Significance of Subcategory Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Showing Both Cytologic and Architectural Atypia in Thyroid Aspiration Cytology

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 370-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Yang Jung ◽  
Sejin Jung ◽  
Hyun-Woo Lee ◽  
Young Lyun Oh
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Follicular Variant ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objective: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology is now widely used as the standard reporting system for fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Recently, several studies have attempted to subcategorize the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) category. We aimed to analyze the significance of a subcategory of AUS/FLUS showing both cytologic and architectural atypia (AUS/FLUS-C&A). Study Design: From April 2011 to May 2014, 18,091 patients underwent FNAC at Samsung Medical Center. For those patients we analyzed the clinical significance of the subcategory AUS/FLUS-C&A. Results: One hundred and sixty-three patients were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS-C&A. Of 71 cases with subsequent histologic confirmation, 47 (66.2%) were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Of the 47 PTC cases, 32 (68.1%) were follicular variant-PTC. A significant difference in the PTC rate (58.3 vs. 82.6%) and PTC size (average: 1.8 and 0.9 cm) was noted between circumscribed lesions and infiltrative lesions on ultrasonography. Conclusion: We demonstrated that the subcategory of AUS/FLUS-C&A has considerable clinical implications and one should be aware of the cytological and ultrasonographic features.

scholarly journals Reporting of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology with the use of the Bethesda System (TBS) of 150 cases

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3586
Author(s):  
Mandakini M. Patel ◽  
Mubim I. Patel ◽  
Bhavna G. Gamit ◽  
Sharmistha M. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Swelling ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is very simple, rapid, cost effective diagnostic test to evaluate thyroid swelling. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology gives guidelines which remains the same while reporting the thyroid FNAC. There are six diagnostic categories of lesions: (I) Non-diagnostic/Unsatisfactory, (II) Benign, (III) Atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AFLUS), (IV) Suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN), (V) Suspicious for malignancy (SM), (VI) Malignant.Methods: The study was carried out in Department of Pathology, Government Medical College affiliated with a Government hospital, Gujarat. It includes 150 patients, coming to the outpatient departments with a complaint of thyroid swelling from January 2017 to December 2017. The patients age ranges from 7 years to 75 years (Male-20, Female-130). The procedure was done with the patient in a supine position without a pillow. Patients were instructed not to speak or swallow during the procedure to avoid movement of the gland. The reporting was done with the current Bethesda nomenclature.Results: There were 150 cases of thyroid FNAC, 3 cases (2 %) were non-diagnostic (TBS-I), 133 cases (88.7 %) were benign (TBS-II), 6 cases (4 %) were atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AFLUS) (TBS-III), 5 cases (3.4 %) were suspicious for follicular neoplasm (TBS-IV), 2 cases (1.3 %) were suspicious for malignancy (TBS-V), and 1 case (0.6 %) was malignancy (TBS-VI).Conclusions: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system for reporting thyroid cytopathology, improving communication between cyto-pathologists and clinicians, inter-laboratory agreement, leading to more consistent management approaches. 

scholarly journals Malignancy Rate in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. e221-e226
Author(s):  
Hamdan Ahmed Pasha ◽  
Rahim Dhanani ◽  
Ainulakbar Mughal ◽  
Kaleem S. Ahmed ◽  
Anwar Suhail
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Follicular Carcinoma ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Abstract Introduction Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is one of the six diagnostic categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. The prevalence of malignancy among Bethesda category III cytology is variable, ranging from 5% to 37% in the literature. Objective To determine the rate of malignancy in thyroid nodules reported as Bethesda category III. Methods A total of 495 patients underwent surgical intervention for thyroid nodules from January 2015 to December 2017. The present study included 81 cases reported as Bethesda category III, and their medical records were reviewed. Results Out of 495 fine-needle aspiration cytology samples, 81 (16.4%) samples were labeled as AUS/FLUS. Among these 81 patients, the mean age was 43.0 years (± 13.9), with only 11 (14%) patients older than 55 years of age. Most of our patients were female (n = 69; 85.2%), and the rest were male. The rate of malignancy based on the final histology was of 33.3% (n = 27). The majority were 17 cases (21%) of papillary carcinoma, followed by follicular carcinoma (n = 6) (7.4%). Conclusion The risk of malignancy can be higher than it is commonly believed, and guidelines should be based on the data from the institutions themselves for a better assessment of the outcomes.

scholarly journals The Bethesda system for reporting of thyroid cytopathology and its category wise management

