Practice Guidelines of the Central European Hepatologic Collaboration (CEHC) on the Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Invasive Procedures

Background: Second-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are emerging as the new standard for managing thrombocytopenia (TCP) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs) undergoing scheduled procedures. However, practical guidance for their routine use in CLD patients undergoing specific invasive procedures is lacking. Methods: These practice guidelines were developed by the Initiative Group for Central European Hepatologic Collaboration (CEHC), composed of nine hepatologist/gastroenterologist experts from Central Europe. Using an adapted Delphi process, the CEHC group selected ten invasive procedures most relevant to the hepatology/gastroenterology setting in the region. Consensus recommendations for each invasive procedure are reported as a final percentage of expert panel responses. Results: A consensus was agreed that TPO-RAs should be considered for raising platelet count in CLD patients undergoing scheduled abdominal surgery, high-bleeding risk dentistry, endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic variceal ligation, liver biopsy, liver surgery, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation, but it was also agreed that they are less beneficial or not necessary for endoscopy without intervention and paracentesis. Conclusions: Using a modified Delphi method, experts reached an agreement for TCP management in CLD patients undergoing ten invasive procedures. These practice guidelines may help with decision making and patient management in areas where clinical evidence is absent or limited.

Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) with Eltrombopag - Results of the 4 th Interim Analysis of the German Non-Interventional Trial RISA

Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder with increased platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Patients present with bleeding complications of various severity. Another common symptom of ITP is fatigue, which can severely affect patient's quality of life. Eltrombopag (EPAG) is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, which is proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of ITP. In Europe, it is approved for the therapy of patients who were diagnosed with ITP at least 6 months ago and who have not responded to other treatments. Here we present data from the 4 th interim analysis of the RISA study. Methods: RISA is a prospective multicenter non-interventional trial in Germany. It was launched in December 2015, and it will be continued until December 2023. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, adults with persisting or chronic pITP (primary ITP) have been enrolled. Patients with pre-treatment could only be included if it was terminated 4 weeks prior to the patient's consent to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria comprised pregnancy, hepatitis C infection and severe aplastic anaemia. Dosage of EPAG and treatment of patients follows the SmPC and the routine of treating physicians. According to the study protocol, patient questionnaires must be completed at 0,1,3,6,9,12,18 and 24 months. Fatigue is assessed using the FACIT-F score, which includes a score range from 0 to 52, with score values <30 indicating severe fatigue. Statistical elaboration is predominantly descriptive. Calculations of confidence intervals and significance values are performed only for explorative purposes. Results: Data cutoff for this 4 th interim analysis was 23.02.2021. 275 patients were enrolled. 261 of them received at least one dose of EPAG and completed one post baseline assessment. Mean duration of participation was 5.2 years. Mean±SD age was 62.7±17.6 years. 54.8% of the patients were female. Median (range) duration of ITP at baseline was 5.3 (0.0-44.9) years. Comorbidity was present in 80.5% of all patients. 79 (28.7%) patients completed all scheduled visits before data cutoff. Median treatment duration was 395.0 days. Treatment with EPAG was carried out at a median dosage of 50 mg daily. In 255 patients, baseline platelet counts were available. The proportion of patients with a platelet count ≥50x10 9/L was 30.6% at baseline. With EPAG treatment, it increased to 75.4% within the first month (N=224) and to 89.0% within 24 months (N=73) from baseline. 12.6% of the patients who completed at least one assessment visit after baseline were pre-treated with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim. Within this subgroup as well, platelet counts responded well to EPAG treatment. In 35.6% of patients, at least one bleeding event had occurred in the 12 months prior to baseline. During EPAG therapy, the incidence of bleeding events per patient year was reduced from 1.40 before baseline to 0.60 and 0.13 within the first and second treatment year respectively. This corresponds to a relative reduction in bleeding events of 57% and 91% respectively. Over the entire two years treatment period, the average incidence of bleeding events per patient year accounted for 0.44, which is 69% below the incidence at baseline. Bleeding events were mostly of low severity. (Tab.) Median FACIT-F score was 37.0 at baseline (N=202; mean 36.0±11.0) and 42.5 after 24 months (N=48; mean 38.1±12.1). This difference was not statistically significant. According to exploratory calculations, severity of fatigue was not correlated to platelet count, hemoglobin concentration or incidence of bleeding events. Discussion: In line with previously published randomized controlled trials (Birocchi et al. Platelets 2021), this non-interventional study confirmed the effectiveness of EPAG in adults with persistent or chronic ITP in a routine care setting. During treatment with EPAG, the prevalence and severity of thrombocytopenia, as well as the incidence of bleeding events, decreased. We could also confirm that fatigue is a significant issue in patients with ITP. A FACIT-F score of 37.0 is comparable to average score values in cancer patients (Montan et al. Value Health 2018). Under treatment with EPAG, we observed a decrease in fatigue that was clinically relevant but not statistically significant. Further research is needed to explore possible additional effects of EPAG, for example on fatigue. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Meyer: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stauch: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Willy: Novartis Pharma: Current Employment.

