scholarly journals Chewing Prevents Stress-Induced Hippocampal LTD Formation and Anxiety-Related Behaviors: A Possible Role of the Dopaminergic System

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumie Ono ◽  
So Koizumi ◽  
Minoru Onozuka
Keyword(s):  
Dopaminergic System ◽  
Ventral Hippocampus ◽  
Male Rats ◽  
Ca1 Region ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1 Region ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1 ◽  
Plus Maze ◽  
And Control

The present study examined the effects of chewing on stress-induced long-term depression (LTD) and anxiogenic behavior. Experiments were performed in adult male rats under three conditions: restraint stress condition, voluntary chewing condition during stress, and control condition without any treatments except handling. Chewing ameliorated LTD development in the hippocampal CA1 region. It also counteracted the stress-suppressed number of entries to the center region of the open field when they were tested immediately, 30 min, or 60 min after restraint. At the latter two poststress time periods, chewing during restraint significantly increased the number of times of open arm entries in the elevated plus maze, when compared with those without chewing. Thein vivomicrodialysis further revealed that extracellular dopamine concentration in the ventral hippocampus, which is involved in anxiety-related behavior, was significantly greater in chewing rats than in those without chewing from 30 to 105 min after stress exposure. Development of LTD and anxiolytic effects ameliorated by chewing were counteracted by administering the D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390, which suggested that chewing may activate the dopaminergic system in the ventral hippocampus to suppress stress-induced anxiogenic behavior.

[Gly14]-humanin rescues long-term potentiation from amyloid β protein-induced impairment in the rat hippocampal CA1 region in vivo

Synapse ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Guo ◽  
Wei Jing ◽  
Cun-Gen Ma ◽  
Mei-Na Wu ◽  
Jun-Fang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amyloid Β ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Amyloid Β Protein ◽  
Ca1 Region ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1 Region ◽  
Β Protein ◽  
Term Potentiation ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1

Noradrenergic Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampal CA1 Region

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 3013-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Katsuki ◽  
Yukitoshi Izumi ◽  
Charles F. Zorumski
Keyword(s):  
Synaptic Plasticity ◽  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Hippocampal Slices ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Ca1 Region ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1 Region ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1

Katsuki, Hiroshi, Yukitoshi Izumi, and Charles F. Zorumski. Noradrenergic regulation of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1 region. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 3013–3020, 1997. The effects of norepinephrine (NE) and related agents on long-lasting changes in synaptic efficacy induced by several patterns of afferent stimuli were investigated in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. NE (10 μM) showed little effect on the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) triggered by theta-burst-patterned stimulation, whereas it inhibited the induction of long-term depression (LTD) triggered by 900 pulses of 1-Hz stimulation. In nontreated slices, 900 pulses of stimuli induced LTD when applied at lower frequencies (1–3 Hz), and induced LTP when applied at a higher frequency (30 Hz). NE (10 μM) caused a shift of the frequency-response relationship in the direction preferring potentiation. The effect of NE was most prominent at a stimulus frequency of 10 Hz, which induced no changes in control slices but clearly induced LTP in the presence of NE. The facilitating effect of NE on the induction of LTP by 10-Hz stimulation was blocked by theβ-adrenergic receptor antagonist timolol (50 μM), but not by the α receptor antagonist phentolamine (50 μM), and was mimicked by the β-agonist isoproterenol (0.3 μM), but not by the α1 agonist phenylephrine (10 μM). The induction of LTD by 1-Hz stimulation was prevented by isoproterenol but not by phenylephrine, indicating that the activation of β-receptors is responsible for these effects of NE. NE (10 μM) also prevented the reversal of LTP (depotentiation) by 900 pulses of 1-Hz stimulation delivered 30 min after LTP induction. In contrast to effects on naive (nonpotentiated) synapses, the effect of NE on previously potentiated synapses was only partially mimicked by isoproterenol, but fully mimicked by coapplication of phenylephrine and isoproterenol. In addition, the effect of NE was attenuated either by phentolamine or by timolol, indicating that activation of both α1 and β-receptors is required. These results show that NE plays a modulatory role in the induction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Althoughβ-receptor activation is essential, α1 receptor activation is also necessary in determining effects on previously potentiated synapses.

AMPA Silencing Is a Prerequisite for Developmental Long-Term Potentiation in the Hippocampal CA1 Region

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 2605-2614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therése Abrahamsson ◽  
Bengt Gustafsson ◽  
Eric Hanse
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Synaptic Strength ◽  
Ca1 Region ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1 Region ◽  
Silent Synapses ◽  
Term Potentiation ◽  
Hippocampal Ca1 ◽  
Hippocampal Ca3

AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) unsilencing is an often proposed expression mechanism both for developmental long-term potentiation (LTP), involved in circuitry refinement during brain development, and for mature LTP, involved in learning and memory. In the hippocampal CA3–CA1 connection naïve (nonstimulated) synapses are AMPA signaling and AMPA-silent synapses are created from naïve AMPA-signaling (AMPA-labile) synapses by test-pulse synaptic activation (AMPA silencing). To investigate to what extent LTPs at different developmental stages are explained by AMPA unsilencing, the amount of LTP obtained at these different developmental stages was related to the amount of AMPA silencing that preceded the induction of LTP. When examined in the second postnatal week Hebbian induction was found to produce no more stable potentiation than that causing a return to the naïve synaptic strength existing prior to the AMPA silencing. Moreover, in the absence of a preceding AMPA silencing Hebbian induction produced no stable potentiation above the naïve synaptic strength. Thus this early, or developmental, LTP is nothing more than an unsilencing (dedepression) and stabilization of the AMPA signaling that was lost by the prior AMPA silencing. This dedepression and stabilization of AMPA signaling was mimicked by the presence of the protein kinase A activator forskolin. As the relative degree of AMPA silencing decreased with development, LTP manifested itself more and more as a “genuine” potentiation (as opposed to a dedepression) not explained by unsilencing and stabilization of AMPA-labile synapses. This “genuine,” or mature, LTP rose from close to nothing of total LTP prior to postnatal day (P)13, to about 70% of total LTP at P16, and to about 90% of total LTP at P30. Developmental LTP, by stabilization of AMPA-labile synapses, thus seems adapted to select synaptic connections to the growing synaptic network. Mature LTP, by instead strengthening existing stable connections between cells, may then create functionally tightly connected cell assemblies within this network.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document