Response of commissural and other upper cervical ventral horn neurons to vestibular stimuli in vertical planes

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Endo ◽  
J. Kasper ◽  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
B. J. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Ventral Horn ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Vestibulocollic Reflex ◽  
Commissural Neurons ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Neck Motoneurons ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Response Vector

1. To study their contribution to the vestibulocollic reflex, we have studied, in decerebrate paralyzed cats, the effect of sinusoidal vestibular stimulation in multiple vertical planes on the spontaneous activity of neurons in the C3 ventral horn. Antidromic microstimulation was used to identify 17/42 neurons as commissural; 10 of these were confirmed to have a projection to the contralateral ventral horn. 2. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with 0.05–1 Hz sinusoidal stimuli delivered near the plane of rotation that produced maximal modulation of neuron activity (response vector orientation). On the basis of their responses, we classified 38 neurons as receiving otolith, semicircular canal, or otolith + canal input. All three response types were found among commissure and nonantidromic neurons. 3. Two-thirds of neuron response vector orientations pointed contralaterally. They were either near the anterior or posterior canal planes or in the roll quadrant. In the case of neurons with input from canals, the latter indicates convergence from the vertical canals on the same side. There were almost no vectors in the pitch quadrants. The distribution of response vector orientations resembles that seen in the vestibular nuclei and pontomedullary reticular formation, suggesting that commissural neurons may not make a new contribution to spatial processing in the vertical vestibulocollic reflex. 4. It is presumed that commissural neurons are premotor. If so, some have the properties to be in the pathway between the contralateral utricle and neck motoneurons. More generally, their actions could modify the effectiveness of vestibulospinal and reticulospinal fibers that have similar spatial properties and make synapses with neck motoneurons.

Vestibulospinal effects on neurons in different regions of the gray matter of the cat upper cervical cord

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 2439-2446 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Isu ◽  
D. B. Thomson ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Gray Matter ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Afferent Input ◽  
Ventral Horn ◽  
Cervical Cord ◽  
Cuneate Nucleus ◽  
External Cuneate Nucleus ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Neck Motoneurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Previous studies of vestibular effects on the upper cervical cord have concentrated on the lateral and medial vestibulospinal tracts and on the actions that they exert on neck motoneurons and other neurons in the ventral horn. It is known, however, that both the rostral and the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei (VN) give rise to axons that are located in the dorsal and dorsolateral funiculi and that terminate in the dorsal horn. A primary goal of our experiments was to investigate the effect of VN stimulation on neurons dorsal to lamina VII. 2. In decerebrate cats with the caudal cerebellar vermis removed, we stimulated different areas of the VN with an array of electrode. The area of stimulation extended from the caudal tip of the descending nucleus to Deiters' nucleus, and was divided into rostral and caudal halves with the use of the descending nucleus as a reference. For control purposes some stimulating points were placed in the external cuneate nucleus and restiform body. 3. We tested the effects of VN stimulation on spontaneously firing neurons in the ipsilateral C2 and C3 segments. For purposes of classification the gray matter was divided into four zones corresponding approximately to laminae 1-IV, V-VI, VII, and VIII of Rexed. Overall, the activity of 39 of 84 neurons was influenced from one or more stimulating sites. For six cells there was some possibility of current spread to the external cuneate nucleus or to the underlying reticular formation. 4. VN-evoked effects could consist of facilitation, or, less often, inhibition. In the majority of facilitated neurons conditioning stimuli evoked a synchronized, short-latency, increase in firing probability. When evoked by single stimuli this facilitation was considered monosynaptic. Facilitation that was diffuse, or that was only evoked by two or more stimuli, presumably involved more complex pathways. The latency of inhibition could not be measured, but was short. 5. Stimulation of either the rostral or caudal VN had no effect on neurons in laminae I-IV. Electrodes placed rostrally had little effect on neurons in laminae V-VI, but influenced more than half the neurons in laminae VII-VIII. Conversely, electrodes placed caudally were most effective on cells in laminae V-VII, although they also influenced some neurons in lamina VIII. 6. Stimulation of the dorsal rami influenced most neurons in laminae V-VI, and about a quarter of the neurons in laminae VII-VIII. When tested, there was often convergence between vestibulospinal and peripheral inputs. 7. Our results provide physiological evidence that vestibulospinal fibers influence neurons not only in laminae VII and VIII, but also as far dorsally as lamina V. Fibers that influence neurons in laminae V and VI originate primarily in the caudal areas of the VN. As suggested previously on anatomic grounds, the projection to the dorsal laminae, which is predominantly facilitatory, often converges with afferent input and can therefore modulate its influence on spinal neurons.