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2228
Author(s):  
Varun Gupta ◽  
Pooja Singh
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Thyroid Cytology ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Background: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid is a rapid diagnostic test for thyroid nodules. The Bethesda system classifies thyroid FNAC into six categories. Each category is linked to a malignancy risk and has recommended clinical management. The aim of this study was to analyze the thyroid cytology smears by Bethesda system and to assess the frequency of various categories and to correlate it previous published studies. Category wise management is also discussed in detail.Methods: A total of 388 thyroid FNAC samples were examined from January 2017 to June 2018 in the Department of Pathology, in Medanta- The Medicity Gurugram.Results: A total of 388 cases were reported according to Bethesda system of reporting. Categories were as follows: I (14.69%), II (61.85%), III (11.34%), IV (2.57%), V (2.660%), VI (4.91%) nodules.Conclusions: The Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology proved to be an excellent reporting system and it puts clinician and the cytopathologist on the same page and easier to communicate regarding diagnosis.

scholarly journals Implementation of Bethesda system in thyroid aspirate: A cyto-histopathological correlation study

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 902-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
PK Choudhary ◽  
N Nepal ◽  
N Mainali ◽  
B Meenakshi
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Background: Thyroid lump is a common clinical problem in Nepal. The risk of malignancy has to be judged prior to surgery for which fine needle aspiration cytology is widely used. To bring the uniform reporting of thyroid aspirates, the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) was introduced in 2007. This study was done to evaluate the various cytomorphological patterns of thyroid aspirate and to correlate the Bethesda system with final histopathology report.Materials and Methods: Fine needle aspiration were performed and were evaluated as per TBSRTC criteria. Fine needle aspiration cytology report were compared with biopsy specimen whenever possible.   Result: A total of 386 cases were studied. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy of TBSRTC were 75.2%, 98.2%, 90.0%, 94.7% and 94.03% respectively. Conclusion: Use of TBSRTC in reporting thyroid cytopathology has a greater accuracy; however, benign cases need regular follow up as there are false negative cases.

scholarly journals Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) for Fine Needle Aspiration of Thyroid: Is It Helpful?

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ahmed K. Aly ◽  
Mahmoud A. Ali ◽  
Apoorva Sharma ◽  
Michael A. Gubbels ◽  
Xing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Site Evaluation ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System

Introduction: Thyroid nodules are very common. Many are detected incidentally due to increased head and neck imaging. The majority are benign; however, malignancy can’t be excluded in many cases and tissue sampling is needed. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration is an easy and effective way to sample g thyroid nodules. Inadequate sampling was reported in 10-40% of the cases. Rapid On-site Evaluation (ROSE) was proposed to assess obtained sample for adequacy. The aim of this study is to identify the benefit of applying ROSE with US-FNA of thyroid nodules within our institution. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent FNA for thyroid nodules with ROSE availability documented in their procedure note between January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively included. All procedures were done by experienced radiologists. Aspirated material was Diff Quik stained for immediate evaluation. The final cytological diagnosis and specimen adequacy was based on The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Specimen adequacy was compared between ROSE and non-ROSE groups. Results: 442 thyroid nodules were biopsied. ROSE was available for 65 nodules. Non-diagnostic rate with ROSE was 10.8% compared to 13.8% without ROSE with the difference being statistically insignificant. ROSE availability improved sample adequacy of nodules less than 3 cm with statistically significant difference of 100.0% with ROSE vs. 87% without ROSE. Conclusion: The current study does not justify the routine use of ROSE. However, ROSE availability is beneficial with smaller sized thyroid nodules and less experienced radiologists performing the procedure. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0301-1 Full Text: PDF

scholarly journals The spectrum of thyroid lesions on fine needle aspiration cytology

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 630
Author(s):  
Yashika P. Jaiswal ◽  
Sanjay Chawhan
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Thyroid Lesions

Background: Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) of thyroid gland is the most common preoperative investigation for diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Though various tests like thyroid profile, ultrasonography and radionuclide scan are available, they are used as adjuvant diagnostic modalities. FNAC is simple, easy to perform, non-invasive and cost-effective procedure. Primary aim is to study the spectrum of various thyroid lesions on FNAC. Also, the study is aimed to categorise the thyroid lesions according to the Bethesda system for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (2017).Methods: This is a retrospective observational study carried out in the pathology department at tertiary care academic institute for a period of three years. FNAC was done in a patient with thyroid swelling by non-aspiration technique. Slides were prepared, fixed in 95% ethyl alcohol and processed with routine stains.Results: Out of 210 cases, 150 cases (71.42%) were benign lesions, 15 cases (7.14%) were Follicular neoplasm/Suspicious for follicular neoplasm, 14(6.66%) cases were reported as Atypia of undetermined significance, 13 cases (6.19%) were Unsatisfactory/Nondiagnostic, 11 cases (5.2%) were malignant and 7 cases (3.3%) were suspicious for malignancy.Conclusions: FNAC is the most effective tool for the diagnosis of thyroid lesions. The Bethesda system is used to categorise the thyroid lesions and helps in better communication between clinicians and pathologists for the best surgical and medical management. The number of benign cases were higher and the number of cases in the category of suspicious for malignancy were lower with female preponderance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document