Nash Equilibria in Large Games
Keyword(s):
This paper adds to the discussion, in a general setting, that given a Nash-Schmeidler (nonanonymous) game it is not always possible to define a Mas-Colell (anonymous) game. In the two games, the players have different strategic behaviours and the formulations of the two problems are different. Also, we offer a novel explanation for the lack of a Nash equilibrium in an infinite game. We consider this game as the limit of a sequence of approximate, finite games for which an equilibrium exists. However, the limiting pure strategy function is not measurable.
2015 ◽
Vol 45
(3)
◽
pp. 685-697
◽
2021 ◽
Vol 4
(2)
◽
pp. 178-199
Keyword(s):
2019 ◽
Vol 33
◽
pp. 2173-2180
◽
Keyword(s):
2006 ◽
Vol 65
(1)
◽
pp. 141-152
◽
2014 ◽
Vol 2014
◽
pp. 1-8
◽