Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in binocular visual cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and binocular properties

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1162-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Area ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. In fully awake rabbits the stability of the two eyes was monitored and was sufficient to enable receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in the binocular segment of visual area 1. Efferent neurons analyzed included callosal efferent neurons (CC neurons, n = 52), neurons projecting to visual area 2 (CV2 neurons, n = 35), corticotectal neurons (CT neurons, n = 43), and corticogeniculate neurons (CG neurons, n = 51). Six additional neurons projected a branching axon to both the corpus callosum and visual area 2. 2. Most CC and CV2 neurons were found in layer 2-3 and had receptive fields of the simple type. Only two corticocortical neurons with complex receptive fields were found. Orientation tuning ranges of CC and CV2 simple cells were similar and end stopping was prevalent in both CC (62%) and CV2 (45%) neurons. Axonal conduction velocities of CC and CV2 neurons were low (mean = 3.5 and 1.4 m/s, respectively) and visually nonresponsive CC neurons (19%) had conduction velocities that were significantly lower than visually responsive neurons. Spontaneous firing rates of corticocortical neurons were low (mean less than 1 spike/s) and these neurons responded to a lower range of stimulus velocities than did corticofugal neurons. 3. Most CG neurons had simple receptive fields and none had a complex field. Orientation tuning ranges of these neurons were comparable to those of CC and CV2 neurons, but a significantly smaller proportion (12%) were end stopped. Both spontaneous firing rates (mean = less than 1 spike/s) and axonal conduction velocities (mean = 2.4 m/s) of CG neurons were low and, as was found for CC neurons, visually nonresponsive CG neurons (25%) had significantly lower conduction velocities than did visually responsive neurons. 4. CT neurons had receptive fields that were predominantly complex (37%), motion/uniform (28%), or simple (26%). Conduction velocities (mean = 10.9 m/s) and spontaneous firing rates (mean = 7 spikes/s) of CT neurons of all receptive-field types were much higher than those of CC, CV2, and CG neurons. 5. An additional class of neurons was studied that responded synaptically at a short latency to electrical stimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600-900 Hz. These neurons showed a high degree of synaptic convergence, also responding synaptically with a high-frequency burst of spikes to stimulation of both visual area 2 and the corpus callosum.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in motor cortex of the awake rabbit: axonal properties, sensory receptive fields, and subthreshold synaptic inputs

