Properties of sympathetic reflexes elicited by natural vestibular stimulation: implications for cardiovascular control

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2087-2092 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Yates ◽  
A. D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Splanchnic Nerve ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Sympathetic Reflexes ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Vestibulosympathetic Reflexes

1. To study the properties of vestibulosympathetic reflexes we recorded outflow from the splanchnic nerve during natural vestibular stimulation in multiple vertical planes in decerebrate cats. Most of the animals were cerebellectomized, although some responses were recorded in cerebellum-intact preparations. Vestibular stimulation was produced by rotating the head in animals whose upper cervical dorsal roots were transected to remove inputs from neck receptors; a baroreceptor denervation and vagotomy were also performed to remove visceral inputs. 2. The plane of head rotation that produced maximal modulation of splanchnic nerve activity (response vector orientation) was measured at 0.2–0.5 Hz. The dynamics of the response were then studied with sinusoidal (0.05- to 1-Hz) stimuli aligned with this orientation. 3. Typically, maximal modulation of splanchnic nerve outflow was elicited by head rotations in a plane near pitch; nose-up rotations produced increased outflow and nose-down rotations reduced nerve discharges. The gains of the responses remained relatively constant across stimulus frequencies and the phases were consistently near stimulus position, like regularly firing otolith afferents. Similar response dynamics were recorded in cerebellectomized and cerebellum-intact animals. 4. The splanchnic nerve responses to head rotation could be abolished by microinjections of the excitotoxin kainic acid into the medial and inferior vestibular nuclei, which is concordant with the responses resulting from activation of vestibular receptors. 5. The properties fo vestibulosympathetic reflexes recorded from the splanchnic nerve support the hypothesis that the vestibular system participates in compensating for posturally related changes in blood pressure.

Convergent Properties of Vestibular-Related Brain Stem Neurons in the Gerbil

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 1958-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galen D. Kaufman ◽  
Michael E. Shinder ◽  
Adrian A. Perachio
Keyword(s):  
Translational Motion ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Inhibitory Input ◽  
Type I ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Related Activity

Three classes of vestibular-related neurons were found in and near the prepositus and medial vestibular nuclei of alert or decerebrate gerbils, those responding to: horizontal translational motion, horizontal head rotation, or both. Their distribution ratios were 1:2:2, respectively. Many cells responsive to translational motion exhibited spatiotemporal characteristics with both response gain and phase varying as a function of the stimulus vector angle. Rotationally sensitive neurons were distributed as Type I, II, or III responses (sensitive to ipsilateral, contralateral, or both directions, respectively) in the ratios of 4:6:1. Four tested factors shaped the response dynamics of the sampled neurons: canal-otolith convergence, oculomotor-related activity, rotational Type (I or II), and the phase of the maximum response. Type I nonconvergent cells displayed increasing gains with increasing rotational stimulus frequency (0.1–2.0 Hz, 60°/s), whereas Type II neurons with convergent inputs had response gains that markedly decreased with increasing translational stimulus frequency (0.25–2.0 Hz, ±0.1 g). Type I convergent and Type II nonconvergent neurons exhibited essentially flat gains across the stimulus frequency range. Oculomotor-related activity was noted in 30% of the cells across all functional types, appearing as burst/pause discharge patterns related to the fast phase of nystagmus during head rotation. Oculomotor-related activity was correlated with enhanced dynamic range compared with the same category that had no oculomotor-related response. Finally, responses that were in-phase with head velocity during rotation exhibited greater gains with stimulus frequency increments than neurons with out-of-phase responses. In contrast, for translational motion, neurons out of phase with head acceleration exhibited low-pass characteristics, whereas in-phase neurons did not. Data from decerebrate preparations revealed that although similar response types could be detected, the sampled cells generally had lower background discharge rates, on average one-third lower response gains, and convergent properties that differed from those found in the alert animals. On the basis of the dynamic response of identified cell types, we propose a pair of models in which inhibitory input from vestibular-related neurons converges on oculomotor neurons with excitatory inputs from the vestibular nuclei. Simple signal convergence and combinations of different types of vestibular labyrinth information can enrich the dynamic characteristics of the rotational and translational vestibuloocular responses.

