scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Tandem Hemodialysis and Selective Plasma Exchange in Pretransplant Desensitization of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ako Hanaoka ◽  
Toshihide Naganuma ◽  
Daijiro Kabata ◽  
Daichi Morii ◽  
Yoshiaki Takemoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Plasma Exchange ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Transmembrane Pressure ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Antibody Mediated Rejection ◽  
Tandem Therapy ◽  
Internal Pressures ◽  
Over Time

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> In patients requiring both hemodialysis (HD) and apheresis, the 2 treatments can be performed simultaneously. At our hospital, selective plasma exchange (SePE) is often performed along with HD for removal of isoagglutinins before ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation. The 2 treatments can be completed within the HD schedule, which allows the treatment time to be shortened. This approach is also less stressful for patients because fewer punctures are required. In this study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of tandem HD and SePE. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 58 SePE sessions in 30 ABOi kidney transplant recipients were investigated. The SePE circuit was connected in parallel with the HD circuit, and tandem HD and SePE therapy was performed using filtration methods. The SePE sessions were divided into 2 groups: those with SePE monotherapy (group S, <i>n</i> = 20) and those with tandem therapy (group T, <i>n</i> = 38). Changes in transmembrane pressure (TMP), arterial pressure (AP), venous pressure (VP), and decrease in isoagglutinin titers over time were compared between the groups with adjustment for background data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The internal pressures (AP and VP) were higher in group T, and there were significant differences in changes of TMP and AP over time between groups T and S. Membrane exchange was required in 1 case in group T due to coagulation. There was a more significant decrease of immunoglobulin G isoagglutinin titers in group T compared to group S. No case had antibody-mediated rejection after transplantation. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> In HD/SePE tandem therapy, internal pressures were higher and TMP and AP tended to increase more compared to SePE monotherapy, but we were able to perform the 2 treatments without any functional problems. Tandem therapy was also effective in decreasing isoagglutinin titers, which suggests that this may be a beneficial treatment modality as apheresis before ABOi kidney transplantation.

Acute Rejection Following Kidney Transplantation: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3468-3496
Author(s):  
Emilio Rodrigo ◽  
Marcio F. Chedid ◽  
David San Segundo ◽  
Juan C.R. San Millán ◽  
Marcos López-Hoyos
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rejection Rate ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Antibody Mediated Rejection ◽  
Cellular Rejection

: Although acute renal graft rejection rate has declined in the last years, and because an adequate therapy can improve graft outcome, its therapy remains as one of the most significant challenges for pharmacists and physicians taking care of transplant patients. Due to the lack of evidence highlighted by the available metaanalyses, we performed a narrative review focused on the basic mechanisms and current and future therapies of acute rejection in kidney transplantation. : According to Kidney Disease/Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, both clinical and subclinical acute rejection episodes should be treated. Usually, high dose steroids and basal immunosuppression optimization are the first line of therapy in treating acute cellular rejection. Rabbit antithymocytic polyclonal globulins are used as rescue therapy for recurrent or steroid-resistant cellular rejection episodes. Current standard-of-care (SOC) therapy for acute antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is the combination of plasma exchange with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Since a significant rate of AbMR does not respond to SOC, different studies have analyzed the role of new drugs such as Rituximab, Bortezomib, Eculizumab and C1 inhibitors. Lack of randomized controlled trials and heterogenicity among performed studies limit obtaining definite conclusions. Data about new direct and indirect B cell and plasma cell depleting agents, proximal and terminal complement blockers, IL-6/IL-6R pathway inhibitors and antibody removal agents, among other promising drugs, are reviewed.

scholarly journals B-cell activating factor BAFF as a novel alert marker for the immunological risk stratification after kidney transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Margarete Schuster ◽  
N. Miesgang ◽  
L. Steines ◽  
C. Bach ◽  
B. Banas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Antibody Mediated Rejection ◽  
B Cell Activating Factor ◽  
Medium Risk ◽  
Patients At Risk

AbstractThe B cell activating factor BAFF has gained importance in the context of kidney transplantation due to its role in B cell survival. Studies have shown that BAFF correlates with an increased incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and the development of donor-specific antibodies. In this study, we analyzed a defined cohort of kidney transplant recipients who were treated with standardized immunosuppressive regimens according to their immunological risk profile. The aim was to add BAFF as an awareness marker in the course after transplantation to consider patient’s individual immunological risk profile. Included patients were transplanted between 2016 and 2018. Baseline data, graft function, the occurrence of rejection episodes, signs of microvascular infiltration, and DSA kinetics were recorded over 3 years. BAFF levels were determined 14 d, 3 and 12 months post transplantation. Although no difference in graft function could be observed, medium-risk patients showed a clear dynamic in their BAFF levels with low levels shortly after transplantation and an increase in values of 123% over the course of 1 year. Patients with high BAFF values were more susceptible to rejection, especially antibody-mediated rejection and displayed intensified microvascular inflammation; the combination of high BAFF + DSA puts patients at risk. The changing BAFF kinetics of the medium risk group as well as the increased occurrence of rejections at high BAFF values enables BAFF to be seen as an awareness factor. To compensate the changing immunological risk, a switch from a weaker induction therapy to an intensified maintenance therapy is required.

scholarly journals Case report: de novo ANCA-associated vasculitis after kidney transplantation treated with rituximab and plasma exchange

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Sagmeister ◽  
Max Weiss ◽  
Peter Eichhorn ◽  
Antje Habicht ◽  
Rupert Habersetzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Plasma Exchange ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document