Abstract CT062: A Phase I study of the safety and immunogenicity of personalized mutation-derived tumor vaccine and treatment fields in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Author(s):  
Adilia Hormigo ◽  
Alex Rubinsteyn ◽  
Julia Kodysh ◽  
Ana Blazquez ◽  
Nina Bhardwaj
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi8-vi8
Author(s):  
Adilia Hormigo ◽  
Alex Rubinsteyn ◽  
Julia Kodysh ◽  
Raymund Yong ◽  
Constantinos Hadjipanayis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Chen Wei ◽  
Peng-Wei Hsu ◽  
Hong-Chieh Tsai ◽  
Ya-Jui Lin ◽  
Ko-Ting Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractAsunercept (company code APG101 [Apogenix AG]; company code CAN008 [CANbridge Pharmaceuticals]) is a novel glycosylated fusion protein that has shown promising effectiveness in glioblastoma. This Phase I study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability and safety of asunercept in combination with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide (RT/TMZ) in Asian patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This was the Phase I portion of a Phase I/II open label, multicenter trial of asunercept plus standard RT/TMZ. Adults with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma received surgical resection followed by standard RT/TMZ plus asunercept 200 mg/week (Cohort 1) or 400 mg/week (Cohort 2) by 30-min IV infusion. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of asunercept during concurrent asunercept and RT/TMZ; dose-limiting toxicities were observed for each dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). All patients (Cohort 1, n = 3; Cohort 2, n = 7) completed ≥ 7 weeks of asunercept treatment. No DLTs were experienced. Only one possibly treatment-related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), Grade 1 gingival swelling, was observed. No Grade > 3 TEAEs were reported and no TEAE led to treatment discontinuation. Systemic asunercept exposure increased proportionally with dose and showed low inter-patient variability. The PFS6 rate was 33.3% and 57.1% for patients in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in Cohort 2 maintained a PFS rate of 57.1% at Month 12. Adding asunercept to standard RT/TMZ was safe and well tolerated in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and 400 mg/week resulted in encouraging efficacy.Trial registration NCT02853565, August 3, 2016.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi7-vi7
Author(s):  
Mark Gilbert ◽  
Peixin Zhang ◽  
Andrew Sloan ◽  
Kenneth Aldape ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2064-2064
Author(s):  
E. G. Shaw ◽  
S. A. Grossman ◽  
K. A. Carson ◽  
J. D. Fisher ◽  
L. Kleinberg

2064 Background: Gadolinium texaphyrin (Gad Tex) is a putative radiosensitizer which inhibits cellular respiration resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species and induces apoptosis (Drugs R D. 2004; 5(1):52–7). Methods: The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) consortium conducted a prospective phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of Gad Tex along with brain radiation therapy (RT) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme with KPS > 60. RT was 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days per week over 6 weeks, to localized treatment fields. Two different dosing regimens of Gad Tex were utilized. In regimen A, the initial dose was 2.5 mg/kg with each daily fraction of RT whereas in regimen B it was 5.5 mg/kg with every fraction of RT. Gad Tex was administered 2–5 hours before each radiation treatment. Results: The initial dose in both regimen A and B was found not to be tolerable. Of three patients treated at 2.5 mg/kg/dose on regimen A (daily dosing), one completed planned therapy (30 doses of Gad Tex), one had treatment stopped after 16 doses of Gad Tex when diffuse pulmonary infiltrates with shortness of breath developed and returned after rechallenge with an additional dose of Gad Tex, and one patient developed an allergic reaction after 15 doses of Gad Tex which returned on rechallenge. Of three patients treated at 5.5 mg/kg/dose (qod dosing) on regimen B, one completed planned therapy (15 doses of Gad Tex) after a dose reduction related for skin blisters, and the other two patients discontinued treatment after 9 doses of Gad Tex for debilitating skin blisters. Conclusions: Gad Tex was poorly tolerated as administered in this small phase I study as 4 of 6 patients experienced dose limiting toxicities. As such, NABTT elected not to pursue this drug in subsequent clinical trials. However, similar or more intensive regimens utilizing Gad Tex in combination with brain RT have been successfully administered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and brain metastases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2069-2069
Author(s):  
Y. Muragaki ◽  
T. Maruyama ◽  
H. Iseki ◽  
K. Tsuboi ◽  
A. Matsumura ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jan Drappatz ◽  
Andrew D. Norden ◽  
Eric T. Wong ◽  
Lisa M. Doherty ◽  
Debra C. LaFrankie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document