Properties of sympathetic reflexes elicited by natural vestibular stimulation: implications for cardiovascular control

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2087-2092 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Yates ◽  
A. D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Splanchnic Nerve ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Sympathetic Reflexes ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Vestibulosympathetic Reflexes

1. To study the properties of vestibulosympathetic reflexes we recorded outflow from the splanchnic nerve during natural vestibular stimulation in multiple vertical planes in decerebrate cats. Most of the animals were cerebellectomized, although some responses were recorded in cerebellum-intact preparations. Vestibular stimulation was produced by rotating the head in animals whose upper cervical dorsal roots were transected to remove inputs from neck receptors; a baroreceptor denervation and vagotomy were also performed to remove visceral inputs. 2. The plane of head rotation that produced maximal modulation of splanchnic nerve activity (response vector orientation) was measured at 0.2–0.5 Hz. The dynamics of the response were then studied with sinusoidal (0.05- to 1-Hz) stimuli aligned with this orientation. 3. Typically, maximal modulation of splanchnic nerve outflow was elicited by head rotations in a plane near pitch; nose-up rotations produced increased outflow and nose-down rotations reduced nerve discharges. The gains of the responses remained relatively constant across stimulus frequencies and the phases were consistently near stimulus position, like regularly firing otolith afferents. Similar response dynamics were recorded in cerebellectomized and cerebellum-intact animals. 4. The splanchnic nerve responses to head rotation could be abolished by microinjections of the excitotoxin kainic acid into the medial and inferior vestibular nuclei, which is concordant with the responses resulting from activation of vestibular receptors. 5. The properties fo vestibulosympathetic reflexes recorded from the splanchnic nerve support the hypothesis that the vestibular system participates in compensating for posturally related changes in blood pressure.

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. I. Response to vestibular stimulation

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1753-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kasper ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Vertical Semicircular Canal ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Response Vector

1. We have studied, in decerebrate cats, the responses of neurons in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei to whole-body rotations in vertical planes that activated vertical semicircular canal and utricular receptors. Some neurons were identified as vestibulospinal by antidromic stimulation with floating electrodes placed in C4. 2. The direction of tilt that caused maximal excitation (response vector orientation) of each neuron was determined. Neuron dynamics were then studied with sinusoidal stimuli closely aligned with the response vector orientation, in the range 0.02-1 Hz. A few cells, for which we could not identify a response vector, probably had spatial-temporal convergence. 3. On the basis of dynamics, neurons were classified as receiving their input primarily from vertical semicircular canals, primarily from the otolith organs, or from canal+otolith convergence. 4. Response vector orientations of canal-driven neurons were often near +45 degrees or -45 degrees with respect to the transverse (roll) plane, suggesting these neurons received excitatory input from the ipsilateral anterior or posterior canal, respectively. Some neurons had canal-related dynamics but vector orientations near roll, presumably because they received convergent input from the ipsilateral anterior and posterior canals. Few neurons had their vectors near pitch. 5. In the lateral vestibular nucleus, neurons with otolith organ input (pure otolith or otolith+canal) tended to have vector orientations closer to roll than to pitch. In the descending nucleus the responses were evenly divided between the roll and pitch quadrants. 6. We conclude that most of our neurons have dynamics and response vector orientations that make them good candidates to participate in vestibulospinal reflexes acting on the limbs, but not those acting on the neck.

scholarly journals Adaptation of Orientation Vectors of Otolith-Related Central Vestibular Neurons to Gravity

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 1686-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia N. Eron ◽  
Bernard Cohen ◽  
Theodore Raphan ◽  
Sergei B. Yakushin
Keyword(s):  
Polarization Vector ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Perceptual Information ◽  
Behavioral Experiments ◽  
Adaptive Capabilities ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
First Time ◽  
Specific Orientation ◽  
Response Vector

Behavioral experiments indicate that central pathways that process otolith-ocular and perceptual information have adaptive capabilities. Because polarization vectors of otolith afferents are directly related to the electro-mechanical properties of the hair cell bundle, it is unlikely that they change their direction of excitation. This indicates that the adaptation must take place in central pathways. Here we demonstrate for the first time that otolith polarization vectors of canal-otolith convergent neurons in the vestibular nuclei have adaptive capability. A total of 10 vestibular-only and vestibular-plus-saccade neurons were recorded extracellularly in two monkeys before and after they were in side-down positions for 2 h. The spatial characteristics of the otolith input were determined from the response vector orientation (RVO), which is the projection of the otolith polarization vector, onto the head horizontal plane. The RVOs had no specific orientation before animals were in side-down positions but moved toward the gravitational axis after the animals were tilted for extended periods. Vector reorientations varied from 0 to 109° and were linearly related to the original deviation of the RVOs from gravity in the position of adaptation. Such reorientation of central polarization vectors could provide the basis for changes in perception and eye movements related to prolonged head tilts relative to gravity or in microgravity.

