Abstract B77: Shared decision-making and mammography screening: A national sample

Author(s):  
Christine M. Gunn ◽  
Marina Soley-Bori ◽  
Tracy A. Battaglia
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 681-691
Author(s):  
Ellie F. Yang ◽  
Dhavan V. Shah ◽  
Elizabeth S. Burnside ◽  
Terry A. Little ◽  
Natalie Garino ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori L. DuBenske ◽  
Sarina Schrager ◽  
Helene McDowell ◽  
Lee G. Wilke ◽  
Amy Trentham-Dietz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Fryd Birkeland

AbstractMalpractice lawsuits are a substantial concern in health systems with miscommunication, inadequate information, and unsuccessful patient involvement in decision-making seeming to be contributing factors. This paper draws attention to the explicit role of informed consent (IC) obtainment in actualized complaint cases and to what extent novel methods to exercise IC through means of shared decision-making (SDM) and supporting tools might be applicable. A national sample of cases from the Health Professionals Disciplinary Board in Denmark is reviewed and discussed together with international legal instruments and case law. It is confirmed that patients claim their right to participate in decision-making about healthcare options. In many situations SDM and accompanying tools would apply and possibly they could sometimes prevent IC duty breaches, assist documenting IC procedures, and help avert the need for litigation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. M. Stalmeier ◽  
M. S. Roosmalen ◽  
L. C. G. Josette Verhoef ◽  
E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers ◽  
J. C. Oosterwijk ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley M. Glynn ◽  
Lisa Dixon ◽  
Amy Cohen ◽  
Amy Drapalski ◽  
Deborah Medoff ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document