Vertical vestibular input to and projections from the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei of the decerebrate cat

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Endo ◽  
D. B. Thomson ◽  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
T. Yamaguchi ◽  
B. J. Yates
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Central Processing ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Vestibulospinal Neurons ◽  
Response Vector ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. To investigate the type of vestibular signals that neurons in the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei transmit to the cerebellum and spinal cord, we studied their responses to natural vestibular stimulation in vertical planes in decerebrate cats with the caudal cerebellum removed. Most neurons were in the caudal half of the descending vestibular nucleus, the remainder at corresponding levels of the medial nucleus or the medial-descending border. 2. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with sinusoidal tilts delivered at 0.05-1 Hz near the plane of body rotation that produced maximal modulation of the neuron's activity (response vector orientation). For most neurons the predominant vestibular input could be identified as coming from otolith organs (46%) or vertical semicircular canals (37%). Some neurons had otolith+canal convergence (9%) and others either had such converging input or some other form of central processing (8%). 3. Gain and phase of the responses of otolith neurons were comparable with values obtained in earlier studies on Deiters' nucleus and the rostral descending nucleus. Many canal neurons had a steeper gain slope and more advanced phase than observed previously for more rostral neurons. This may be due to more irregular afferent input to many neurons or to the absence of the vestibulocerebellum. 4. Response vector orientations of canal neurons were closely bunched near the planes of the ipsilateral vertical canals. The small number of contralaterally projecting vectors showed evidence of convergence between the two contralateral vertical canals. As is the case elsewhere in the vestibular nuclei, there was no evidence of convergence from bilateral vertical canals. Response vector orientations of otolith neurons were restricted to the roll quadrants; the majority pointed ipsilaterally. 5. Antidromic stimulation with an electrode in the restiform body or with several electrodes in the dorsal half of the white matter of the upper cervical cord was used to identify neurons projecting to the cerebellum and spinal cord, respectively. A substantial number of spontaneously firing neurons projected to the cerebellum, but there were few spontaneously active vestibulospinal neurons. The properties of the vestibular input to cerebellar-projecting neurons were the same as those of the population as a whole, but the effect of tilt on vestibulospinal neurons appeared weak or absent. 6. Many neurons were inhibited by stimulation of the restiform body. We suggest that this is mainly due to stimulation of the axons of vestibulocerebellar Purkinje cells. 7. Our results demonstrate a robust vertical vestibular input to the caudal parts of the vestibular nuclei.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Response of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons to vestibular stimuli in vertical planes. Role in vertical vestibulospinal reflexes of the decerebrate cat

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Bolton ◽  
T. Goto ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
Y. Yamagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Reticulospinal Neurons ◽  
Neuron Response ◽  
Vestibulospinal Reflexes ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Labyrinth Stimulation ◽  
Vestibulospinal Neurons ◽  
Response Vector

1. To investigate the neural substrate of vestibulospinal reflexes in decerebrate cats, we studied the responses of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons to natural stimulation of the labyrinth in vertical planes. Our principal aim was to determine whether reticulospinal neurons that terminate in, or are likely to give off collaterals to, the upper cervical segments had properties similar to those of the vestibulocollic reflex (VCR). 2. Antidromic stimulation was used to determine whether the neurons projected to the neck, lower cervical, thoracic, or lumbar levels. Dynamics of the responses of spontaneously firing neurons were studied with sinusoidal stimuli delivered at 0.05-1 Hz and aligned to the plane of body rotation, that produced maximal modulation of the neuron (response vector orientation). Each neuron was assigned a vestibular input classification of otolith, vertical canal, otolith + canal, or spatial-temporal convergence (STC). 3. We found, in agreement with previous studies, that the largest fraction of pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons projected to the lumbar cord, and that only a small number ended in the neck segments. Neurons projecting to all levels of the spinal cord had similar responses to labyrinth stimulation. 4. Reticulospinal neurons that received only vertical canal inputs were rare (1 of 67 units). Most reticulospinal neurons (48%) received predominant otolith inputs, 18% received otolith + canal input, and only 9% had STC behavior. These data are in sharp contrast to the results of our previous studies of vestibulospinal neurons. A considerable portion of vestibulospinal neurons receives vertical canal input (38%), fewer receive predominantly otolith input (22%), whereas the proportion that have otolith + canal input or STC behavior is similar to our present reticulospinal data. 5. The response vector orientations of our reticulospinal neurons, particularly those with canal inputs (canal, otolith + canal, STC) were predominantly in the roll quadrants. There was no evidence of convergence of inputs from like canals across the midline (e.g., right anterior + left anterior). 6. Two characteristics of the VCR, STC behavior and bilateral input from symmetric vertical canals (in some muscles), cannot be accounted for by the reticulospinal neurons that we studied. Because these characteristics are also not seen in vestibulocollic neurons, they are likely to be the result of the appropriate convergence of vestibular signals in the spinal cord. 7. Pontomedullary reticulospinal neurons seem particularly well suited to play a role in gravity-dependent postural reflexes of neck and limbs.

