Secondary Immune Thrombocytopenia in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Discussion of the Literature

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome of solid tumor malignancies. In previously described cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) associated with secondary ITP, treatment has consisted of nephrectomy, splenectomy, and corticosteroids. Here, we describe a case of metastatic RCC presenting with a right ventricular mass and subsequent development of secondary ITP. The clinical course was complicated by recurrent severe thrombocytopenia despite treatment with corticosteroids, rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists, precluding cancer-directed therapy and anticoagulation. Further study is needed to determine the optimal management strategy for malignancy-associated ITP.

Download Full-text

Interleukin-4 Promoter Polymorphisms: A Genetic Prognostic Factor for Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.07.8154 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (7) ◽

pp. 845-851 ◽

Cited By ~ 33

Author(s):

Thomas Kleinrath ◽

Christoph Gassner ◽

Peter Lackner ◽

Martin Thurnher ◽

Reinhold Ramoner

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Clinical Course ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Interleukin 4 ◽

Promoter Polymorphisms ◽

Cox Regression Analysis ◽

Metastatic Rcc

Purpose Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is considered a cytokine-responsive tumor. The clinical course of a patient may thus be influenced by the patient's capacity to produce distinct cytokines. Therefore, cytokine gene polymorphisms in RCC patients were analyzed to determine haplotype combinations with prognostic significance. Patients and Methods A selection of 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms within the promoter regions of 13 cytokine genes were analyzed in a cross-sectional single-center study of 80 metastatic RCC patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses and the Cox forward-stepwise regression model were chosen to assess genetic risk factors. Results Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed by a bootstrap technique identified the heterozygous IL4 genotype −589T−33T/−589C−33C as an independent prognostic risk factor (risk ratio, 3.1; P < .01; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.9; adjusted for age, sex, and nuclear grading) in metastatic RCC patients. IL4 haplotype −589T−33T and −589C−33C were found with a frequency of 0.069 and 0.925, respectively, which represents a two-fold decrease of IL4 haplotype −589T−33T (P < .01) and an increase of IL4 haplotype −589C−33C frequency (P < .05) in metastatic RCC compared with other white reference study populations. The median overall survival was decreased 3.5-fold (P < .05) in heterozygote patients carrying IL4 haplotype −589T−33T and −589C−33C (3.78 months) compared with patients homozygote for IL4 haplotype −589C−33C (13.44 months). In addition, a linkage disequilibrium between the IL4 gene and the KIF3A gene was detected. Conclusion Our findings indicate that IL4 promoter variants influence prognosis in patients with metastatic RCC and suggest that genetically determined interleukin-4 (IL-4) production affects the clinical course of the disease possibly through regulation of immune surveillance.

Download Full-text

MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: from the Early Descriptions to the Current Knowledge

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers11081110 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (8) ◽

pp. 1110 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Anna Caliò ◽

Diego Segala ◽

Enrico Munari ◽

Matteo Brunelli ◽

Guido Martignoni

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Renal Cell ◽

Clinical Course ◽

Current Knowledge ◽

Wide Spectrum ◽

Cathepsin K ◽

World Health ◽

Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma ◽

Immunohistochemical Markers

The new category of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma has been included into the World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 2016. The MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma comprises Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma harboring TFE3 gene fusions and t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma harboring TFEB gene fusion. At the beginning, they were recognized in childhood; nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that these neoplasms can occur in adults as well. In the nineties, among Xp11 renal cell carcinoma, ASPL, PRCC, and SFPQ (PSF) were the first genes recognized as partners in TFE3 rearrangement. Recently, many other genes have been identified, and a wide spectrum of morphologies has been described. For this reason, the diagnosis may be challenging based on the histology, and the differential diagnosis includes the most common renal cell neoplasms and pure epithelioid PEComa/epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney. During the last decades, many efforts have been made to identify immunohistochemical markers to reach the right diagnosis. To date, staining for PAX8, cathepsin K, and melanogenesis markers are the most useful identifiers. However, the diagnosis requires the demonstration of the chromosomal rearrangement, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered the gold standard. The outcome of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma is highly variable, with some patients surviving decades with indolent disease and others dying rapidly of progressive disease. Despite most instances of t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma having an indolent clinical course, a few published cases demonstrate aggressive behavior. Recently, renal cell carcinomas with TFEB amplification have been described in connection with t(6;11) renal cell carcinoma. Those tumors appear to be associated with a more aggressive clinical course. For the aggressive cases of MiT family translocation carcinoma, the optimal therapy remains to be determined; however, new target therapies seem to be promising, and the search for predictive markers is mandatory.

Download Full-text