Response of commissural and other upper cervical ventral horn neurons to vestibular stimuli in vertical planes

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Endo ◽  
J. Kasper ◽  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
B. J. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Ventral Horn ◽  
Neuron Activity ◽  
Vestibulocollic Reflex ◽  
Commissural Neurons ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Neck Motoneurons ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Response Vector

1. To study their contribution to the vestibulocollic reflex, we have studied, in decerebrate paralyzed cats, the effect of sinusoidal vestibular stimulation in multiple vertical planes on the spontaneous activity of neurons in the C3 ventral horn. Antidromic microstimulation was used to identify 17/42 neurons as commissural; 10 of these were confirmed to have a projection to the contralateral ventral horn. 2. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with 0.05–1 Hz sinusoidal stimuli delivered near the plane of rotation that produced maximal modulation of neuron activity (response vector orientation). On the basis of their responses, we classified 38 neurons as receiving otolith, semicircular canal, or otolith + canal input. All three response types were found among commissure and nonantidromic neurons. 3. Two-thirds of neuron response vector orientations pointed contralaterally. They were either near the anterior or posterior canal planes or in the roll quadrant. In the case of neurons with input from canals, the latter indicates convergence from the vertical canals on the same side. There were almost no vectors in the pitch quadrants. The distribution of response vector orientations resembles that seen in the vestibular nuclei and pontomedullary reticular formation, suggesting that commissural neurons may not make a new contribution to spatial processing in the vertical vestibulocollic reflex. 4. It is presumed that commissural neurons are premotor. If so, some have the properties to be in the pathway between the contralateral utricle and neck motoneurons. More generally, their actions could modify the effectiveness of vestibulospinal and reticulospinal fibers that have similar spatial properties and make synapses with neck motoneurons.

Tilt responses of neurons in the caudal descending nucleus of the decerebrate cat: influence of the caudal cerebellar vermis and of neck receptors

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 1242-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
H. Ikegami ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
D. B. Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Muscle Spindles ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Cerebellar Vermis ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Neck Rotation ◽  
Vertical Semicircular Canal

1. In decerebrate cats with intact cerebellums, we studied the responses of neurons in the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei to natural vestibular stimulation in vertical planes and to neck rotation. The activity of most neurons was recorded in the caudal half of the descending nucleus. 2. One goal of our experiments was to compare the dynamic and spatial properties of responses to sinusoidal vestibular stimulation with those seen in previous experiments in which the caudal cerebellar vermis, including the nodulus and uvula, was removed. This part of the cerebellum receives vestibular input and projects to the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei, suggesting that it could influence responses to stimulation of the labyrinth. 3. As in our previous experiments, most neurons could be classified as receiving predominant input either from the otoliths or from one vertical semicircular canal. When mean gain and phase and response vector orientations were compared, there were no obvious differences between the behavior of neurons in the partially decerebellate preparation and the one with the cerebellum intact, demonstrating that in the decerebrate cat the nodulus and uvula have little or no influence on the processing of vertical vestibular input in this region of the vestibular nuclei. 4. Only 23 of 74 (31%) of neurons tested responded to neck rotation. This contrasts with the much larger fractions that respond to this stimulus in Deiters' nucleus and in the rostral descending nucleus. We also recorded from neurons near the vestibular nuclei, mainly in the external cuneate nucleus. All of them (9 of 9) responded to neck rotation. 5. Responses to neck rotation also differed in their dynamics from those found more rostrally in the vestibular nuclei. Dynamics of more rostral neurons resemble those of neck muscle spindles, as do those of external cuneate neurons. The dynamics of caudal vestibular neurons, on the other hand, have a steeper gain slope and more advanced phases than do those of neurons in the more rostral vestibular nuclei. This suggests the possibility of involvement of additional receptors in the production of these responses. 6. In the more rostral vestibular nuclei, responses to vestibular and neck rotation are most often antagonistic, so that head rotation results in little or no response. This is not the case in the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei, where less than half the neurons tested displayed antagonistic behavior. Further experiments are required to put the neck projection to the caudal vestibular nuclei in a functional context.