Association between Megakaryocyte Abnormalities on Bone Marrow Smear and Response to Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Adult Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease due to peripheral destruction but also impaired central production of platelets. Autoimmune reaction directed against megakaryocytes (MKs) has been described, and may explain morphological abnormalities of MKs observed in some patients with primary ITP. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are indicated as second-line treatments for ITP, but no predictive factors of response used in clinical routine practice has been demonstrated. The utility of systematic bone marrow smears (BMS) at ITP diagnosis is discussed. Howerer, it is usually recommended before second-line treatments. Two studies have suggested an association between MK abnormalities and response to corticosteroids in primary ITP, but none have investigated this association for TPO-RAs. This study aimed to investigate the association between MK abnormalities and response to TPO-RAs in adult patients with primary ITP. Methods: The source of population was the CARMEN registry. The CARMEN (Cytopénies Auto-immunes: Registre Midi-PyréneEN) registry is aimed at the prospective follow-up of all incident ITP adults in the French Midi-Pyrénées region (South-West of France, 3 million inhabitants) since June 2013. Each investigator follows all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with incident ITP in routine visit or hospital stay. ITP was defined by international definition (platelet count <100 x 10 9/L and exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia). The study population consisted in all patients included in the CARMEN registry between June 2013 and March 2018 with primary ITP, treated by TPO-RA and with a BMS before initiating TPO-RA. We excluded the patients with a number of MKs <10 MK on the BMS. Morphological abnormalities were established based on literature and defined by consensus among 3 expert cytologists (AR, JBR and VDM). All MKs present on each smear were analyzed. MKs were categorized by the presence of dysplasia (monolobed MK and/or separated nuclei and/or microMKs), and according to their stage of maturation (basophilic, granular and thrombocytogenic). All patients' medical charts were reviewed by two experts in ITP (OW and GM) to determine the response to TPO-RAs. Response was defined by a platelet count between 30 and 100 G/L with at least a doubling of basal platelet count according to the international definition. In case of subsequent exposure to both TPORAs in a single patient, response was defined by response to at least one TPO-RA in the main analysis. We performed a subgroup analysis by TPORAs. Results: During the study period, 451 patients with incident ITP were included in CARMEN-registry. Among them, 105 had been treated by TPO-RAs, including 65 with BMS before the exposure to TPORA. We then excluded 20 patients with secondary ITP and 7 with less than 10 MKs on the BMS. We finally included 38 patients in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 71 years (interquartile range - IQR: 31 - 94) and 34.2% were women. Thirty-three patients were treated with eltrombopag, 17 with romiplostim including 13 who were exposed to both TPORAs. Thirty-four (89.4%) achieved response. The median number of MKs analyzed per patient was 137 (IQR: 50 - 265). All results are presented in Table 1. In the main analysis, there was no significant difference in the median percentage of dysplastic MKs in responders (4.0%, 95% confidence interval - CI: 2.3 - 6.4) and non-responders (4.5%, 95% CI: 0.7 - 7.1). There was a trend for a higher proportion of granular MKs (4.5%, 95% CI: 3 - 6) and basophilic MKs (30.1%, 95% CI: 21.9 - 39.1) in non-responders comparing to responders (granular: 2.0%, 95% CI: 0 - 4.1; basophilic: 21.3%, 95% CI: 11.4 - 40.7). Results were similar in the subgroup of patients treated with eltrombopag (data not shown; the low number of patients treated with romiplostim precluded any analysis). Conclusion: In this study, neither MK abnormalities nor the pattern of MK maturation stages were significantly associated with response to TPO-RAs. These results do not support a systematic bone marrow smear in patients with primary ITP to look for morphological predictive factors of response to TPO-RA. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Comont: AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Moulis: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Splenectomy for Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Revisited at the Era of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists: New Insights for an Old Treatment

