scholarly journals Effects of Two Current Great Saphenous Vein Thermal Ablation Methods on Visual Analog Scale and Quality of Life

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soner Sanioglu ◽  
Halit Yerebakan ◽  
Mustafa Bora Farsak
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Fiber Laser ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Radial Fiber ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Background. The aim of the study is to compare the current two endovenous thermal ablation methods by examining the effects on the visual analog scale (VAS) and the short form-36® quality of life index. Methods. Ninety-six patients who underwent unilateral endovenous thermal ablation of great saphenous vein were included. ClosureFast™ catheters were used in the RFA group and 1470 nm radial fiber laser catheters were used in the EVLA group. Results. The RFA group consisted of 41 patients and the EVLA group consisted of 55 patients. The preoperative baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. On the day of operation, VAS values were 2.8±1.1 in the RFA group and 3.6±1.8 in the EVLA group (p=0.02). Comparisons of short form-36 parameters in both groups showed them to be similar except the pain detected at postoperative 1st week (48.1±5.4 for RFA, 44.9±7.6 for EVLA, p=0.04). Conclusion. Results in postprocedural quality of life were found to be similar in both of the techniques. However, in terms of postoperative pain, radiofrequency ablation is still superior to the 1470 nm radial fiber laser catheters.

Review of Endovenous Thermal Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omeed Ahadiat ◽  
Shauna Higgins ◽  
Alexandre Ly ◽  
Azadeh Nazemi ◽  
Ashley Wysong
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

scholarly journals Endovenous Ablation of Varicose Veins Experience at Tertiary Neurological Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
Sandeep Raj Pandey ◽  
George Bush Jung Katwal ◽  
Sharad Hari Gajuryal
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Introduction: Endovascular ablation of varicose vein either by radiofrequency ablationor laser delivers sufficient thermal energy to incompetent vein segments to produce irreversible occlusion, fibrosis and ultimately disappearance of the vein.Materials and Methods: Three hundred patients with varicosities due to primary or recurrent sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junction and great or small saphenous veinreflux underwent out-patient and in-patient endovenous thermal ablation between January 2015 to December 2017.The great saphenous vein was ablated from 2-2.5 cm below sapheno-femoral junction to knee and the small saphenous vein was ablated from mid-calf to the sapheno-popliteal junction.Results: Patient returning time to normal activity was 0–1 days returning to normal daily activity were immediately after 4 hours. Duplex ultrasound follow-up (median 3-months) confirmed abolition of sapheno-femoral junction/great saphenous vein and sapheno-popliteal junction/small saphenous vein reflux in all limbs. There were no instances of skin burns or deep vein thrombosis, but, 7 patients developed transient cutaneous numbness involving sural nerve and 1 developed endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.Conclusions: This is likely to be more effective than conventional surgery, although long-term follow up is required.  Despite being expensive in comparison to open surgery, endovenous thermal ablation is superior in terms of: minimizing pain, avoiding incision, early mobilisation and discharge. Changing the treatment distance from 2 cm to 2.5 cm peripheral to the Deep veins junction may result in a diminished incidence of endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.

A randomised controlled trial of perivenous tumescent anaesthesia in addition to general anaesthesia for surgical ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Nandhra ◽  
Tom Wallace ◽  
Joseph El-Sheikha ◽  
Daniel Carradice ◽  
Ian Chetter
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Bodily Pain ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Surgical Ligation ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction Open surgical ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein is a highly cost-effective treatment when compared with conservative management and foam sclerotherapy but has limitations including post-operative morbidity and pain. This study aims to identify if the addition of tumescent anaesthesia could improve patient outcomes following treatment. Methods Patients with primary superficial venous incompetence undergoing open surgical ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein were randomised to either General Anaesthesia (GA) alone (GA) procedure or the addition of tumescent (G + T). The primary outcome was bodily pain (within SF-36) at one week. Additional outcomes included post-procedural pain score (100 mm visual analogue scale), complications and quality of life. Results A total of 90 patients were randomised for inclusion. There was no significant difference in primary outcome; bodily pain at one week. Secondary outcome of 4-h post-procedural scores were significantly lower in the G + T group (32 (20–54) mm vs. (GA alone) 56 (24–70) mm (P = 0.016)). Complications were minor and equivalent. Both groups saw a significant increase (worsening) in Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire scores at week 1 with the G + T group faring worse at six weeks (10.0 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 5.6–17.9) vs. 4.3 (IQR 2.7–7.9) P = 0.004). Conclusion The G + T group did not demonstrate a significant difference in the one-week bodily pain domain. The addition of tumescent anaesthesia does improve immediate post-operative pain but appears to negatively impact on six-week quality of life. EudraCT Number: 2011-005574-39

Impact of Great Saphenous Vein Foam Sclerotherapy on Quality of Life and Photoplethysmography Findings in Chronic Venous Insufficiency

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-375
Author(s):  
Felipe Coelho Neto ◽  
Rodrigo Gomes de Oliveira ◽  
Fernando Thomazinho ◽  
Anna Paula Weinhardt Batista ◽  
Iruena Moraes Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Chronic Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Venous Insufficiency ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy

Comparative efficacy and life quality effects of surgical stripping, radiofrequency ablation, and cyanoacrylate embolization in patients undergoing treatment for great saphenous vein insufficiency

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552094729
Author(s):  
Yasin Ay ◽  
Esra Gunes ◽  
Sevket Tuna Turkkolu ◽  
Emre Selcuk ◽  
Muhittin Calim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
The Other ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Vein Insufficiency

Objectives To compare traditional surgery with two minimally invasive endo-venous procedures in terms of their long-term effect on the quality of life in great saphenous vein insufficiency (GSV). Method This prospective observational study included 217 patients that underwent surgical stripping (n = 62), radiofrequency ablation (n = 70), or cyanoacrylate embolization (n = 85) for the treatment of GSV insufficiency. Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) assessments were made, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and Chronic Venous Insufficiency quality of life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) were administered, before and 1 year after the treatments. Results Surgical stripping group had significantly higher closure rates than the other groups (p < 0.05). At 12 months, decrease in VCSS scores was less pronounced in the cyanoacrylate embolization group when compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). Improvement in CIVIQ-14 scores was better in the radiofrequency ablation group when compared to the cyanoacrylate embolization group (p < 0.05). Surgical stripping or radiofrequency ablation groups performed better on several domains of SF-36, when compared to the cyanoacrylate embolization group. Conclusions Surgical stripping and radiofrequency ablation seem to provide a better quality of life results at one year in patients undergoing treatment for GSV insufficiency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document