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Properties of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the cortical representation of the vibrissae, sinus hairs, and philtrum were examined in motor cortex of fully awake adult rabbits. Efferent neurons were tested for both receptive field and axonal properties and included callosal (CC) neurons (n = 31), ipsilateral corticocortical (C-IC) neurons (n = 34) that project to primary somatosensory cortex (S-1), and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5) (n = 33) and layer 6 (CF-6) (n = 32) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. Appropriate collision tests demonstrated that substantial numbers of corticocortical efferent neurons project an axon to both the corpus callosum and to ipsilateral S-1. 2. Suspected interneurons (SINs, n = 37) were also studied. These neurons were not activated antidromically from any stimulus site but did respond synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrolateral (VL) thalamus and/or S-1 with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies from 600 to > 900 Hz. All of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of the corpus callosum. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter in duration (mean = 0.48 ms), than those of efferent neurons (mean = 0.90 ms). 3. CF-5 neurons differed from CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons in their spontaneous firing rates, axonal properties, and receptive field properties. Whereas CF-5 neurons had a mean spontaneous firing rate of 4.1 spikes/s, CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons all had mean values of < 1 spike/s. Axonal conduction velocities of CF-5 neurons were much higher (mean = 12.76 m/s) than either CC (1.47 m/s), C-IC (0.97 m/s), or CF-6 (mean = 1.96 m/s) neurons. A decrease in antidromic latency (the "supernormal" period) followed a single prior impulse in most CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons but was minimal or absent in CF-5 neurons. Although all but two CF-5 neurons responded to peripheral sensory stimulation, many CC (35%), C-IC (59%), or CF-6 (66%) neurons did not. CC, CF-5, and CF-6 neurons that did not respond to sensory stimulation had significantly lower axonal conduction velocities and spontaneous firing rates than those that responded to such stimulation. 4. Sensory receptive fields of neurons in motor cortex were considerably larger than those observed in S-1 but were similar in size to those seen in secondary somatosensory cortex (S-2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 forelimb representation of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1477-1498 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Receptive Field Properties ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Receptive-field properties of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the cutaneous forelimb representation of primary somatosensory cortex (S-1) were examined in fully awake rabbits. Efferent neurons studied included callosal neurons (CC neurons, n = 52), ipsilateral corticocortical neurons (C-IC neurons, n = 48) that project to or beyond the second somatosensory cortical area (S-2), and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5 neurons, n = 97) and layer 6 (CF-6 neurons, n = 59) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. 2. An additional class of neurons was studied that was not activated antidromically from any stimulus site, but which responded synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600 to greater than 900 Hz. Most of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of S-2 and the corpus callosum. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter (mean = 0.45 ms) than those of efferent neurons (mean = 0.95 ms). Such properties have been associated with interneurons found throughout the central nervous system, and these neurons are thereby referred to as suspected interneurons (SINs). 3. CF-5 neurons differed from CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons in their spontaneous firing rates, axonal properties, and receptive-field properties. Whereas CF-5 neurons had a mean spontaneous firing rate of 5.5 spikes/s, CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons had mean values of less than 1/s. Axonal conduction velocities of CF-5 neurons were much higher (mean = 12.92 m/s) than either CC (mean = 2.15 m/s), C-IC (mean = 1.31 m/s), or CF-6 (mean = 2.53 m/s) neurons. A decrease in antidromic latency (the "supernormal" period) that was dependent on prior impulse activity was seen in the great majority of CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons but was either minimal or absent in CF-5 neurons of comparable conduction velocity. A higher proportion of CF-5 neurons (98%) responded to peripheral sensory stimulation than did either CC (75%), C-IC (71%), or CF-6 (51%) neurons. CF-6 and C-IC neurons that did not respond to sensory stimulation had significantly lower axonal conduction velocities and spontaneous firing rates than those that responded to such stimulation. 4. Cutaneous receptive fields were seen in most neurons that could be driven by peripheral stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Corticogeniculate neurons, corticotectal neurons, and suspected interneurons in visual cortex of awake rabbits: receptive-field properties, axonal properties, and effects of EEG arousal

1987 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 977-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow ◽  
T. G. Weyand
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Stimulation Of