Introduction Although splenectomy is still considered as the most effective curative treatment for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), its use has significantly declined in the last decade, especially since the emergence of thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies 1-3. The main objective of our study was to evaluate if splenectomy was still as effective in the modern era, particularly for patients who failed to respond to TPO-RAs and rituximab. One of the secondary objectives was to assess, among patients who did not respond to or relapse after splenectomy, the pattern of response to subsequent intervention with treatments used before splenectomy and particularly TPO-RAs. Methods This multicentre retrospective observational study involved adults who underwent surgical splenectomy for primary ITP in France from 2011 (authorization of TPO-RAs in France) to 2020. To be included in the study, patients had to fulfil the following criteria : age ³18 years, primary ITP diagnosis defined according to the usual international criteria 2. Patients with abnormal spleen histology (other than reactional lymphoid hyperplasia, white-pulp hypoplasia or red pulp hyperplasia) or yet definite secondary ITP were excluded. Response was defined according to international criteria 4. Sustained response was defined as the absence of ITP relapse at last visit. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression procedures to calculates the odds ratio associated with a sustained response. Results In total,185 patients, 98 (53 %) women, with median age at splenectomy of 43.3 [interquartile range 27.6-64.3] years, were included in 18 French university and general hospitals from the French reference center network. Most of the patients were splenectomised at the chronic phase of ITP (n=150, 81.1%) and only two patients had undergone surgery within 3 months after ITP onset. Of note, 100 (54.1%) and 135 (73.0%) patients received TPO-RAs and/or rituximab prior to the splenectomy, respectively. The median time of follow-up after splenectomy was 39.2 months [16.5-63.0]. Overall, 144 (77.8%) of patients had an initial response and 23 patients (12.4%) relapsed during follow-up leading to an overall rate of sustained response of 65.4%, similar to the one observed in the pre-TPO-RA's era 1. Characteristics of patients according to the period during which occurred the splenectomy is available in Table 1. Among the 14 patients who failed to respond to both eltrombopag and romiplostim prior to splenectomy a sustained response after splenectomy was observed in 7 (50%). Among the 13 patients who had failed after both TPO-RAs and rituximab, we observed a sustained response in 6 (46%). In the multivariate analysis, an older age (60-75 years: OR 0,39 [0,17-0,86], p=0.02; >75 years: OR 0,28 [0,10-0,75], p=0.013) and a history of more than 4 treatment lines for ITP before splenectomy (OR 0.25 [0.08-0.66], p=0.010) were significantly associated with a lack of sustained response after splenectomy. TPO-RAs were used for 57/64 (89.1%) patients who failed to respond to splenectomy. Among them, 21 were treated with one TPO-RA (i.e. eltrombopag or romiplostim) which was previously used before splenectomy without any efficacy and a response was observed in 13 (62%) of them. Conclusions In conclusion, splenectomy seems to be still a relevant option for treating adult primary ITP not responding to TPO-RAs and rituximab. Patients who fail to respond or relapse after splenectomy should be re-challenged with TPO-RAs. 1. Kojouri, K., Vesely, S. K., Terrell, D. R. & George, J. N. Splenectomy for adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review to assess long-term 2. Provan, D. et al. Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 3.Neunert, C. et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 3, 3829-3866 (2019). 4. Rodeghiero, F. et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood 113, 2386-2393 (2009). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Terriou: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ebbo: Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Attendance Grant; Sobi: Other: Attendance Grant. Viallard: Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; LFB: Consultancy. Jeandel: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for congress; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Other: Support for congress; GSK: Other: Support for congress; Pharming: Other: support for congress. Michel: Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Rigel: Honoraria; UCB: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Argenx: Honoraria. Godeau: Grifols: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Comont: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding.