scholarly journals Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Johansson ◽  
Sophie Keller ◽  
Henrike Winkler ◽  
Thomas Ostermann ◽  
Raimund Weitgasser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Support Intervention ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Peer Support Intervention

Aim. Testing the effectiveness of peer support additionally to a disease management programme (DMP) for type 2 diabetes patients.Methods. Unblinded cluster-randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 49 general practices, province of Salzburg, Austria. All patients enrolled in the DMP were eligible,n=337participated (intervention: 148 in 19 clusters; control: 189 in 20 clusters). The peer support intervention ran over 24 months and consisted of peer supporter recruitment and training, and group meetings weekly for physical exercise and monthly for discussion of diabetes related topics.Results. At two-year follow-up, adjusted analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference inHbA1cchange of 0.14% (21.97 mmol/mol) in favour of the intervention (95% CI −0.08 to 0.36%,p=0.22). Baseline values were 7.02 ± 1.25% in the intervention and 7.08 ± 1.25 in the control group. None of the secondary outcome measures showed significant differences except for improved quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS) in controls (4.3 points on a scale of 100; 95% CI 0.08 to 8.53,p=0.046) compared to the intervention group.Conclusion. Our peer support intervention as an additional DMP component showed no significant effect onHbA1cand secondary outcome measures. Further RTCs with a longer follow-up are needed to reveal whether peer support will have clinically relevant effects.Trial Registration. This trial has been registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. (ISRCTN10291077).

scholarly journals Targeted and tailored pharmacist-led intervention to improve adherence to antihypertensive drugs among patients with type 2 diabetes in Indonesia: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e034507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofa D Alfian ◽  
Rizky Abdulah ◽  
Petra Denig ◽  
Job F M van Boven ◽  
Eelko Hak
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Antihypertensive Drugs ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Programme ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionCurrent intervention programme to improve drug adherence are either too complex or expensive for implementation and scale-up in low-middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to assess the process and effects of implementing a low-cost, targeted and tailored pharmacist intervention among patients with type 2 diabetes who are non-adherent to antihypertensive drugs in a real-world primary care Indonesian setting.Methods and analysisA cluster randomised controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up will be conducted in 10 community health centres (CHCs) in Indonesia. Type 2 diabetes patients aged 18 years and older who reported non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs according to the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) are eligible to participate. Patients in CHCs randomised to the intervention group will receive a tailored intervention based on their personal adherence barriers. Interventions may include reminders, habit-based strategies, family support, counselling to educate and motivate patients, and strategies to address other drug-related problems. Interventions will be provided at baseline and at a 1-month follow-up. Simple question-based flowcharts and an innovative adherence intervention wheel are provided to support the pharmacy staff. Patients in CHCs randomised to the control group will receive usual care based on the Indonesian guideline. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in medication adherence change from baseline to 3-month follow-up assessed by MARS. Secondary outcomes include changes in patients’ blood pressure, their medication beliefs assessed by the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)-specific, as well as process characteristics of the intervention programme from a pharmacist and patient perspective.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia (No. 859/UN6.KEP/EC/2019) and all patients will provide written informed consent prior to participation. The findings of the study will be disseminated through international conferences, one or more peer-reviewed journals and reports to key stakeholders.Trial registration numberNCT04023734.

scholarly journals Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial

BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 342 (feb15 1) ◽  
pp. d715-d715 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Smith ◽  
G. Paul ◽  
A. Kelly ◽  
D. L. Whitford ◽  
E. O'Shea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Peer Support ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled

scholarly journals Effect of faecal calprotectin testing on referrals for children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e045444
Author(s):  
Sophie Ansems ◽  
Marjolein Berger ◽  
Patrick van Rheenen ◽  
Karin Vermeulen ◽  
Gina Beugel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Referral Rate ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionChildren with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms are frequently seen in primary care, yet general practitioners (GPs) often experience challenges distinguishing functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) from organic disorders. We, therefore, aim to evaluate whether a test strategy that includes point-of-care testing (POCT) for faecal calprotectin (FCal) can reduce the referral rate to paediatric specialist care among children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. The study findings will contribute to improving the recommendations on FCal use among children in primary care.Methods and analysisIn this pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, we will randomise general practices into intervention and control groups. The intervention group will use FCal-POCT when indicated, after completing online training about its indication, interpretation and follow-up as well as communicating an FGID diagnosis. The control group will test and treat according to Dutch GP guidelines, which advise against FCal testing in children. GPs will include children aged 4–18 years presenting to primary care with chronic diarrhoea and/or recurrent abdominal pain. The primary outcome will be the referral rate for children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms within 6 months after the initial assessment. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated by questionnaires completed at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. These outcomes will include parental satisfaction and concerns, gastrointestinal symptoms, impact of symptoms on daily function, quality of life, proportion of children with paediatrician-diagnosed FGID referred to secondary care, health service use and healthcare costs. A sample size calculation indicates that we need to recruit 158 GP practices to recruit 406 children.Ethics and disseminationThe Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands) approved this study (MREC number: 201900309). The study results will be made available to patients, GPs, paediatricians and laboratories via peer-reviewed publications and in presentations at (inter)national conferences.Trial registration numberThe Netherlands Trial Register: NL7690 (Pre-results)

scholarly journals Indigenous health worker support for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Mana Tū programme

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e019572
Author(s):  
Vanessa Selak ◽  
Tereki Stewart ◽  
Yannan Jiang ◽  
Jennifer Reid ◽  
Taria Tane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Determinants Of Health ◽  
Pacific People ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications are more common among Māori and Pacific people compared with other ethnic groups in New Zealand. Comprehensive and sustained approaches that address social determinants of health are required to address this condition, including culturally specific interventions. Currently, New Zealand has no comprehensive T2DM management programme for Māori or Pacific people.Methods and analysisThe Mana Tū programme was developed by a Māori-led collaborative of primary healthcare workers and researchers, and codesigned with whānau (patients and their families) in order to address this gap. The programme is based in primary care and has three major components: a Network hub, Kai Manaaki (skilled case managers who work with whānau with poorly controlled diabetes) and a cross-sector network of services to whom whānau can be referred to address the wider determinants of health. The Network hub supports the delivery of the intervention through training of Kai Manaaki, referrals management, cross-sector network development and quality improvement of the programme. A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mana Tū programme among Māori, Pacific people or those living in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation who also have poorly controlled diabetes (glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c, >65 mmol/mol (8%)), compared with being on a wait list for the programme. A total of 400 participants will be included from 10 general practices (5 practices per group, 40 participants per practice). The primary outcome is HbA1c at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include blood pressure, lipid levels, body mass index and smoking status at 12 months. This protocol outlines the proposed study design and analysis methods.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval for the trial has been obtained from the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee (17/NTB/249). Findings will be presented to practices and their patients at appropriate fora, and disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberACTRN12617001276347; Pre-result.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document