Abstract P2-11-11: Patient Reported Outcomes after Breast Cancer Surgery and Adjuvant Therapy from a German Breast Cancer Centre

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Feiten ◽  
J Dünnebacke ◽  
J Heymanns ◽  
H Köppler ◽  
J Thomalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Cancer Centre ◽  
Patient Reported

Patient reported outcomes of autologous fat grafting after breast cancer surgery

The Breast ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.W.W. Brown ◽  
M. Kabir ◽  
K.A. Sherman ◽  
F. Meybodi ◽  
J.R. French ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Autologous Fat Grafting ◽  
Autologous Fat ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Measuring upper limb function and patient reported outcomes after major breast cancer surgery: a pilot study in an Asian cohort

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Siang Chan ◽  
Ding Zeng ◽  
Joelle Hoi Ting Leung ◽  
Belinda Si Yin Ooi ◽  
Kit Teng Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Upper Limb Function ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Major Breast ◽  
Asian Cohort

Prioritizing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Surgery Quality Improvement

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara H. Javid ◽  
Sarah O. Lawrence ◽  
Danielle C. Lavallee
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcome Measures May Add Value in Breast Cancer Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 3563-3571 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lagendijk ◽  
L. S. E. van Egdom ◽  
F. E. E. van Veen ◽  
E. L. Vos ◽  
M. A. M. Mureau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Linguistic and Psychometric Validity of the Malay BREAST-Q in Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery in Malaysia

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 115s-115s
Author(s):  
B. Shunnmugam ◽  
S. Sinnadurai ◽  
S.H. Chua ◽  
T. Islam ◽  
M.H. See ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Psychometric Validation ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Background: BREAST-Q is a PROMs used to measure and assess patient satisfaction and quality of life before and after breast cancer surgery. BREAST-Q composed of 5 different modules and each module comprised of multiple scales. Each module has preoperative and postoperative versions to assess the impact of surgery. Four subscales with common items from the 5 modules: “satisfaction with the breast”, psychosocial, sexual and physical well-being were subjected to testing. Two other subscales, “satisfaction with overall outcomes” and “satisfaction with the care” were only validated linguistically. Currently, the BREAST-Q has already been translated into 25 languages. Linguistic and psychometric validation of BREAST-Q has not been performed in Malaysia. Aim: To translate the BREAST-Q into Malay language and perform psychometric validation. Methods: Translation of the English BREAST-Q to Malay language was done based on linguistic validation protocol provided by MAPI Research Trust. Content and face validation were performed to determine contextual accuracy, acceptability and understanding of the items. The finalised Malay BREAST-Q then underwent psychometric testing. Breast cancer patients (n=186) who were planned for breast cancer surgery were conveniently sampled at the breast clinic of UMMC between June 2015 to June 2016. Consented participants completed the questionnaire in the same visit following their diagnosis. Retest was done 2-3 weeks after the first questionnaire administration in 62 patients who were admitted for their surgery. Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. Results: Content experts (4 breast surgeons) agreed the items in BREAST-Q comprehensively measured the concept of interest and I-CVI for each item was 1.0. Participants agreed the questionnaire was comprehensive and easy to understand. The average time taken to complete the questionnaire was 15.3 minutes. Test–retest analysis showed good reproducibility with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.71-0.98. Internal consistencies were good for all items in each subscale with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.83-0.95. The highest interitem correlation for each item with at least one other item in the construct ranged from 0.47 to 0.90. The lowest corrected item-total correlation (CITC) values ranged from 0.47 to 0.72. In exploratory factor analysis, the KMO values were excellent in all 4 subscales (0.76, 0.92, 0.91, and 0.86). Single factor was extracted in 3 subscales that explained more than 50% of the variance and 3 factors (breast pain, general pain, and discomfort) were extracted in “physical well-being” subscale that cumulatively explained more than 50% of the variance. Conclusion: The Malay BREAST-Q demonstrated good reliability, content and face validity, and excellent psychometric properties. Hence, we propose the use of the Malay BREAST-Q to measure patient reported outcomes among breast cancer patients in Malaysia undergoing breast cancer surgery.

scholarly journals Patient Reported Outcome Measures may add value in breast cancer surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. e39
Author(s):  
M. Lagendijk ◽  
L. Van Egdom ◽  
F. van Veen ◽  
E. Vos ◽  
M. Mureau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals The impact of age on patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic versus conventional breast cancer surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ritter ◽  
B. M. Ling ◽  
I. Oberhauser ◽  
G. Montagna ◽  
L. Zehnpfennig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose Some studies have indicated age-specific differences in quality of life (QoL) among breast cancer (BC) patients. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes after conventional and oncoplastic breast surgery in two distinct age groups. Methods Patients who underwent oncoplastic and conventional breast surgery for stage I-III BC, between 6/2011–3/2019, were identified from a prospectively maintained database. QoL was prospectively evaluated using the Breast-Q questionnaire. Comparisons were made between women < 60 and ≥ 60 years. Results One hundred thirty-three patients were included. Seventy-three of them were ≥ 60 years old. 15 (20.5%) of them received a round-block technique (RB) / oncoplastic breast-conserving surgeries (OBCS), 10 (13.7%) underwent nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM) with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) reconstruction, 23 (31.5%) underwent conventional breast-conserving surgeries (CBCS), and 25 (34.2%) received total mastectomy (TM). Sixty patients were younger than 60 years, 15 (25%) thereof received RB/OBCS, 22 (36.7%) NSM/DIEP, 17 (28.3%) CBCS, and 6 (10%) TM. Physical well-being chest and psychosocial well-being scores were significantly higher in older women compared to younger patients (88.05 vs 75.10; p < 0.001 and 90.46 vs 80.71; p = 0.002, respectively). In multivariate linear regression, longer time intervals had a significantly positive effect on the scales Physical Well-being Chest (p = 0.014) and Satisfaction with Breasts (p = 0.004). No significant results were found concerning different types of surgery. Conclusion Our findings indicate that age does have a relevant impact on postoperative QoL. Patient counseling should include age-related considerations, however, age itself cannot be regarded as a contraindication for oncoplastic surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document