scholarly journals The neural bases of different levels of action understanding

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 1085-1087
Author(s):  
Michelle Marneweck ◽  
Ann-Maree Vallence

Many have recently questioned whether all levels of actions understanding, from lower kinematic levels to the higher goal or intention levels of action understanding, are processed in the action observation network (a network of neurons that are active during action execution and observation). A recent study by Wurm and Lingnau ( J Neurosci 35: 7727–7735, 2015) gave evidence to the contrary, by showing that higher levels of action understanding are processed in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex. An important next step is to differentiate between the role of the lateral occipitotemporal cortex in processing the visual form of an observed action and the goal of an observed action.

Author(s):  
Karine Jospe ◽  
Agnes Flöel ◽  
Michal Lavidor

Abstract. Research suggests that the action-observation network is involved in both emotional-embodiment (empathy) and action-embodiment (imitation) mechanisms. Here we tested whether empathy modulates action-embodiment, hypothesizing that restricting imitation abilities will impair performance in a hand gesture comprehension task. Moreover, we hypothesized that empathy levels will modulate the imitation restriction effect. One hundred twenty participants with a range of empathy scores performed gesture comprehension under restricted and unrestricted hand conditions. Empathetic participants performed better under the unrestricted compared to the restricted condition, and compared to the low empathy participants. Remarkably however, the latter showed the exactly opposite pattern and performed better under the restricted condition. This pattern was not found in a facial expression recognition task. The selective interaction of embodiment restriction and empathy suggests that empathy modulates the way people employ embodiment in gesture comprehension. We discuss the potential of embodiment-induced therapy to improve empathetic abilities in individuals with low empathy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (18) ◽  
pp. 5199-5214
Author(s):  
Yin‐Hua Chen ◽  
Chih‐Yen Chang ◽  
Shih‐Kuei Huang ◽  
Nai‐Shing Yen

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 3434-3444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Vannuscorps ◽  
Moritz F Wurm ◽  
Ella Striem-Amit ◽  
Alfonso Caramazza

Abstract The human high-level visual cortex comprises regions specialized for the processing of distinct types of stimuli, such as objects, animals, and human actions. How does this specialization emerge? Here, we investigated the role of effector-specific visuomotor coupling experience in shaping the organization of the action observation network (AON) as a window on this question. Observed body movements are frequently coupled with corresponding motor codes, e.g., during monitoring one’s own movements and imitation, resulting in bidirectionally connected circuits between areas involved in body movements observation (e.g., of the hand) and the motor codes involved in their execution. If the organization of the AON is shaped by this effector-specific visuomotor coupling, then, it should not form for body movements that do not belong to individuals’ motor repertoire. To test this prediction, we used fMRI to investigate the spatial arrangement and functional properties of the hand and foot action observation circuits in individuals born without upper limbs. Multivoxel pattern decoding, pattern similarity, and univariate analyses revealed an intact hand AON in the individuals born without upper limbs. This suggests that the organization of the AON does not require effector-specific visuomotor coupling.


2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (4_Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 7111505148p1
Author(s):  
Kaori L. Ito ◽  
Sook-Lei Liew ◽  
Kathleen Alice Garrison ◽  
Panthea Heydari ◽  
Mona Sobhani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gloria Pizzamiglio ◽  
Zuo Zhang ◽  
James Kolasinski ◽  
Jane M. Riddoch ◽  
Richard E. Passingham ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyuki Tamura ◽  
Yoshiya Moriguchi ◽  
Shigekazu Higuchi ◽  
Akiko Hida ◽  
Minori Enomoto ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Shaw ◽  
Marie-Helene Grosbras ◽  
Gabriel Leonard ◽  
G. Bruce Pike ◽  
Tomáš Paus

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 668-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Turella ◽  
Federico Tubaldi ◽  
Michael Erb ◽  
Wolfgang Grodd ◽  
Umberto Castiello

Author(s):  
Davide Albertini ◽  
Marco Lanzilotto ◽  
Monica Maranesi ◽  
Luca Bonini

The neural processing of others' observed actions recruits a large network of brain regions (the action observation network, AON), in which frontal motor areas are thought to play a crucial role. Since the discovery of mirror neurons (MNs) in the ventral premotor cortex, it has been assumed that their activation was conditional upon the presentation of biological rather than nonbiological motion stimuli, supporting a form of direct visuomotor matching. Nonetheless, nonbiological observed movements have rarely been used as control stimuli to evaluate visual specificity, thereby leaving the issue of similarity among neural codes for executed actions and biological or nonbiological observed movements unresolved. Here, we addressed this issue by recording from two nodes of the AON that are attracting increasing interest, namely the ventro-rostral part of the dorsal premotor area F2 and the mesial pre-supplementary motor area F6 of macaques while they 1) executed a reaching-grasping task, 2) observed an experimenter performing the task, and 3) observed a nonbiological effector moving in the same context. Our findings revealed stronger neuronal responses to the observation of biological than nonbiological movement, but biological and nonbiological visual stimuli produced highly similar neural dynamics and relied on largely shared neural codes, which in turn remarkably differed from those associated with executed actions. These results indicate that, in highly familiar contexts, visuo-motor remapping processes in premotor areas hosting MNs are more complex and flexible than predicted by a direct visuomotor matching hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document