currents, 1-ms short-interval intracortical inhibition, late cortical disinhibition, intracortical facilitation, and short-interval intracortical facilitation. We found corticomotor excitability with a posterior-anterior current increased by 35 min until ~1 h postpriming. Short-interval intracortical facilitation with an anterior-posterior current was greater for at least 35 min postpriming. This provides further insight into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying bilateral priming.

scholarly journals Modulation of Motor Cortex Plasticity by Repetitive Paired-Pulse TMS at Late I-Wave Intervals Is Influenced by Intracortical Excitability

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
George M. Opie ◽  
Ryoki Sasaki ◽  
Brodie J. Hand ◽  
John G. Semmler
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Individual Variations ◽  
Intracortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortex Plasticity ◽  
Posterior Anterior ◽  
Anterior Posterior

The late indirect (I)-waves recruited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) can be modulated using I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS). The purpose of this study was to determine if the response to iTMS is influenced by different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) targeting late I-waves, and whether these responses were associated with individual variations in intracortical excitability. Seventeen young (27.2 ± 6.4 years, 12 females) healthy adults received iTMS at late I-wave intervals (4.0, 4.5, and 5.0 ms) in three separate sessions. Changes due to each intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) using both posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) TMS current directions. Changes in MEP amplitude and SICF were influenced by iTMS ISI, with the greatest facilitation for ISIs at 4 and 5 ms with PA TMS, and 4 ms with AP TMS. Maximum SICF at baseline (irrespective of ISI) was associated with increased iTMS response, but only for PA stimulation. These results suggest that modifying iTMS parameters targeting late I-waves can influence M1 plasticity. They also suggest that maximum SICF may be a means by which responders to iTMS targeting the late I-waves could be identified.

Influence of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition on Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation in Human Primary Motor Cortex

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 1382-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Shirota ◽  
Masashi Hamada ◽  
Yasuo Terao ◽  
Hideyuki Matsumoto ◽  
Shinya Ohminami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Conditioning Stimulus ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Intracortical Facilitation ◽  
Paired Pulse ◽  
Active Motor ◽  
Second Peak ◽  
Pulse Stimulation

Using the paired-pulse paradigm, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has revealed much about the human primary motor cortex (M1). A preceding subthreshold conditioning stimulus (CS) inhibits the excitability of the motor cortex, which is named short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). In contrast, facilitation is observed when the first pulse (S1) is followed by a second one at threshold (S2), named short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF). SICI and SICF have been considered to be mediated by different neural circuits within M1, but more recent studies reported relations between them. In this study, we performed triple-pulse stimulation consisting of CS-S1-S2 to further explore putative interactions between these two effects. Three intensities of CS (80–120% of active motor threshold: AMT) and two intensities of S2 (120 and 140% AMT) were combined. The SICF in the paired-pulse paradigm exhibited clear facilitatory peaks at ISIs of 1.5 and 3 ms. The second peak at 3 ms was significantly suppressed by triple-pulse stimulation using 120% AMT CS, although the first peak was almost unaffected. Our present results obtained using triple-pulse stimulation suggest that each peak of SICF is differently modulated by different intensities of CS. The suppression of the second peak might be ascribed to the findings in the paired-pulse paradigm that CS mediates SICI by inhibiting later I waves such as I3 waves and that the second peak of SICF is most probably related to I3 waves. We propose that CS might inhibit the second peak of SICF at the interneurons responsible for I3 waves.

scholarly journals Modulation of motor cortex plasticity by repetitive paired-pulse TMS at late I-wave intervals is influenced by intracortical excitability

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
George M Opie ◽  
Ryoki Sasaki ◽  
Brodie J Hand ◽  
John G Semmler
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Individual Variations ◽  
Intracortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Cortex Plasticity ◽  
Posterior Anterior ◽  
Anterior Posterior