Tilt responses of neurons in the caudal descending nucleus of the decerebrate cat: influence of the caudal cerebellar vermis and of neck receptors

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 1242-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. J. Wilson ◽  
H. Ikegami ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
D. B. Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Head Rotation ◽  
Muscle Spindles ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Cerebellar Vermis ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Neck Rotation ◽  
Vertical Semicircular Canal

1. In decerebrate cats with intact cerebellums, we studied the responses of neurons in the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei to natural vestibular stimulation in vertical planes and to neck rotation. The activity of most neurons was recorded in the caudal half of the descending nucleus. 2. One goal of our experiments was to compare the dynamic and spatial properties of responses to sinusoidal vestibular stimulation with those seen in previous experiments in which the caudal cerebellar vermis, including the nodulus and uvula, was removed. This part of the cerebellum receives vestibular input and projects to the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei, suggesting that it could influence responses to stimulation of the labyrinth. 3. As in our previous experiments, most neurons could be classified as receiving predominant input either from the otoliths or from one vertical semicircular canal. When mean gain and phase and response vector orientations were compared, there were no obvious differences between the behavior of neurons in the partially decerebellate preparation and the one with the cerebellum intact, demonstrating that in the decerebrate cat the nodulus and uvula have little or no influence on the processing of vertical vestibular input in this region of the vestibular nuclei. 4. Only 23 of 74 (31%) of neurons tested responded to neck rotation. This contrasts with the much larger fractions that respond to this stimulus in Deiters' nucleus and in the rostral descending nucleus. We also recorded from neurons near the vestibular nuclei, mainly in the external cuneate nucleus. All of them (9 of 9) responded to neck rotation. 5. Responses to neck rotation also differed in their dynamics from those found more rostrally in the vestibular nuclei. Dynamics of more rostral neurons resemble those of neck muscle spindles, as do those of external cuneate neurons. The dynamics of caudal vestibular neurons, on the other hand, have a steeper gain slope and more advanced phases than do those of neurons in the more rostral vestibular nuclei. This suggests the possibility of involvement of additional receptors in the production of these responses. 6. In the more rostral vestibular nuclei, responses to vestibular and neck rotation are most often antagonistic, so that head rotation results in little or no response. This is not the case in the caudal areas of the vestibular nuclei, where less than half the neurons tested displayed antagonistic behavior. Further experiments are required to put the neck projection to the caudal vestibular nuclei in a functional context.

Organization of vestibular inputs to nucleus tractus solitarius and adjacent structures in cat brain stem

1994 ◽  
Vol 267 (4) ◽  
pp. R974-R983 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Yates ◽  
L. Grelot ◽  
I. A. Kerman ◽  
C. D. Balaban ◽  
J. Jakus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Sickness ◽  
Nucleus Tractus Solitarius ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Input ◽  
Dorsal Respiratory Group ◽  
Adjacent Structures ◽  
Cat Brain ◽  
Phaseolus Vulgaris Leucoagglutinin ◽  
Vestibulosympathetic Reflexes ◽  
Stimulation Of

The vestibular system is involved in maintaining stable blood pressure and respiration during changes in posture and is essential for eliciting motion sickness-related vomiting. Because the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) participates in the regulation of sympathetic and inspiratory outflow and the triggering of emesis, we tested the hypothesis that this region receives vestibular inputs in cats. In one set of experiments, microinjections of the tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin into the medial and inferior vestibular nuclei labeled projections to the middle and lateral regions of the NTS. In electrophysiological experiments, electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve modified the firing rates of neurons located in the same regions. Some neurons with vestibular inputs received convergent signals from the abdominal vagus nerve and could potentially mediate motion sickness-related vomiting. Others received convergent baroreceptor inputs and could act as a substrate for some components of vestibulosympathetic reflexes. In contrast, inspiratory neurons in the dorsal respiratory group received little vestibular input, suggesting that vestibulorespiratory reflexes are mediated by cells located elsewhere.

