Phase I study of gadolinium texaphyrin in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2064-2064
Author(s):  
E. G. Shaw ◽  
S. A. Grossman ◽  
K. A. Carson ◽  
J. D. Fisher ◽  
L. Kleinberg
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Initial Dose ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Tumor Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cellular Respiration ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2064 Background: Gadolinium texaphyrin (Gad Tex) is a putative radiosensitizer which inhibits cellular respiration resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species and induces apoptosis (Drugs R D. 2004; 5(1):52–7). Methods: The New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) consortium conducted a prospective phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of Gad Tex along with brain radiation therapy (RT) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme with KPS > 60. RT was 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days per week over 6 weeks, to localized treatment fields. Two different dosing regimens of Gad Tex were utilized. In regimen A, the initial dose was 2.5 mg/kg with each daily fraction of RT whereas in regimen B it was 5.5 mg/kg with every fraction of RT. Gad Tex was administered 2–5 hours before each radiation treatment. Results: The initial dose in both regimen A and B was found not to be tolerable. Of three patients treated at 2.5 mg/kg/dose on regimen A (daily dosing), one completed planned therapy (30 doses of Gad Tex), one had treatment stopped after 16 doses of Gad Tex when diffuse pulmonary infiltrates with shortness of breath developed and returned after rechallenge with an additional dose of Gad Tex, and one patient developed an allergic reaction after 15 doses of Gad Tex which returned on rechallenge. Of three patients treated at 5.5 mg/kg/dose (qod dosing) on regimen B, one completed planned therapy (15 doses of Gad Tex) after a dose reduction related for skin blisters, and the other two patients discontinued treatment after 9 doses of Gad Tex for debilitating skin blisters. Conclusions: Gad Tex was poorly tolerated as administered in this small phase I study as 4 of 6 patients experienced dose limiting toxicities. As such, NABTT elected not to pursue this drug in subsequent clinical trials. However, similar or more intensive regimens utilizing Gad Tex in combination with brain RT have been successfully administered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and brain metastases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals EPCT-19. A PHASE I STUDY OF RIBOCICLIB AND EVEROLIMUS FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED NON-BIOPSIED DIFFUSE PONTINE GLIOMAS (DIPG) AND RB+ BIOPSIED DIPG AND HIGH GRADE GLIOMAS (HGG)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii307-iii307
Author(s):  
Mariko DeWire ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Christine Fuller ◽  
Peter de Blank ◽  
Trent Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Genomic aberrations in the cell cycle and mTOR pathways have been reported in diffuse pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade gliomas (HGG). Dual inhibition of CDK4/6 (ribociclib) and mTOR (everolimus) has strong biologic rationale, non-overlapping single-agent toxicities, and adult clinical experience. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ribociclib and everolimus administered during maintenance therapy following radiotherapy was determined in the phase I study as a rolling 6 design. Ribociclib and everolimus were administered once daily for 21 days and 28 days, respectively starting two-four weeks post completion of radiotherapy. All HGG patients and any DIPG patient who had undergone biopsy were screened for RB protein by immunohistochemistry. Eighteen eligible patients enrolled (median age 8 years; range: 2–18). Six patients enrolled at dose levels 1,2, and 3 without dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Currently, five patients are enrolled at dose level 3 expansion cohort. The median number of cycles are 4.5 (range: 1–20+). Among the expansion cohort, one dose limiting toxicity included a grade 3 infection and one patient required a dose reduction in course 3 due to grade 3 ALT and grade 4 hypokalemia. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies on 12 patients suggest an impact of ribociclib on everolimus pharmacokinetics. The MTD/RP2D of ribociclib and everolimus following radiotherapy in newly diagnosed DIPG and HGG is anticipated to be 170 mg/m2/day x 21 days and 1.5 mg/ m2/day every 28 days which is equivalent to the adult RP2D.

scholarly journals Safety and tolerability of asunercept plus standard radiotherapy/temozolomide in Asian patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase I study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Chen Wei ◽  
Peng-Wei Hsu ◽  
Hong-Chieh Tsai ◽  
Ya-Jui Lin ◽  
Ko-Ting Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

AbstractAsunercept (company code APG101 [Apogenix AG]; company code CAN008 [CANbridge Pharmaceuticals]) is a novel glycosylated fusion protein that has shown promising effectiveness in glioblastoma. This Phase I study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability and safety of asunercept in combination with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide (RT/TMZ) in Asian patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This was the Phase I portion of a Phase I/II open label, multicenter trial of asunercept plus standard RT/TMZ. Adults with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma received surgical resection followed by standard RT/TMZ plus asunercept 200 mg/week (Cohort 1) or 400 mg/week (Cohort 2) by 30-min IV infusion. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of asunercept during concurrent asunercept and RT/TMZ; dose-limiting toxicities were observed for each dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). All patients (Cohort 1, n = 3; Cohort 2, n = 7) completed ≥ 7 weeks of asunercept treatment. No DLTs were experienced. Only one possibly treatment-related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), Grade 1 gingival swelling, was observed. No Grade > 3 TEAEs were reported and no TEAE led to treatment discontinuation. Systemic asunercept exposure increased proportionally with dose and showed low inter-patient variability. The PFS6 rate was 33.3% and 57.1% for patients in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in Cohort 2 maintained a PFS rate of 57.1% at Month 12. Adding asunercept to standard RT/TMZ was safe and well tolerated in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and 400 mg/week resulted in encouraging efficacy.Trial registration NCT02853565, August 3, 2016.