Responses of neurons of the cat central cervical nucleus to natural neck and vestibular stimulation

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 2786-2789 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. Thomson ◽  
N. Isu ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Central Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Neck Rotation ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
To Receive

1. The central cervical nucleus (CCN) is known to receive neck and vestibular input and to project to the contralateral cerebellum and vestibular nuclei. To investigate the processing of neck and vestibular input by cells in the CCN, we studied their responses to sinusoidal neck rotation and to whole-body tilt in vertical planes in decerebrate, paralyzed cats. CCN neurons were identified by antidromic stimulation with electrodes placed in or near the contralateral restiform body. 2. For every neuron, we first identified the preferred direction of neck rotation (response vector orientation), then studied the neuron's dynamics with rotations in a plane close to this direction at 0.05-1 Hz. 3. Responses of CCN neurons to neck rotation resembled those of previously studied neck spindle primary afferents in terms of their dynamics and nonlinear responses to stimuli of differing amplitudes. They also resembled the neck responses of Deiters' neurons studied in similar preparations. 4. The activity of two-thirds of CCN neurons also was modulated by natural vestibular stimulation. Orientation and dynamics of vestibular responses were characterized in the same way as neck responses. Labyrinthine input originated predominantly from the contralateral vertical canals, and there was no evidence of otolith input. Neck and vestibular inputs were always antagonistic, but the gain of the vestibular response was lower than that of the neck response at all frequencies studied. 5. The quantitative aspects of the interaction between neck and vestibular inputs can be expected to vary with the type of preparation and with stimulus parameters, and its functional significance remains to be investigated.

Vestibular Convergence Patterns in Vestibular Nuclei Neurons of Alert Primates

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 3518-3533 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Dickman ◽  
Dora E. Angelaki
Keyword(s):  
Body Movement ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Maximum Sensitivity ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Response Dynamics ◽  
Central Neurons

Sensory signal convergence is a fundamental and important aspect of brain function. Such convergence may often involve complex multidimensional interactions as those proposed for the processing of otolith and semicircular canal (SCC) information for the detection of translational head movements and the effective discrimination from physically congruent gravity signals. In the present study, we have examined the responses of primate rostral vestibular nuclei (VN) neurons that do not exhibit any eye movement-related activity using 0.5-Hz translational and three-dimensional (3D) rotational motion. Three distinct neural populations were identified. Approximately one-fourth of the cells exclusively encoded rotational movements (canal-only neurons) and were unresponsive to translation. The canal-only central neurons encoded head rotation in SCC coordinates, exhibited little orthogonal canal convergence, and were characterized with significantly higher sensitivities to rotation as compared to primary SCC afferents. Another fourth of the neurons modulated their firing rates during translation (otolith-only cells). During rotations, these neurons only responded when the axis of rotation was earth-horizontal and the head was changing orientation relative to gravity. The remaining one-half of VN neurons were sensitive to both rotations and translations (otolith + canal neurons). Unlike primary otolith afferents, however, central neurons often exhibited significant spatiotemporal (noncosine) tuning properties and a wide variety of response dynamics to translation. To characterize the pattern of SCC inputs to otolith + canal neurons, their rotational maximum sensitivity vectors were computed using exclusively responses during earth-vertical axis rotations (EVA). Maximum sensitivity vectors were distributed throughout the 3D space, suggesting strong convergence from multiple SCCs. These neurons were also tested with earth-horizontal axis rotations (EHA), which would activate both vertical canals and otolith organs. However, the recorded responses could not be predicted from a linear combination of EVA rotational and translational responses. In contrast, one-third of the neurons responded similarly during EVA and EHA rotations, although a significant response modulation was present during translation. Thus this subpopulation of otolith + canal cells, which included neurons with either high- or low-pass dynamics to translation, appear to selectively ignore the component of otolith-selective activation that is due to changes in the orientation of the head relative to gravity. Thus contrary to primary otolith afferents and otolith-only central neurons that respond equivalently to tilts relative to gravity and translational movements, approximately one-third of the otolith + canal cells seem to encode a true estimate of the translational component of the imposed passive head and body movement.

