Effect of Adenosine and Histamine Receptor Stimulation on Canine Histamine Release to Pentagastrin

Digestion ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.A. Payne ◽  
J.G. Gerber
1984 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lennon ◽  
T.M. Feeley ◽  
A.S. Clanachan ◽  
G.W. Scott

Author(s):  
Monika Wolak ◽  
Ewa Bojanowska ◽  
Teresa Staszewska ◽  
Lucyna Piera ◽  
Jacek Szymański ◽  
...  

AbstractThe inflammatory reaction influences the deposition of collagen within wound granulation tissue. The aim of the present study is to determine whether histamine acting directly on myofibroblasts derived from wound granulation tissue may influence collagen deposition. It also identifies the histamine receptor involved in this process. The experiments were carried out on cells isolated from the granulation tissue of a wound model (a polypropylene net inserted subcutaneously to rats) or intact rat skin. Collagen content was measured following the addition of different concentrations of histamine and treatment with histamine receptor antagonists (ketotifen – H1 inhibitor, ranitidine – H2 inhibitor) and a histamine receptor H1 agonist (2-pyridylethylamine dihydrochloride).The cells were identified as myofibroblasts: alpha-smooth muscle actin, vimentin, and desmin positive in all experimental conditions. Histamine increased the collagen level within both cell cultures, i.e., those isolated from granulation tissue or intact skin. It did not, however, influence the expression of either the collagen type I or III genes within the cultured myofibroblasts. Histamine activity was reduced by ketotifen (the H1 receptor inhibitor) and increased by the H1 receptor agonist, as demonstrated by changes in the levels of collagen in the myofibroblast culture. Histamine increased collagen content within the cultures, acting directly on myofibroblasts via H1 receptor stimulation.


1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Polanin ◽  
John H. McNeill

The effects of selective histamine receptor analogs were studied in electrically paced rabbit left atria. Atrial tension was increased by histamine (an H1 and H2 agonist), 4-methylhistamine and impromidine (H2 agonists), and 2-pyridylethylamine (PEA) (an H1 agonist). The responses to histamine and impromidine were not altered by propranolol (1 × 10−7 M) or reserpine pretreatment. However, the responses to 4-methylhistamine and PEA were significantly decreased upon pretreatment with propranolol or reserpine. Promethazine pretreatment (H1 receptor blockade) antagonized the inotropic effects of histamine and PEA but had no effect on the responses to 4-methylhistamine or impromidine. Cimetidine pretreatment (H2 receptor antagonism) competitively blocked the positive inotropic effects of histamine, 4-methylhistamine, and impromidine. These results suggest that the left atrial inotropic response is mediated through H1 and H2 receptor stimulation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 557 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 236-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norihito Hiraga ◽  
Naoto Adachi ◽  
Keyue Liu ◽  
Takumi Nagaro ◽  
Tatsuru Arai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document