scholarly journals ATIM-29. NRG BN002: SAFETY DATA FROM A PHASE I STUDY OF IPILIMUMAB (IPI), NIVOLUMAB (NIVO), AND THE COMBINATION FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi7-vi7
Author(s):  
Mark Gilbert ◽  
Peixin Zhang ◽  
Andrew Sloan ◽  
Kenneth Aldape ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Phase I trial of imexon, Inj. plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15058-15058
Author(s):  
S. J. Cohen ◽  
M. Zalupski ◽  
M. Modiano ◽  
P. Conkling ◽  
D. Mahadevan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Ecog Ps

15058 Background: Imexon for inj. (Amplimexon®, AMP) is an aziridine-containing iminopyrrolidone which causes G2 arrest, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and induction of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. AMP demonstrated synergy with gemcitabine (GEM) in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. This phase I study of AMP plus GEM was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics for both agents (PK) and tumor response. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma received one of two dosing regimens. The first 19 received 30 minute AMP IV days 1–5 and 15–19 followed by 30 minute GEM IV days 1, 8 and 15 Q4 wks (Regimen A). Dosing was modified after 19 pts to administer both AMP and GEM over 30 minutes days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Regimen B). Dose levels (AMP/GEM, in mg/m2) for Regimen A: 200/800, 280/800, 200/1000, and 280/1000, and for Regimen B: 280/1000, 335/1000, 390/1000, 540/1000, and 750/1000. The current cohort is 1000/1000. Pts were assessed for response after cycles 2, 5 and 8. PK and pharmacodynamic (plasma thiol depletion) measurements were obtained during cycle one. Results: Forty-six pts have been treated to date, with 36 having complete toxicity data and evaluable. Pt characteristics: M/F (24/12), Age (mean 60.4 years, range 43–75), ECOG PS 0/1 (56%, 44%), metastatic/locally advanced (91%, 9%). The 36 pts have completed 122.5 cycles of therapy (median 2, range 0.5–12). Common toxicities: anemia (77%), fatigue (71%), nausea (60%), fever (54%), and leukopenia (54%). DLT were 1/6 at 280/1000 (Regimen A - febrile neutropenia), 1/6 at 280/1000 (Regimen B - gr 3 hypotension, gr 4 renal failure), and 1/9 at 390/1000 (gr 3 hyperbilirubinemia). Accrual continues at 1000/1000. Of 36 pts, 4 have had partial responses and 14 stable disease. PK and plasma thiol analysis are ongoing. Conclusions: Imexon can be administered safely with full dose gemcitabine. Accrual continues to define the combination MTD. The response rate in this phase I study compares favorably with historical gemcitabine monotherapy, and further phase II evaluation of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of erlotinib administered concurrently with and after irradiation (RT) in the treatment of children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed intracerebral high-grade glioma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9553-9553
Author(s):  
A. Broniscer ◽  
S. J. Baker ◽  
T. E. Merchant ◽  
F. H. Laningham ◽  
M. Kocak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Exclusion Criterion ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Grade 3

9553 Background: High-grade gliomas are uncommon neoplasms in childhood that portend a poor prognosis. Because of the promising activity of erlotinib in adults with high-grade glioma, we conducted this Phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of erlotinib administered concurrently with and after RT. Methods: Patients between 3 and 25 years of age with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma received erlotinib continuously once daily during and after RT for a maximum of 52 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies of erlotinib and its metabolite OSI-420, and genotyping were performed during course 1 in consenting patients. Use of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants was an exclusion criterion. Dose escalation followed a typical Phase I design (dosage levels of 70, 90, and 120 mg/m2 per day). The DLT-evaluation period comprised the first 8 weeks of erlotinib. Results: Seventeen patients (median age 10.4 yrs; 10 males) were enrolled. Diagnoses consisted of glioblastoma (n=9), anaplastic astrocytoma (n=4), and other high-grade gliomas (n=4). Two of seven patients experienced reversible grade 3 hypokalemia / hypophosphatemia at the 70 mg/m2 level. Once electrolyte abnormalities were excluded as DLT, only one of seven patients at the 120 mg/m2 level has experienced grade 3 diarrhea so far. Pharmacokinetic studies were obtained in 14/17 patients. At the 70 mg/m2 dosage level, the median (range) erlotinib and OSI-420 Cmax and Tmax were 1,405 ng/ml (937–2,180) and 4.1 hr (2.2–8.2) and 158.5 ng/ml (45–203) and 4.1 hr (2.2–7.9), respectively. Three patients have received erlotinib for more than 1 year with disease stabilization. Six patients have already experienced disease progression. Conclusions: Erlotinib administered concurrently with RT on this schedule has been well tolerated. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results are comparable to those observed in adults. Rather than continue to escalate erlotinib dosages, we plan to complete this study and open a phase II study of erlotinib and RT for this same patient population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals ATIM-31. PHASE I STUDY OF TUMOR TREATMENT FIELDS AND A PERSONALIZED MUTATION-DERIVED TUMOR VACCINE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi8-vi8
Author(s):  
Adilia Hormigo ◽  
Alex Rubinsteyn ◽  
Julia Kodysh ◽  
Raymund Yong ◽  
Constantinos Hadjipanayis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Tumor Vaccine ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Tumor Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Phase I Study of Vandetanib With Radiotherapy and Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Drappatz ◽  
Andrew D. Norden ◽  
Eric T. Wong ◽  
Lisa M. Doherty ◽  
Debra C. LaFrankie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document