Abstract P6-09-26: Effect of race on triple negative breast cancer outcomes

Author(s):  
C Mosquera ◽  
R Amin ◽  
JH Wong
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Nowakowska ◽  
Xiudong Lei ◽  
Mikayla R Thompson ◽  
Simona Flora Shaitelman ◽  
Mackenzie Wehner ◽  
...  

523 Background: Statins have been shown to target pathways related to breast cancer carcinogenesis, specifically in more aggressive breast cancer subtypes such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Given the limited toxicity profile, low cost, and ease of use of statins, an association between statin therapy and improved breast cancer outcomes, particularly in aggressive breast cancers with more limited treatment options, could have important public health implications. Here we examine the association of statin therapy with breast cancer outcomes in women with stage I-III breast cancer, specifically TNBC. Methods: We utilized Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare and Texas Cancer Registry (TCR)-Medicare data. We included women age 66 years or older with histologically confirmed stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed from 2008-2015. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to examine the association of statin use with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) adjusting for age, race, education, state buy-in, residence area, stage, subtype, endocrine therapy, radiation, chemotherapy, surgery, baseline statin use, comorbidity, and baseline hypertension. For BCSS, we accounted for the competing risk of death using the Fine and Grey method. We required all individuals to survive until 12 months post-diagnosis, which we defined as the start of the follow-up period, to account for immortal time bias. Results: We identified 45,063 patients with stage I-III breast cancer meeting inclusion criteria, out of which 22,518 (50.0%) received a statin within one year following diagnosis (statin-users). The 5-year cumulative estimates of breast cancer specific deaths were 5.9% and 6.9% for statin-users and non-users (P <.001), respectively. In the overall cohort, adjusted models showed a statistically significant association between statin use and improved BCSS (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97; P =.021), but no association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.03; P =.23). The association was strongest in patients with TNBC for BCSS (SHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86; P =.006) and OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.95; P =.018). Stratification by stage showed that the effect of statin therapy in TNBC was limited to patients with localized disease. Our results were consistent using propensity score matched models and when limiting our analysis to statin therapy initiated following breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Among women with non-metastatic breast cancer, we found that statin use was associated with an OS and BCSS benefit among women with TNBC. Our data suggest that statins may have a role as an adjuvant therapy in select patients with breast cancer and supports further investigation, particularly among patients with TNBC, for whom effective treatment options are more limited.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Rapiti ◽  
Kim Pinaud ◽  
Pierre O. Chappuis ◽  
Valeria Viassolo ◽  
Aurélie Ayme ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinnadurai Mani ◽  
Jonnalagadda Shirisha ◽  
Awasthi Sanjay ◽  
Manne Upender ◽  
Palle Komaraiah

2015 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Liu ◽  
Qiuyin Cai ◽  
Ping-Ping Bao ◽  
Yinghao Su ◽  
Hui Cai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reina Haque ◽  
Xiaoqing Xu ◽  
Jiaxiao Shi ◽  
Marilyn L. Kwan ◽  
Rowan T. Chlebowski

Background: It is unknown how subse­quent breast cancer outcomes vary by bio­logic subtype and race/ethnicity in a diverse cohort of breast cancer survivors.Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 6,154 insured breast cancer survivors (AJCC TNM stages 0–IV) diagnosed between 1996-2007 and followed them through 1/1/2010 for subsequent breast cancer events (recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, metastasis, mortality). We compared subsequent breast cancer rates by race/ethnicity groups and biologic subtype (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple negative). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for sociodemographics, cancer treatments, and tumor characteristics.Results: The cohort was diverse: 62.4% non-Hispanic White, 13.2% Hispanic, 14.9% African American, and 9.5% Asian. We identified 1,456 subsequent breast cancer events over 22,830 person-years. Although certain Asian women had higher crude subsequent breast cancer rates com­pared with Whites, within each biologic subtype category, these disparities disap­peared in the multivariable analyses. After accounting for race/ethnicity, compared with women with luminal A tumors (refer­ence), women with luminal B (adjusted HR=3.65, 95% CI: 3.08-4.32), HER2- enriched (adjusted HR=2.81, 95% CI: 2.25-3.51) and triple negative (adjusted HR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.54) tumors had statistically increased risks of subsequent breast cancer. Factors that were statistically significantly associated with increased risk included higher stage, larger tumor size, positive lymph nodes, and no adjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy (all P<.025).Discussion: Our data suggest that dispari­ties in subsequent breast cancer outcomes were more strongly associated with tumor characteristics and non-use of adjuvant treatments than race/ethnicity. Ethn Dis. 2018;28(4):565-574; doi:10.18865/ed.28.4.565.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document