The intrinsic stability of the rabbit eye was exploited to enable receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified corticotectal (CT) neurons (n = 101) and corticogeniculate (CG) neurons (n = 124) in visual area I of awake rabbits. Eye position was monitored to within 1/5 degrees. We also studied the receptive-field properties of neurons synaptically activated via electrical stimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd). Whereas most CT neurons had either complex (59%) or motion/uniform (15%) receptive fields, we also found CT neurons with simple (9%) and concentric (4%) receptive fields. Most complex CT cells were broadly tuned to both stimulus orientation and velocity, but only 41% of these cells were directionally selective. We could elicit no visual responses from 6% of CT cells, and these cells had significantly lower conduction velocities than visually responsive CT cells. The median spontaneous firing rates for all classes of CT neurons were 4-8 spikes/s. CG neurons had primarily simple (60%) and concentric (9%) receptive fields, and none of these cells had complex receptive fields. CG simple cells were more narrowly tuned to both stimulus orientation and velocity than were complex CT cells, and most (85%) were directionally selective. Axonal conduction velocities of CG neurons (mean = 1.2 m/s) were much lower than those of CT neurons (mean = 6.4 m/s), and CG neurons that were visually unresponsive (23%) had lower axonal conduction velocities than did visually responsive CG neurons. Some visually unresponsive CG neurons (14%) responded with saccadic eye movements. The median spontaneous firing rates for all classes of CG neurons were less than 1 spike/s. All neurons synaptically activated via LGNd stimulation at latencies of less than 2.0 ms had receptive fields that were not orientation selective (89% motion/uniform, 11% concentric), whereas most cells with orientation-selective receptive fields had considerably longer synaptic latencies. Most short-latency motion/uniform neurons responded to electrical stimulation of the LGNd (and visual area II) with a high-frequency burst (500-900 Hz) of three or more spikes. Action potentials of these neurons were of short duration, thresholds of synaptic activation were low, and spontaneous firing rates were the highest seen in rabbit visual cortex. These properties are similar to those reported for interneurons in several regions in mammalian central nervous system. Nonvisual sensory stimuli that resulted in electroencephalographic arousal (hippocampal theta activity) had a profound effect on the visual responses of many visual cortical neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in second somatosensory cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1392-1409 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Swadlow
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Corpus Callosum ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Sensory Stimulation ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Axonal Conduction ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Receptive-field properties of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the representation of vibrissae and sinus hairs above the mouth were examined in secondary somatosensory cortex (S-2) of fully awake adult rabbits. Efferent neurons studied included callosal neurons (CC neurons, n = 88), ipsilateral corticocortical neurons (C-IC neurons, n = 51) that project to primary somatosensory cortex (S-1), and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5 neurons, n = 63) and layer 6 (CF-6 neurons, n = 42) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. Appropriate collision tests demonstrated that substantial numbers of corticocortical efferent neurons (21 of 113 tested) project an axon to both the corpus callosum and to ipsilateral S-1. 2. Suspected interneurons (SINs, n = 62) were also studied. These neurons were not activated antidromically from any stimulus site but did respond synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600 to greater than 900 Hz. Most of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of S-1 and the corpus callosum. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter (mean, 0.49 ms) than those of efferent neurons (mean, 1.01 ms). 3. CF-5 neurons differed from CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons in their spontaneous firing rates, axonal properties, and receptive-field properties. Whereas CF-5 neurons had a mean spontaneous firing rate of 5.7 spikes/s, CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons all had mean values of less than 1/s. Axonal conduction velocities of CF-5 neurons were much higher (mean, 11.90 m/s) than either CC (mean, 2.63 m/s), C-IC (mean, 0.86 m/s), or CF-6 (mean, 1.73 m/s) neurons. A decrease in antidromic latency (the "supernormal" period), which was dependent on prior impulse activity, was seen in most CC, C-IC, and CF-6 neurons but was minimal or absent in CF-5 neurons of comparable conduction velocity. Although all CF-5 neurons responded to peripheral sensory stimulation, many CC (52%), C-IC (49%), and CF-6 (55%) neurons did not. CC and CF-6 neurons that did not respond to sensory stimulation had significantly lower axonal conduction velocities and spontaneous firing rates than those that responded to such stimulation. Whereas no CC, C-IC, or CF-6 neuron responded synaptically to callosal stimulation, 43% of CF-5 neurons (and 78% of SINs) did so respond. Similar differences in synaptic responsivity to stimulation of S-1 were seen in these populations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Selective Attention in Areas V1, V2, and V4 of Macaque Visual Cortex

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Luck ◽  
Leonardo Chelazzi ◽  
Steven A. Hillyard ◽  
Robert Desimone
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Simultaneous Presentation ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Spontaneous Firing ◽  
Firing Rates ◽  
Behavioral Paradigm ◽  
Sensory Responses

Luck, Steven J., Leonardo Chelazzi, Steven A. Hillyard, and Robert Desimone. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 24–42, 1997. Many neurons in extrastriate visual cortex have large receptive fields, and this may lead to significant computational problems whenever multiple stimuli fall within a single field. Previous studies have suggested that when multiple stimuli fall within a cell's receptive field, they compete for the cell's response in a manner that can be biased in favor of attended stimuli. In the present study we examined this role of attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque monkeys with the use of a behavioral paradigm in which attention was directed to one of two stimulus locations. When two stimuli were presented simultaneously inside the cell's receptive field (which could be accomplished only in areas V2 and V4), we found that the cell's response was strongly influenced by which of the two stimuli was attended. The size of this attention effect was reduced when the attended and ignored stimuli were presented sequentially rather than simultaneously. In addition, the effects became very weak and inconsistent in these areas when only one of the two stimuli was located inside the receptive field. Attention thus modulated sensory responses primarily when two or more simultaneous stimuli competed for access to a neuron's receptive field. As in areas V2 and V4, attention did not modulate sensory responses in area V1 when only a single stimulus was inside the receptive field. In addition, the small receptive fields in this area precluded the simultaneous presentation of attended and ignored stimuli inside the receptive field, making it impossible to determine whether attention effects would be observed under the conditions that led to consistent attention effects in areas V2 and V4. Spontaneous firing rates in areas V2 and V4 were found to be 30–40% higher when attention was directed inside rather than outside the receptive field, even when no stimulus was present in the receptive field. Spontaneous firing rates also varied according to the particular location within the receptive field that was attended. These shifts in spontaneous activity may reflect a top-down signal that biases responses in favor of stimuli at the attended location.