Response of vestibular neurons to head rotations in vertical planes. I. Response to vestibular stimulation

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1753-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kasper ◽  
R. H. Schor ◽  
V. J. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Vertical Semicircular Canal ◽  
Vector Orientation ◽  
Response Vector

1. We have studied, in decerebrate cats, the responses of neurons in the lateral and descending vestibular nuclei to whole-body rotations in vertical planes that activated vertical semicircular canal and utricular receptors. Some neurons were identified as vestibulospinal by antidromic stimulation with floating electrodes placed in C4. 2. The direction of tilt that caused maximal excitation (response vector orientation) of each neuron was determined. Neuron dynamics were then studied with sinusoidal stimuli closely aligned with the response vector orientation, in the range 0.02-1 Hz. A few cells, for which we could not identify a response vector, probably had spatial-temporal convergence. 3. On the basis of dynamics, neurons were classified as receiving their input primarily from vertical semicircular canals, primarily from the otolith organs, or from canal+otolith convergence. 4. Response vector orientations of canal-driven neurons were often near +45 degrees or -45 degrees with respect to the transverse (roll) plane, suggesting these neurons received excitatory input from the ipsilateral anterior or posterior canal, respectively. Some neurons had canal-related dynamics but vector orientations near roll, presumably because they received convergent input from the ipsilateral anterior and posterior canals. Few neurons had their vectors near pitch. 5. In the lateral vestibular nucleus, neurons with otolith organ input (pure otolith or otolith+canal) tended to have vector orientations closer to roll than to pitch. In the descending nucleus the responses were evenly divided between the roll and pitch quadrants. 6. We conclude that most of our neurons have dynamics and response vector orientations that make them good candidates to participate in vestibulospinal reflexes acting on the limbs, but not those acting on the neck.

Responses of lateral reticular neurons to sinusoidal stimulation of labyrinth receptors in decerebrate cat

1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 922-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Kubin ◽  
P. C. Magherini ◽  
D. Manzoni ◽  
O. Pompeiano
Keyword(s):  
Firing Rate ◽  
Longitudinal Axis ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Peak Amplitude ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Slow Rotation ◽  
Medullary Reticular Formation ◽  
Decerebrate Cat ◽  
Reticular Neurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The electrical activity of 106 individual neurons located in the precerebellar lateral reticular nucleus (NRL) and the surrounding medullary reticular formation (RF) has been recorded in precollicular decerebrate cats during sinusoidal tilt around the longitudinal axis of the whole animal leading to stimulation of labyrinth receptors. 2. Among these lateral reticular neurons tested, 48 of 712 (67.6%) NRL neurons and 11 of 35 (31.4%) RF neurons responded to slow rotation of the animal at the standard frequency of 0.026 Hz and at the peak amplitude of displacement of 5-10 degrees. 3. All the responsive units showed a periodic modulation of firing rate during the sinusoidal stimulus. In particular, 35 of 57 units (i.e., 61.4%) were excited during side-up and depressed during side-down tilt of the whole animal; on the other hand, 14 of 57 units (i.e., 24.6%) showed the opposite behavior. In both instances, the peak of the responses occurred with an average phase lead of about 16 degrees with respect to the extreme side-up or side-down position of the animal. The remaining eight units (i.e., 14%) showed a phase shift of the peak of their response of about 90 degrees with respect to the animal position. 4. The sensitivity of the responses, expressed in percentage change of the average firing rate per degree of displacement, did not change by increasing the peak amplitude of tilt from 5 to 15 degrees at the frequency of 0.026 Hz. This finding indicates that the system was relatively linear with respect to the amplitude of stimulation. The sensitivity of the units, however, slightly increased but the phase angle of the responses did not change by increasing the frequency of tilting from 0.015 to 0.15 Hz at the peak amplitude of 5 or 10 degrees. These findings indicate that the responses depended on stimulation of macular labyrinth receptors. 5. Most of the lateral reticular units affected by tilt received also a bilateral convergent input from the hindlimbs. 6. These observations are related to the results of previous studies in which the responses of macular afferents, vestibular nuclei neurons, and corticocerebellar Purkinje (P) cells to sinusoidal tilt of the whole animal have been investigated. A possible role of lateral reticular neurons in the labyrinth control of posture in decerebrate cat is also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document