P4-12-11: Myelodysplastic Syndrome Post Primary Breast Cancer Treatment: Cases from a Community Cancer Center: 1990–2010.

Author(s):  
HG Kaplan ◽  
JA Malmgren ◽  
MK Atwood
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 800-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Cheng ◽  
Michael D. Swartz ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Asha S. Kapadia ◽  
Dejian Lai ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
W H Wolberg ◽  
M A Tanner ◽  
E P Romsaas ◽  
D L Trump ◽  
J F Malec

Primary breast cancer treatment is determined by tumor factors and by patient preference. Breast cancer treatments that preserve the cosmetic appearance of the breast are appealing and effective for appropriately selected patients; long-term survival following tumor excision and breast irradiation appears to be comparable to that for mastectomy. Since April 1981, when a protocol was developed and treatment options were offered, factors influencing treatment selection have been analyzed in 206 consecutive primary breast cancer patients. Mastectomy was dictated by tumor-related factors in 96 patients (47%); 110 patients (53%) had the option of mastectomy or conservation--tumor excision plus radiotherapy to the breast. Among these 110 eligible patients, 54 chose conservation (49%) and 56 chose mastectomy (51%). Intraoperative findings for ten patients electing conservation necessitated mastectomy, so conservation was accomplished for 44 (21%) of those treated for breast cancer. Beginning in July 1982, breast cancer patients took a battery of psychosexual assessments before any operation (Profile of Mood States [POMS], Health Locus of Control Scale [HLCS] Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test [MAT], Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale [PAIS], Derogatis Sexual Function Inventory [DSFI], Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory [MCMI], and a Breast Cancer Information Test [BCIT]). Comparisons of psychologic and demographic variables were made between patients who chose mastectomy and those who chose conservation. No demographic variable was statistically significantly related to choice, although older women tended to select mastectomy more than younger women. Compared with those who elected conservation, women who elected mastectomy were more tense and anxious (P less than .01), more introverted (P less than .01), felt more depressed and dejected (P less than .05), and reported more sexual problems (P less than .05). Those who elected conservation valued their physical appearance more highly (P less than .01) and were generally more self-interested (P less than .05). Mastectomy was dictated by medical considerations for approximately half of patients with breast cancer. Among candidates for breast conservation, the importance of retaining the breast appeared to be determined to a significant degree by measurable psychological factors.


Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Corso ◽  
Patrick Maisonneuve ◽  
Giorgia Irene Santomauro ◽  
Alessandra Margherita De Scalzi ◽  
Antonio Toesca ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19593-e19593
Author(s):  
Harveshp D. Mogal ◽  
Emad S. Allam ◽  
Julie A. Margenthaler ◽  
Ling Chen ◽  
Katherine S. Virgo ◽  
...  

e19593 Background: Breast carcinoma is the most common cancer among American women except for skin cancer. Over 200,000 patients are diagnosed with breast cancer annually in the U.S. Most receive curative-intent treatment. About 2.5 million women with a history of breast cancer are now alive and eligible for surveillance. ASCO has published evidence-based guidelines for surveillance after primary breast cancer treatment but dramatic variation in the actual practice patterns of ASCO clinicians has been shown. We sought to evaluate potential factors that motivate expert clinicians as they design their own surveillance strategies. Methods: A custom-designed survey instrument with 11 questions about putative motivating factors was e-mailed to the 3,245 ASCO members who had indicated that breast cancer was a major focus of their clinical practice. Responses were submitted on a 10-level Likert-type scale. The percentage of responses for each point on the scale for each of the potential motivating factors was tabulated. We ranked the factors in accordance with the percentage responses on the scale. Results: 1,013 responses (31%) were submitted; 734 (73%) were evaluable. “Potential detection of a second primary breast cancer” was the strongest motivating factor (53% with a score of "strongly agree"). Conclusions: We believe this is the first empirical evidence about factors that may motivate expert clinicians in selecting surveillance strategies. Understanding these factors may be useful in devising methods to decrease the present variation in these strategies. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2107-2115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floortje K. Ploos van Amstel ◽  
Sanne W. van den Berg ◽  
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Marieke F. M. Gielissen ◽  
Judith B. Prins ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document