Changes in the response properties of neurons in the ventroposterior lateral thalamic nucleus of the raccoon after peripheral deafferentation

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 2441-2450 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Rasmusson
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Thalamic Nucleus ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Sensory Pathways ◽  
Average Latency ◽  
Somatotopic Map ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Single neurons in the ventroposterior lateral thalamic nucleus were studied in 10 anesthetized raccoons, 4 of which had undergone amputation of the fourth digit 4-5 mo before recording. Neurons with receptive fields on the glabrous skin of a forepaw digit were examined in response to electrical stimulation of the “on-focus” digit that contained the neuron's receptive field and stimulation of an adjacent, “off-focus” digit. 2. In normal raccoons all neurons responded to on-focus stimulation with an excitation at a short latency (mean 13 ms), whereas only 63% of the neurons responded to off-focus digit stimulation. The off-focus responses had a longer latency (mean 27.2 ms) and a higher threshold than the on-focus responses (800 and 452 microA, respectively). Only 3 of 32 neurons tested with off-focus stimulation had both a latency and a threshold within the range of on-focus values. Inhibition following the excitation was seen in the majority of neurons with both types of stimulation. 3. In the raccoons with digit removal, the region of the thalamus that had lost its major peripheral input (the “deafferented” region) was distinguished from the normal third and fifth digit regions on the basis of the sequence of neuronal receptive fields within a penetration and receptive field size as described previously. 4. Almost all of the neurons in the deafferented region (91%) were excited by stimulation of one or both adjacent digits. The average latency for these responses was shorter (15.3 ms) and the threshold was lower than was the case with off-focus stimulation in control animals. These values were not significantly different from the responses to on-focus stimulation in the animals with digit amputation. 5. These results confirm that reorganization of sensory pathways can be observed at the thalamic level. In addition to the changes in the somatotopic map that have been shown previously with the use of mechanical stimuli, the present paper demonstrates an improvement in several quantitative measures of single-unit responses. Many of these changes suggest that this reorganization could be explained by an increased effectiveness of preexisting, weak connections from the off-focus digits; however, the increase in the proportion of neurons responding to stimulation of adjacent digits may indicate that sprouting of new connections also occurs.

scholarly journals Cutaneous stimulation evokes long-lasting excitation of spinal interneurons in the turtle

