Abstract PR14: Development of a cancer risk prediction tool for use in the Risk Estimation For Lifestyle Enhancement Combined Trial (REFLECT)

Author(s):  
Artitaya Lophatananon ◽  
Kawthar Alajmi ◽  
Emma Thorpe ◽  
John Hughes ◽  
Joanna Blodgett ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artitaya Lophatananon ◽  
Kawthar Alajmi ◽  
Emma Thorpe ◽  
John Hughes ◽  
Joanna Blodgett ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 421-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artitaya Lophatananon ◽  
Juliet Usher-Smith ◽  
Jackie Campbell ◽  
Joanne Warcaba ◽  
Barbora Silarova ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 841-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Bernard A. Rosner ◽  
Hank Dart ◽  
Esther Wei ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 730-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena C Harty ◽  
Jennifer G McIntosh ◽  
Adrian Bickerstaffe ◽  
Nadira Hewabandu ◽  
Jon D Emery

Abstract Objective Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) globally. Our research team has developed a CRC risk prediction tool for use in primary care to increase targeted screening. This study, Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction tool – patient (‘CRISP-P’), aimed to determine the following to inform a future trial design: (i) the feasibility of self-reporting; (ii) the feasibility of recruitment methods; and (iii) the prevalence of CRC risk. Methods Participants aged between 40 and 75 years were recruited consecutively from three primary care waiting rooms. Participants input data into CRISP on a tablet without receiving clinical advice. Feasibility was evaluated using recruitment rate, timely completion, a self-reported ‘ease-of-use’, score and field notes. Prevalence of CRC risk was calculated using the CRISP model. Results Five hundred sixty-one (90%) patients agreed to use the tool and 424 (84%) rated the tool easy to use. Despite this, 41% of people were unable to complete the questions without assistance. Patients who were older, without tertiary education or with English as their second language were more likely to require assistance (P < 0.001). Thirty-nine percent of patients were low risk, 58% at slightly increased and 2.4% were at moderately increased risk of developing colorectal cancer in the next 5 years. Conclusions The tool was perceived as easy to use, although older, less educated people, and patients with English as their second language needed help. The data support the recruitment methods but not the use of a self-completed tool for an efficacy trial.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kabir ◽  
K Curtius ◽  
I Al-Bakir ◽  
C -H R Choi ◽  
T Graham ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kit Curtius ◽  
Misha Kabir ◽  
Ibrahim Al Bakir ◽  
Chang-Ho Ryan Choi ◽  
Juanda Hartono ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasnuba Jesmin ◽  
Kawsar Ahmed ◽  
Md. Zamilur Rahman ◽  
Md. Badrul Alam Miah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document