AbstractThe late indirect (I) waves recruited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) can be modulated using I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS). The purpose of this study was to determine if the response to iTMS is influenced by different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) targeting late I-waves, and whether these responses were associated with individual variations in intracortical excitability. 17 young (27.2 ± 6.4 years, 12 females) healthy adults received iTMS at late I-wave intervals (4.0, 4.5 & 5.0 ms) in three separate sessions. Changes due to each intervention were examined with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) using both posterior-anterior (PA) and anterior-posterior (AP) TMS current directions. Changes in MEP amplitude and SICF were influenced by iTMS ISI, with the greatest facilitation for ISIs at 4 and 5 ms with PA TMS, and 4 ms with AP TMS. Maximum SICF at baseline (irrespective of ISI) was associated with increased iTMS response, but only for PA stimulation. These results suggest that modifying iTMS parameters targeting late I-waves can influence M1 plasticity. They also suggest that maximum SICF may be a means by which responders to iTMS targeting the late I-waves could be identified.

Intracortical Inhibition During Volitional Inhibition of Prepared Action

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 3371-3383 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Coxon ◽  
Cathy M. Stinear ◽  
Winston D. Byblow
Keyword(s):  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Corticomotor Excitability ◽  
Hand Muscles ◽  
Cortical Level ◽  
A Site ◽  
Intrinsic Hand Muscles ◽  
Inhibitory Networks

Volitional inhibition is the voluntary prevention of a prepared movement. Here we ask whether primary motor cortex (M1) is a site of convergence of cortical activity associated with movement preparation and volitional inhibition. Volitional inhibition was studied by presenting a stop signal before execution of an anticipated response that requires a key lift to intercept a revolving dial. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited in intrinsic hand muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess corticomotor excitability and short interval intracortical inhibition (sICI) during task performance. The closer the stop cue was presented to the anticipated response, the harder it was for subjects to inhibit their response. Corticomotor pathway excitability was temporally modulated during volitional inhibition. Using subthreshold TMS, corticomotor excitability was reduced for Stop trials relative to Go trials from 140 ms after the cue. sICI was significantly greater for Stop trials compared with Go trials at a time that preceded the onset of muscle activity associated with the anticipated response. These results provide evidence that volitional inhibition is exerted at a cortical level and that inhibitory networks within M1 contribute to volitional inhibition of prepared action.

scholarly journals Short-interval intracortical inhibition in human primary motor cortex: A multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation study

NeuroImage ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 116194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaakko O. Nieminen ◽  
Lari M. Koponen ◽  
Niko Mäkelä ◽  
Victor Hugo Souza ◽  
Matti Stenroos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition

Event-related desynchronization reflects downregulation of intracortical inhibition in human primary motor cortex

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 1158-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuaki Takemi ◽  
Yoshihisa Masakado ◽  
Meigen Liu ◽  
Junichi Ushiba
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Imagery ◽  
Sensorimotor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Intracortical Inhibition ◽  
Imagery Task ◽  
Event Related Desynchronization

There is increasing interest in electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) as a tool for rehabilitation of upper limb motor functions in hemiplegic stroke patients. This type of BCI often exploits mu and beta oscillations in EEG recorded over the sensorimotor areas, and their event-related desynchronization (ERD) following motor imagery is believed to represent increased sensorimotor cortex excitability. However, it remains unclear whether the sensorimotor cortex excitability is actually correlated with ERD. Thus we assessed the association of ERD with primary motor cortex (M1) excitability during motor imagery of right wrist movement. M1 excitability was tested by motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Twenty healthy participants were recruited. The participants performed 7 s of rest followed by 5 s of motor imagery and received online visual feedback of the ERD magnitude of the contralateral hand M1 while performing the motor imagery task. TMS was applied to the right hand M1 when ERD exceeded predetermined thresholds during motor imagery. MEP amplitudes, SICI, and ICF were recorded from the agonist muscle of the imagined hand movement. Results showed that the large ERD during wrist motor imagery was associated with significantly increased MEP amplitudes and reduced SICI but no significant changes in ICF. Thus ERD magnitude during wrist motor imagery represents M1 excitability. This study provides electrophysiological evidence that a motor imagery task involving ERD may induce changes in corticospinal excitability similar to changes accompanying actual movements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document