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1134-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Currie ◽  
P. S. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Action Potential ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Cutaneous Afferents ◽  
Cutaneous Stimulation ◽  
Single Action ◽  
Single Action Potential ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. We demonstrated multisecond increases in the excitability of the rostral-scratch reflex in the turtle by electrically stimulating the shell at sites within the rostral-scratch receptive field. To examine the cellular mechanisms for these multisecond increases in scratch excitability, we recorded from single cutaneous afferents and sensory interneurons that responded to stimulation of the shell within the rostral-scratch receptive field. A single segment of the midbody spinal cord (D4, the 4th postcervical segment) was isolated in situ by transecting the spinal cord at the segment's anterior and posterior borders. The isolated segment was left attached to its peripheral nerve that innervates part of the rostral-scratch receptive field. A microsuction electrode (4-5 microns ID) was used to record extracellularly from the descending axons of cutaneous afferents and interneurons in the spinal white matter at the posterior end of the D4 segment. 2. The turtle shell is innervated by slowly and rapidly adapting cutaneous afferents. All cutaneous afferents responded to a single electrical stimulus to the shell with a single action potential. Maintained mechanical stimulation applied to the receptive field of some slowly adapting afferents produced several seconds of afterdischarge at stimulus offset. We refer to the cutaneous afferent afterdischarge caused by mechanical stimulation of the shell as "peripheral afterdischarge." 3. Within the D4 spinal segment there were some interneurons that responded to a brief mechanical stimulus within their receptive fields on the shell with short afterdischarge and others that responded with long afterdischarge. Short-afterdischarge interneurons responded to a single electrical pulse to a site in their receptive fields either with a brief train of action potentials or with a single action potential. Long-afterdischarge interneurons responded to a single electrical shell stimulus with up to 30 s of afterdischarge. Long-afterdischarge interneurons also exhibited strong temporal summation in response to a pair of electrical shell stimuli delivered up to several seconds apart. Because all cutaneous afferents responded to an electrical shell stimulus with a single action potential, we conclude that electrically evoked afterdischarge in interneurons was produced by neural mechanisms in the spinal cord; we refer to this type of afterdischarge as "central afterdischarge." 4. These results demonstrate that neural mechanisms for long-lasting excitability changes in response to cutaneous stimulation reside in a single segment of the spinal cord. Cutaneous interneurons with long afterdischarge may serve as cellular loci for multise

Response properties and synaptic connections of mechanoafferent neurons in cerebral ganglion of Aplysia

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 954-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Rosen ◽  
K. R. Weiss ◽  
I. Kupfermann
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cerebral Ganglion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Sensory Response ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Dorsal Portion ◽  
Intracellular Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The cells of two clusters of small neurons on the ventrocaudal surface of each hemicerebral ganglion of Aplysia were found to exhibit action potentials following tactile stimuli applied to the skin of the head. These neurons appear to be mechanosensory afferents since they possess axons in the nerves innervating the skin and tactile stimulation evokes spikes with no prepotentials, even when the cell bodies are sufficiently hyperpolarized to block some spikes. The mechanosensory afferents may be primary afferents since the sensory response persists after chemical synaptic transmission is blocked by bathing the ganglion and peripheral structures in seawater with a high-Mg2+ and low-Ca2+ content. 2. The mechanosensory afferents are normally silent and are insensitive to photic, thermal, and chemical stimuli. A punctate tactile stimulus applied to a circumscribed region of skin can evoke a burst of spikes. If the stimulus is maintained at a constant forces, the mechanosensory response slowly adapts over a period of seconds. Repeated brief stimuli have little or no effect on spike frequency within a burst. 3. Approximately 81% of the mechanoafferent neurons have a single ipsilateral receptive field. The fields are located on the lips, the anterior tentacles, the dorsal portion of the head, the neck, or the perioral zone. Because many cells have collateral axons in the cerebral connectives, receptive fields elsewhere on the body are a possibility. The highest receptive-field density was associated with the lips. Within each area, receptive fields vary in size and shape. Adjacent fields overlap and larger fields frequently encompass several smaller ones. The features of some fields appear invariant from one animal to the next. A loose form of topographic organization of the mechanoafferent cells was observed. For example, cells located in the medial cluster have lip receptive fields, and most cells in the posterolateral portion of the lateral clusters have tentacle receptive fields. 4. Intracellular stimulation of individual mechanoafferents evokes short and constant-latency EPSPs in putative motor neurons comprising the identified B-cell clusters of the cerebral ganglion. On the basis of several criteria, these EPSPs appear to be several criteria, these EPSPs appear to be chemically mediated and are monosynaptic. 5. Repetitive intracellular stimulation of individual mechanoafferent neurons at low rates results in a gradual decrement in the amplitude of the EPSPs evoked in B cluster neurons. EPSP amplitude can be restored following brief periods of rest, but subsequent stimulation leads to further diminution of the response. 6. A decremented response cannot be restored by strong mechanical stimulation outside the receptive field of the mechanoafferent or by electrical stimulation of the cerebral nerves or connectives...