Changes in outflow to respiratory pump muscles produced by natural vestibular stimulation

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 3274-3284 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Rossiter ◽  
N. L. Hayden ◽  
S. D. Stocker ◽  
B. J. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Phrenic Nerve ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Vagus Nerves ◽  
Stimulus Position ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Static Head ◽  
Head Rotations

1. Activity was recorded from abdominal (expiratory) and phrenic (inspiratory) nerves during natural vestibular stimulation in multiple vertical planes and the horizontal plane in decerebrate cats. Vestibular stimulation was produced by rotating the head in animals whose upper cervical dorsal roots were transected to remove inputs from neck receptors; the upper airway and carotid sinus were denervated, and the vagus nerves were transected to assure that the head rotations did not elicit visceral or pulmonary inputs. 2. The plane of head rotation that produced maximal modulation of respiratory nerve activity (response vector orientation) was measured at one or more frequencies between 0.05 and 0.5 Hz. The dynamics of the response were then studied with sinusoidal (0.05–2 Hz) stimuli aligned with this orientation. In some animals, sinusoidal horizontal rotations of the head at 0.5 and 1 Hz or static head tilts in the pitch and roll planes were also delivered. 3. Typically, maximal modulation of abdominal nerve outflow was elicited by head rotations in a plane near pitch; nose-up rotations produced increased outflow, and nose-down rotations reduced nerve discharges. The gains of the responses (relative to stimulus position) remained relatively constant across stimulus frequencies, and the phases were consistently near stimulus position, like regularly firing otolith afferents. Static nose-up tilt produced elevated abdominal nerve activity throughout the stimulus period, providing further evidence that pitch-sensitive otolith receptors contribute to the response. Horizontal head rotations had little influence on abdominal nerve discharges. 4. The abdominal nerve responses to head rotation were abolished by chemical or aspiration lesions of the medial and inferior vestibular nuclei, which is concordant with the responses resulting from activation of vestibular receptors. Transections of axons arising from bulbospinal neurons in the ventral respiratory group, which are known to be the predominant source of expiratory signals to the spinal cord, reduced but did not abolish the vestibuloabdominal reflex. Thus it is likely that nonrespiratory neurons also participate in generating this response. 5. Nose-up pitch of the head; and in particular large (50 degrees) static tilts, produced small increases in phrenic nerve activity. Ear-down tilt and horizontal rotation of the head produced no responses in the phrenic nerve. 6. The existence of vestibular inputs to some respiratory motoneurons suggests that the vestibular system has influences on muscles in addition to those typically considered to have antigravity roles, and participates globally in adjusting muscle activity during movement and changes in posturex.

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. I. Response to vestibular stimulation

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1753-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kasper ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Vertical Semicircular Canal ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Response Vector

1. We have studied, in decerebrate cats, the responses of neurons in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei to whole-body rotations in vertical planes that activated vertical semicircular canal and utricular receptors. Some neurons were identified as vestibulospinal by antidromic stimulation with floating electrodes placed in C4. 2. The direction of tilt that caused maximal excitation (response vector orientation) of each neuron was determined. Neuron dynamics were then studied with sinusoidal stimuli closely aligned with the response vector orientation, in the range 0.02-1 Hz. A few cells, for which we could not identify a response vector, probably had spatial-temporal convergence. 3. On the basis of dynamics, neurons were classified as receiving their input primarily from vertical semicircular canals, primarily from the otolith organs, or from canal+otolith convergence. 4. Response vector orientations of canal-driven neurons were often near +45 degrees or -45 degrees with respect to the transverse (roll) plane, suggesting these neurons received excitatory input from the ipsilateral anterior or posterior canal, respectively. Some neurons had canal-related dynamics but vector orientations near roll, presumably because they received convergent input from the ipsilateral anterior and posterior canals. Few neurons had their vectors near pitch. 5. In the lateral vestibular nucleus, neurons with otolith organ input (pure otolith or otolith+canal) tended to have vector orientations closer to roll than to pitch. In the descending nucleus the responses were evenly divided between the roll and pitch quadrants. 6. We conclude that most of our neurons have dynamics and response vector orientations that make them good candidates to participate in vestibulospinal reflexes acting on the limbs, but not those acting on the neck.

