The Future of Cochlear Implant Design

Author(s):  
Alistair Mitchell-Innes ◽  
Shakeel R. Saeed ◽  
Richard Irving
1983 ◽  
Vol 405 (1 Cochlear Pros) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Y. S. Kiang ◽  
E. M. Keithley ◽  
M. C. Liberman

Author(s):  
Vedat Topsakal

This chapter discusses papers on cochlear implant design including the design of the studies (outcome measures, results, conclusions, and a critique).


1989 ◽  
Vol 98 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Miyamoto ◽  
Mary Joe Osberger ◽  
Wendy A. Myres ◽  
Amy J. Robbins ◽  
Kathy Kessler ◽  
...  

A speech perception hierarchy has been developed and applied to assess the influence of cochlear implants and tactile aids on the acquisition of auditory, speech, and language skills in deaf children. Encouraging improvements were noted with both types of sensory aids at the detection level. The House 3M and Nucleus cochlear implant designs appear to offer advantages over the Tactaid II in providing ancillary speech perception cues to deaf children. Preliminary observations suggest that the multichannel cochlear implant design may be superior to the single-channel coding scheme.


1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. M. Luxford ◽  
W. F. House

The cochlear implant is now available widely as a treatment alternative for carefully selected patients with profound sensorineural deafness for whom other treatments or prostheses have been unsuccessful. This paper discusses the surgical techniques for implantation of the House 3M cochlear implant. There have been no serious surgical complications and only a few postoperative problems that were remedied satisfactorily. The surgical procedure allows replacement of a failed device or upgrading of the device as improvements become available in the future.


Author(s):  
Serkan Kurt ◽  
Ahmet G Ozsonmez

In a typical cochlear implant design, the ambient sound is detected via a microphone and the transmission unit of the implant is placed at the back of the auricle. However, this design has several drawbacks. Firstly, the subject cannot bath or swim comfortably with the microphone unit on, and secondly having an external attached unit which may be visible is cosmetically disturbing. Herein, the idea is to explore obtaining the acoustic signals that would directly drive the cochlear nerves, without using a microphone, in which only the vibrations of the ossicles are employed. Thus, the natural filter caused by the anatomy of the ear may be maintained. The proposed method is to place or attach a micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) type of tiny and lightweight accelerometer to sense or detect the vibrations of ossicles, namely malleus, incus and stapes. A quick analysis or first-thought revealed that physically longer extension of the incus is the most suitable and/or convenient place to attach such a sensor. The model adopted has been optimized to match the amplitude and phase response of the human ear from a system analysis point of view. Some simulation experiments had been done to study and understand the possible loading effects of placing a sensor on the incus. Purpose of the simulations is testing the feasibility before the very difficult surgical procedures. Preliminary results indicate that placing a sensor of weight up to 36 mg does not seriously affect the amplitude and the phase response of the ear. This study is yet another example of how simulations of physiological systems can be advantageous and facilitating in the design of biomedical systems.


Author(s):  
Blake S. Wilson ◽  
Michael F. Dorman ◽  
René H. Gifford ◽  
David McAlpine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document