scholarly journals An Update on Regional Nodal Irradiation: Indication, Target Volume Delineation, and Radiotherapy Techniques

Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-135
Author(s):  
Marciana Nona Duma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Node ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Target Volume Delineation ◽  
Regional Nodal Irradiation ◽  
Volume Delineation ◽  
Radiotherapy Techniques

Background: Tremendous changes have occurred in the treatment of breast cancer. This paper reviews and unifies the available data on modern axillary management of breast cancer patients with focus on the target volume delineation for regional nodal irradiation according to the most important contouring guidelines, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group (RTOG). Summary: The use of extensive radiotherapy target volumes (level I, II, III, IV) is probably not necessary for all patients to reproduce the clinical benefit shown in the available randomized trials (EORTC, MA.20, AMAROS, Z0011). Nevertheless, given the results in the MA.20 trial, where the patients received more modern systemic therapies and high irradiation doses in the medial paraclavicular region (level IV) and level II, it can be justified to include these regions completely in selected high-risk patients. Key Messages: High-tangent irradiation results in a similar dose distribution in axillary levels I and II compared to the AMAROS treatment field design in some patients. This supports earlier assumptions that irradiation may have accounted for the good results after sentinel lymph node dissection alone in the Z0011 trial. The ESTRO and RTOG clinical target volume (CTV) definitions cover sufficiently the metastatic lymph node hotspots, with a better coverage for the ESTRO CTV. Further, contouring according to the ESTRO would spare a significantly larger part of the healthy lymphatic system, making it our preferred contouring atlas. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as deep inspiration breath hold, should be cautiously employed in patients treated according to the inclusion criteria of the Z0011 as it will result in a lower dose to the axillary levels.

scholarly journals Patterns of supraclavicular area failure after mastectomy in breast cancer patients: implications for target volume delineation

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052095331
Author(s):  
Pei-cheng Lin ◽  
Xi-jin Lin ◽  
Jin-luan Li ◽  
Fei-fei Lin ◽  
Qing-yang Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Target Volume Delineation ◽  
Volume Delineation ◽  
Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes ◽  
Level I ◽  
Metastatic Involvement ◽  
Medial Supraclavicular

Purpose To characterize the pattern of post-mastectomy supraclavicular lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with breast cancer (BC) and to provide insights for individualized clinical target volume delineation for radiotherapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with BC who developed post-mastectomy regional LN metastases. The affected regional LNs were categorized as the ipsilateral medial supraclavicular LN area (IMSC-LN), ipsilateral lateral supraclavicular LN area (ILSC-LN), ipsilateral infraclavicular LN area (IIC-LN), and ≥2 groups in the ipsilateral clavicular LN area (MMIC-LN). Clinical characteristics were included in a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for clavicular LN metastases. Results The ILSC-LNs (68.2%) were the most common metastatic site. IMSC-LN metastases showed a significant association with estrogen-receptor (ER) negative status, left-sided BC, and positive axillary LNs. Tumor size ≥2.4 cm and Her2 type were predictors of ILSC-LN metastases. Additionally, tumor size ≥2.4 cm, and level I ipsilateral axillary metastases were associated with MMIC-LN metastasis. Conclusion ILSC-LN was the most frequently affected group of supraclavicular lymph nodes. ER-negative status, left-sided BC, tumor size, and positive ipsilateral axillary LNs are potentially associated with the pattern of supraclavicular LN metastatic involvement.

scholarly journals Voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold reduces the heart dose without compromising the target volume coverage during radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noora Al-Hammadi ◽  
Palmira Caparrotti ◽  
Carole Naim ◽  
Jillian Hayes ◽  
Katherine Rebecca Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold ◽  
Cardiac Dose

Abstract Background During radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer, parts of the heart are irradiated, which may lead to late toxicity. We report on the experience of single institution with cardiac-sparing radiotherapy using voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (V-DIBH) and compare its dosimetric outcome with free breathing (FB) technique. Patients and methods Left-sided breast cancer patients, treated at our department with postoperative radiotherapy of breast/chest wall +/– regional lymph nodes between May 2015 and January 2017, were considered for inclusion. FB-computed tomography (CT) was obtained and dose-planning performed. Cases with cardiac V25Gy ≥ 5% or risk factors for heart disease were coached for V-DIBH. Compliant patients were included. They underwent additional CT in V-DIBH for planning, followed by V-DIBH radiotherapy. Dose volume histogram parameters for heart, lung and optimized planning target volume (OPTV) were compared between FB and BH. Treatment setup shifts and systematic and random errors for V-DIBH technique were compared with FB historic control. Results Sixty-three patients were considered for V-DIBH. Nine (14.3%) were non-compliant at coaching, leaving 54 cases for analysis. When compared with FB, V-DIBH resulted in a significant reduction of mean cardiac dose from 6.1 +/– 2.5 to 3.2 +/– 1.4 Gy (p < 0.001), maximum cardiac dose from 51.1 +/– 1.4 to 48.5 +/– 6.8 Gy (p = 0.005) and cardiac V25Gy from 8.5 +/– 4.2 to 3.2 +/– 2.5% (p < 0.001). Heart volumes receiving low (10–20 Gy) and high (30–50 Gy) doses were also significantly reduced. Mean dose to the left anterior coronary artery was 23.0 (+/– 6.7) Gy and 14.8 (+/– 7.6) Gy on FB and V-DIBH, respectively (p < 0.001). Differences between FB- and V-DIBH-derived mean lung dose (11.3 +/– 3.2 vs. 10.6 +/– 2.6 Gy), lung V20Gy (20.5 +/– 7 vs. 19.5 +/– 5.1 Gy) and V95% for the OPTV (95.6 +/– 4.1 vs. 95.2 +/– 6.3%) were non-significant. V-DIBH-derived mean shifts for initial patient setup were ≤ 2.7 mm. Random and systematic errors were ≤ 2.1 mm. These results did not differ significantly from historic FB controls. Conclusions When compared with FB, V-DIBH demonstrated high setup accuracy and enabled significant reduction of cardiac doses without compromising the target volume coverage. Differences in lung doses were non-significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document