scholarly journals E3611—A Randomized Phase II Study of Ipilimumab at 3 or 10 mg/kg Alone or in Combination with High-Dose Interferon-α2b in Advanced Melanoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 524-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
Sandra J. Lee ◽  
Xiaoxue Li ◽  
Uma N.M. Rao ◽  
Arun Nagarajan ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9599-TPS9599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Lopez-Martin ◽  
Alfonso Berrocal ◽  
María González-Cao

TPS9599 Background: Previous clinical trials have shown that vemurafenib significantly increases PFS and OS in untreated BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma patients. Nevertheless, disease progression occurs after a median of 6-7 months since start of vemurafenib. Several mechanisms of acquired resistance to vemurafenib result in reactivation of MAPK pathway. Upfront addition of a MEK inhibitor (MEKi) to vemurafenib delays secondary resistance to BRAFi. The combination of cobimetinib, a MEKi, plus vemurafenib as a continuous administration was approved by FDA in 2,015 in untreated metastatic BRAFV600 advanced melanoma patients based on an increase in PFS and OS achieved in a phase III trial (coBRIM trial). Preclinical models have shown that continuous vemurafenib dosing promotes the clonal expansion of drug-resistant cells, and intermittent dosing could serve to eliminate the fitness advantage of the resistant cells and delay the onset of drug-resistant disease (Das Thakur, Nature 2013). These observations and some clinical case reports support upfront evaluation of alternative dosing regimens of MAPK pathway inhibition. Methods: This is a randomized phase II study to explore the efficacy and safety of two schedules of administration of vemurafenib in combination with cobimetinib (continuous – 28-day cycles with vemurafenib 960 mg PO BID, Days 1-28, and cobimetinib 60 mg PO QD, Days 1-21 – and intermittent – same dose/schedule during first 12 weeks, and then, same doses with the following schedule: vemurafenib 4 weeks on /2 weeks off, and cobimetinib 3 weeks on/ 3 weeks off), in patients with untreated, BRAFV600 mutated, unresectable, measurable (RECIST 1.1), locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Prior adjuvant immunotherapy is allowed. Primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include: OS, ORR, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and safety. Additional translational research to analyze predictive factors and mechanism of resistance will be explored. The trial is in progress; 56 of up to 116 planned pts have been recruited at the end of December 2016 (enrollment started in June 2015). Clinical trial information: NCT02583516.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 950-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bafaloukos ◽  
D. Tsoutsos ◽  
H. Kalofonos ◽  
S. Chalkidou ◽  
P. Panagiotou ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9120-TPS9120
Author(s):  
Madeeha Ashraf ◽  
John M. Kirkwood ◽  
Marc S. Ernstoff ◽  
Hussein Abdul-Hassan Tawbi ◽  
Paul Henry Frankel ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 2178-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. McDermott ◽  
Jeffrey A. Sosman ◽  
Rene Gonzalez ◽  
F. Stephen Hodi ◽  
Gerald P. Linette ◽  
...  

PurposeThis phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma.Patients and MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage III (unresectable) or IV melanoma. A total of 101 patients received placebo plus dacarbazine (n = 50) or sorafenib plus dacarbazine (n = 51). On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received intravenous dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2for a maximum of 16 cycles. Oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo was administered twice a day continuously. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent assessment. Secondary and tertiary end points included time to progression (TTP), response rate, and overall survival (OS).ResultsMedian PFS in the sorafenib plus dacarbazine arm was 21.1 weeks versus 11.7 weeks in the placebo plus dacarbazine arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.665; P = .068). There were statistically significant improvements in PFS rates at 6 and 9 months, and in TTP (median, 21.1 v 11.7 weeks; HR, 0.619) in favor of the sorafenib plus dacarbazine arm. No difference in OS was observed (median, 51.3 v 45.6 weeks in the placebo plus dacarbazine and sorafenib plus dacarbazine arms, respectively; HR, 1.022). The regimen was well tolerated and had a manageable toxicity profile.ConclusionSorafenib plus dacarbazine was well tolerated in patients with advanced melanoma and yielded an encouraging improvement in PFS. Based on these findings, additional studies with the combination are warranted in this patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document