Responses of neurons of the cat central cervical nucleus to natural neck and vestibular stimulation

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 2786-2789 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Thomson ◽  
N. Isu ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Central Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Neck Rotation ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
To Receive

1. The central cervical nucleus (CCN) is known to receive neck and vestibular input and to project to the contralateral cerebellum and vestibular nuclei. To investigate the processing of neck and vestibular input by cells in the CCN, we studied their responses to sinusoidal neck rotation and to whole-body tilt in vertical planes in decerebrate, paralyzed cats. CCN neurons were identified by antidromic stimulation with electrodes placed in or near the contralateral restiform body. 2. For every neuron, we first identified the preferred direction of neck rotation (response vector orientation), then studied the neuron's dynamics with rotations in a plane close to this direction at 0.05-1 Hz. 3. Responses of CCN neurons to neck rotation resembled those of previously studied neck spindle primary afferents in terms of their dynamics and nonlinear responses to stimuli of differing amplitudes. They also resembled the neck responses of Deiters' neurons studied in similar preparations. 4. The activity of two-thirds of CCN neurons also was modulated by natural vestibular stimulation. Orientation and dynamics of vestibular responses were characterized in the same way as neck responses. Labyrinthine input originated predominantly from the contralateral vertical canals, and there was no evidence of otolith input. Neck and vestibular inputs were always antagonistic, but the gain of the vestibular response was lower than that of the neck response at all frequencies studied. 5. The quantitative aspects of the interaction between neck and vestibular inputs can be expected to vary with the type of preparation and with stimulus parameters, and its functional significance remains to be investigated.

Response of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons to vestibular stimuli in vertical planes. Role in vertical vestibulospinal reflexes of the decerebrate cat

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Bolton ◽  
T. Goto ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
Y. Yamagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Reticulospinal Neurons ◽  
Neuron Response ◽  
Vestibulospinal Reflexes ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Labyrinth Stimulation ◽  
Vestibulospinal Neurons ◽  
Response Vector

1. To investigate the neural substrate of vestibulospinal reflexes in decerebrate cats, we studied the responses of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons to natural stimulation of the labyrinth in vertical planes. Our principal aim was to determine whether reticulospinal neurons that terminate in, or are likely to give off collaterals to, the upper cervical segments had properties similar to those of the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR). 2. Antidromic stimulation was used to determine whether the neurons projected to the neck, lower cervical, thoracic, or lumbar levels. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with sinusoidal stimuli delivered at 0.05-1 Hz and aligned to the plane of body rotation, that produced maximal modulation of the neuron (response vector orientation). Each neuron was assigned a vestibular input classification of otolith, vertical canal, otolith + canal, or spatial-temporal convergence (STC). 3. We found, in agreement with previous studies, that the largest fraction of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons projected to the lumbar cord, and that only a small number ended in the neck segments. Neurons projecting to all levels of the spinal cord had similar responses to labyrinth stimulation. 4. Reticulospinal neurons that received only vertical canal inputs were rare (1 of 67 units). Most reticulospinal neurons (48%) received predominant otolith inputs, 18% received otolith + canal input, and only 9% had STC behavior. These data are in sharp contrast to the results of our previous studies of vestibulospinal neurons. A considerable portion of vestibulospinal neurons receives vertical canal input (38%), fewer receive predominantly otolith input (22%), whereas the proportion that have otolith + canal input or STC behavior is similar to our present reticulospinal data. 5. The response vector orientations of our reticulospinal neurons, particularly those with canal inputs (canal, otolith + canal, STC) were predominantly in the roll quadrants. There was no evidence of convergence of inputs from like canals across the midline (e.g., right anterior + left anterior). 6. Two characteristics of the VCR, STC behavior and bilateral input from symmetric vertical canals (in some muscles), cannot be accounted for by the reticulospinal neurons that we studied. Because these characteristics are also not seen in vestibulocollic neurons, they are likely to be the result of the appropriate convergence of vestibular signals in the spinal cord. 7. Pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons seem particularly well suited to play a role in gravity-dependent postural reflexes of neck and limbs.

scholarly journals Effects of caloric vestibular stimulation on serotoninergic system in the media vestibular nuclei of guinea pigs