Lateral cervical nucleus in the cat: functional organization and characteristics

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1511-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Craig ◽  
D. N. Tapper
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Receptor Type ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Lateral Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The lateral cervical nucleus (LCN) was investigated with extracellular recordings in the anesthetized cat. A total of 556 LCN units were characterized; the locations of most of these were histologically verified. Half of these had receptive fields on the rostral third of the ipsilateral body surface including the face; 14% had fields on the thorax or abdomen, 33% had fields on the hindlimb or tail, and about 3% had receptive fields larger than one limb. 2. The LCN was observed to be somatotopically organized in experiments using angled microelectrode penetrations. Hindlimb units were dorsolateral, forelimb units ventromedial, and face units most medial within the LCN. In regions where LCN cells were present only in the medial portion of the dorsolateral funiculus, they were all forelimb units. 3. A special subpopulation (17%) of cells were clustered most ventromedially in the LCN. These units had large or disjoint receptive fields, and/or responded to deep, visceral, or noxious stimulation. A third of these did not project in the medial lemniscus (ML); many were synaptically activated by stimulation of the ML. Those that did project in the ML had significantly longer latencies than all other LCN units. It is suggested that this subpopulation contains local LCN interneurons. 4. The specific mechanoreceptor inputs were identified for each of 121 projecting LCN units. Receptor inputs were uniform across each receptive field; that is, each unit that responded to a given receptor type was observed to respond to receptors of that type throughout its receptive field. Input from large-fiber-diameter, velocity-sensitive mechanoreceptors was predominant. The absence of input from slowly adapting type I and II receptors and from joint receptors was confirmed. A significant number of units (17.3%) could be driven by only one receptor type. The LCN sample profile agrees closely with the receptor representation in the hindlimb portion of the spinocervical tract. It is concluded that these data that anatomic specification of convergence occurs in the LCN with respect to receptor connectivity, and that this specification originates in lamina IV of the dorsal horn. 5. Stimulation of the dorsal column nuclei synaptically excited 23% of the LCN units tested. In two cases it was possible to demonstrate, by collision, that this occurred via collaterals of spinocervical tract axons. It is concluded that some spinocervical axons have collaterals terminating in the rostral parts of the dorsal column nuclei.

Functional properties of retinal ganglion cells during optic nerve regeneration in the goldfish

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1145-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-J. OH ◽  
D.P.M. NORTHMORE
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Optic Tract ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Antidromic Activation ◽  
Discharge Rates ◽  
Conduction Velocities ◽  
Maintained Discharge ◽  
Retinotectal System

After being severed, optic axons in goldfish regenerate and eventually restore the retinotectal map; refinement of the map depends upon impulse activity generated by the ganglion cells. Because little is known about the changes in activity and receptive-field properties of ganglion cells during regeneration, we made extracellular recordings from them in the intact eye up to 95 days after sectioning their axons in the optic tract. Their receptive fields were classified as OFF-, ON–OFF-, or ON-centers, and their axonal conduction velocities measured by antidromic activation. The rate of encountering single units dropped drastically at 4–8 days postsection when only a few OFF-center units could be recorded, recovering to normal between 42 and 63 days. Receptive-field centers were normal in size, except for the few OFF-centers at 4–8 days which were abnormally large. Maintained discharge rates of all types were depressed up to 42 days, but ON–OFF-center units were more spontaneously active than normal around 42 days. Light-evoked responses in OFF-center units were subnormal at 4–8 days, becoming supernormal at 16 days and normal thereafter. ON–OFF- and ON-center units started to regain responsiveness at 16 days, and became supernormal at 42 days, before returning to normal. Conduction velocities of all fiber groups dropped to a minimum at 8 days, the fastest being affected most. There was a gradual recovery to normal conduction velocity by 63 days. The conduction latencies of OFF- and ON–OFF-center units recovered to normal by 42 days, and ON-center units by 63 days. Recovery of ganglion cell responsiveness correlates with functional recovery in the retinotectal system: OFF-center units recover light-evoked responses at about the time OFF activity first reappears in the tectum. ON- and ON–OFF-center units recover later, exhibiting supernormal spiking activity around the time that ON responses reappear in the tectum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document