scholarly journals Extended Half-Life Factor VIII and Factor IX Preparations

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Graf
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S15-S20
Author(s):  
Jens Müller ◽  
Georg Goldmann ◽  
Natascha Marquardt ◽  
Bernd Pötzsch ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg

AbstractDue to structural differences between extended half-life (EHL) factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX products and equivalent plasma wild-type molecules used for assay calibration, reagent-dependent discrepancies during monitoring of FVIII- and FIX-replacement therapies with EHL products have been described. To assess the performance of available one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays on the Siemens Atellica COAG 360 analyzer, an in vitro study using spiked plasma samples was performed. The described results confirm previously described findings and allowed allocation of each EHL product to an appropriate assay. In addition, corresponding EHL product–specific analytes were defined within the order entry system of the University Hospital Bonn. The requirement of product-specific FVIII and FIX assays complicates patient monitoring and demonstrates the need for both continuous education and communication between treating physicians and the coagulation laboratory.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S111
Author(s):  
A Chhabra ◽  
D Spurden ◽  
BJ Tortella ◽  
PF Fogarty ◽  
A Pleil ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (05) ◽  
pp. 518-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Berntorp ◽  
Nadine Andersson

There are two main bioengineering approaches to extending the half-life of factor (F)VIII or FIX products used for hemophilia replacement therapy. These are fusion to Fc-immunoglobulin G (FVIII and FIX) or to albumin (FIX) or pegylation/glycopegylation (FVIII and FIX). Four FVIII and three FIX products are in clinical development or have recently been licensed in regions of the world. The reported half-life extension is approximately 1.5-fold for FVIII and 2.5-fold, or even longer, for FIX. Clinical trials have shown promising results with respect to extension of dose intervals and efficacy in the treatment and prevention of bleeding events. The role of these products in clinical practice has been discussed in terms of either improving convenience and adherence through prolongation of the interval between infusions or maintaining current intervals thereby increasing trough levels and the safety margin against bleeds. This review of extended half-life products addresses the possibilities and problems of their introduction in hemophilia treatment.


Author(s):  
T. Preijers ◽  
M. W. F. van Spengler ◽  
K. Meijer ◽  
K. Fijnvandraat ◽  
K. Fischer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder, caused by a factor IX (FIX) deficiency. Recently, FIX concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) have become available. Prophylactic dosing of EHL-FIX concentrates can be optimized by assessment of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. To determine these parameters, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) may be applied. The study aims to establish adequate LSSs for estimating individual PK parameters of EHL-FIX concentrates using in silico evaluation. Methods Monte Carlo simulations were performed to obtain FIX activity versus time profiles using published population PK models for N9-GP (Refixia), rFIXFc (Alprolix), and rIX-FP (Idelvion). Fourteen LSSs, containing three or four samples taken within 8 days after administration, were formulated. Bayesian analysis was applied to obtain estimates for clearance (CL), half-life (t1/2), time to 1% (Time1%), and calculated weekly dose (Dose1%). Bias and precision of these estimates were assessed to determine which LSS was adequate. Results For all PK parameters of N9-GP, rFIXFc and rIX-FP bias was generally acceptable (range: −5% to 5%). For N9-GP, precision of all parameters for all LSSs was acceptable (< 25%). For rFIXFc, precision was acceptable for CL and Time1%, except for t1/2 (range: 27.1% to 44.7%) and Dose1% (range: 12% to 29.4%). For rIX-FP, all LSSs showed acceptable bias and precision, except for Dose1% using LSS with the last sample taken on day 3 (LSS 6 and 10). Conclusion Best performing LSSs were LSS with samples taken at days 1, 5, 7, and 8 (N9-GP and rFIXFc) and at days 1, 4, 6, and 8 (rIX-FP), respectively.


Haemophilia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. e280-e283
Author(s):  
I. C. L. Kremer Hovinga ◽  
R. E. G. Schutgens ◽  
P. R. van der Valk ◽  
L. F. D. van Vulpen ◽  
E. P. Mauser-Bunschoten ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 169 (6) ◽  
pp. 768-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali J. Mahdi ◽  
Samya G. Obaji ◽  
Peter W. Collins

Haemophilia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. e552-e554 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Malec ◽  
J. Journeycake ◽  
M. V. Ragni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document