scholarly journals Effects of caloric vestibular stimulation on serotoninergic system in the media vestibular nuclei of guinea pigs

2007 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-rong MA ◽  
Jun-xiu LIU ◽  
Xue-pei LI ◽  
Jian-jun MAO ◽  
Qun-dan ZHANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Serotoninergic System ◽  
Caloric Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
The Media

Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 2301-2316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Fitzpatrick ◽  
Brian L. Day
Keyword(s):  
Balance Control ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Human Balance ◽  
Cortical Inputs ◽  
Vestibular Organs

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a simple, safe, and specific way to elicit vestibular reflexes. Yet, despite a long history, it has only recently found popularity as a research tool and is rarely used clinically. The obstacle to advancing and exploiting GVS is that we cannot interpret the evoked responses with certainty because we do not understand how the stimulus acts as an input to the system. This paper examines the electrophysiology and anatomy of the vestibular organs and the effects of GVS on human balance control and develops a model that explains the observed balance responses. These responses are large and highly organized over all body segments and adapt to postural and balance requirements. To achieve this, neurons in the vestibular nuclei receive convergent signals from all vestibular receptors and somatosensory and cortical inputs. GVS sway responses are affected by other sources of information about balance but can appear as the sum of otolithic and semicircular canal responses. Electrophysiological studies showing similar activation of primary afferents from the otolith organs and canals and their convergence in the vestibular nuclei support this. On the basis of the morphology of the cristae and the alignment of the semicircular canals in the skull, rotational vectors calculated for every mode of GVS agree with the observed sway. However, vector summation of signals from all utricular afferents does not explain the observed sway. Thus we propose the hypothesis that the otolithic component of the balance response originates from only the pars medialis of the utricular macula.

Anatomic patterning in the expression of vestibulosympathetic reflexes

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (1) ◽  
pp. R109-R117 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Kerman ◽  
B. J. Yates ◽  
R. M. McAllen
Keyword(s):  
Relative Proportion ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Nerve Fibers ◽  
Spike Shape ◽  
The Face ◽  
Nerve Fascicle ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Vestibulosympathetic Reflexes

To investigate the possibility that expression of vestibulosympathetic reflexes (VSR) is related to a nerve's anatomic location rather than its target organ, we compared VSR recorded from the same type of postganglionic fiber [muscle vasoconstrictor (MVC)] located at three different rostrocaudal levels: hindlimb, forelimb, and face. Experiments were performed on chloralose-anesthetized cats, and vestibular afferents were stimulated electrically. Single MVC unit activity was extracted by spike shape analysis of few-fiber recordings, and unit discrimination was confirmed by autocorrelation. Poststimulus time histogram analysis revealed that about half of the neurons were initially inhibited by vestibular stimulation (type 1 response), whereas the other MVC fibers were initially strongly excited (type 2 response). MVC units with types 1 and 2 responses were present in the same nerve fascicle. Barosensitivity was equivalent in the two groups, but fibers showing type 1 responses fired significantly faster than those giving type 2 responses (0.29 ± 0.04 vs. 0.20 ± 0.02 Hz). Nerve fibers with type 1 responses were most common in the hindlimb (21 of 29 units) and least common in the face (2 of 11 units), the difference in relative proportion being significant ( P < 0.05, χ2 test). These results support the hypothesis that VSR are anatomically patterned.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document