2007 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-rong MA ◽  
Jun-xiu LIU ◽  
Xue-pei LI ◽  
Jian-jun MAO ◽  
Qun-dan ZHANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Serotoninergic System ◽  
Caloric Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
The Media

Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 2301-2316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Fitzpatrick ◽  
Brian L. Day
Keyword(s):  
Balance Control ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Human Balance ◽  
Cortical Inputs ◽  
Vestibular Organs

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a simple, safe, and specific way to elicit vestibular reflexes. Yet, despite a long history, it has only recently found popularity as a research tool and is rarely used clinically. The obstacle to advancing and exploiting GVS is that we cannot interpret the evoked responses with certainty because we do not understand how the stimulus acts as an input to the system. This paper examines the electrophysiology and anatomy of the vestibular organs and the effects of GVS on human balance control and develops a model that explains the observed balance responses. These responses are large and highly organized over all body segments and adapt to postural and balance requirements. To achieve this, neurons in the vestibular nuclei receive convergent signals from all vestibular receptors and somatosensory and cortical inputs. GVS sway responses are affected by other sources of information about balance but can appear as the sum of otolithic and semicircular canal responses. Electrophysiological studies showing similar activation of primary afferents from the otolith organs and canals and their convergence in the vestibular nuclei support this. On the basis of the morphology of the cristae and the alignment of the semicircular canals in the skull, rotational vectors calculated for every mode of GVS agree with the observed sway. However, vector summation of signals from all utricular afferents does not explain the observed sway. Thus we propose the hypothesis that the otolithic component of the balance response originates from only the pars medialis of the utricular macula.

Input patterns and pathways from the six semicircular canals to motoneurons of neck muscles. I. The multifidus muscle group

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 2691-2702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Shinoda ◽  
Y. Sugiuchi ◽  
T. Futami ◽  
N. Ando ◽  
T. Kawasaki
Keyword(s):  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Input Pattern ◽  
Muscle Group ◽  
Cervical Cord ◽  
Multifidus Muscle ◽  
Postsynaptic Potentials ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Neck Motoneurons ◽  
Homogeneous Pattern ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The pattern of connections between the six semicircular canals and neck motoneurons of the multifidus muscle group was investigated by recording intracellular potentials from motoneurons in the upper cervical cord of anesthetized cats. 2. Synaptic potentials were recorded in motoneurons of the rectus capitis posterior (RCP) muscle at C1, the obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) muscle at C1 and C2, and the cervical multifidus muscle (Multi) at C4 in response to electrical stimulation of individual ampullary nerves of the six semicircular canals. Excitatory or inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs or IPSPs, respectively) were evoked by separate stimulation of individual ampullary nerves in all of the neck motoneurons. Virtually all of the neck motoneurons received convergent inputs from the six ampullary nerves. 3. Motoneurons that supplied a single muscle had a homogeneous pattern of input from the six semicircular canals. There were two patterns of input from the six semicircular canals to motoneurons of the multifidus muscle group. RCP and Multi motoneurons were excited by stimulation of the bilateral anterior canal nerves (ACNs) and the contralateral lateral canal nerve (LCN) and inhibited by stimulation of the bilateral posterior canal nerves (PCNs) and the ipsilateral LCN. This input pattern is similar to that previously observed in other dorsal extensor muscles, whereas the other input pattern observed in OCI motoneurons is entirely new. OCI motoneurons at C1 and C2 were excited by stimulation of the ipsilateral ACN, PCN, and the contralateral LCN and inhibited by stimulation of the contralateral ACN, PCN, and the ipsilateral LCN. 4. Most postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) were disynaptic, but there were trisynaptic inhibitory connections between the contralateral ACN and PCN and OCI motoneurons, and between the contralateral PCN and RCP motoneurons. 5. The pathways for mediating these inputs from different semicircular canals to neck motoneurons were determined by making lesions in the lower medulla. Transection of the ipsilateral medial longitudinal fascicle (MLF) abolished the following potentials: all disynaptic PSPs in RCP motoneurons except the disynaptic EPSPs from the ipsilateral ACN, and in OCI motoneurons, disynaptic PSPs from the bilateral LCNs, and disynaptic IPSPs from the contralateral PCN. Complete bilateral section of the MLF did not affect the disynaptic EPSPs from the ipsilateral ACN in RCP motoneurons, the disynaptic EPSPs from the ipsilateral ACN and PCN in OCI motoneurons, nor the trisynaptic IPSPs from the contralateral ACN and PCN in COI motoneurons and from the contralateral PCN in RCP motoneurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document