scholarly journals Adenoma Recurrence after Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection of Colorectal Flat Lesions: Applicability of the Sydney EMR Recurrence Tool in a Non-Tertiary Centre

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Maria Azevedo Silva ◽  
Carina Leal ◽  
André Ruge ◽  
Alexandra Fernandes ◽  
Liliana Eliseu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Argon Plasma Coagulation ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
Endoscopic Surveillance ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Adenoma Recurrence ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Flat Lesions

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the treatment of choice for non-invasive colorectal flat lesions. When endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) is performed, endoscopic surveillance is necessary due to the risk of recurrence. The Sydney EMR Recurrence Tool (SERT) is a 0–4 scale that classifies lesions according to size, occurrence of intraprocedural bleeding (IPB) and presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Our goal is to evaluate the applicability of SERT in predicting adenoma recurrence (AR) after EPMR. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective single-centre study with inclusion of lateral spreading lesions ≥20 mm, consecutively resected by EPMR from March 2010 to February 2018, with at least 1 endoscopic re-evaluation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 181 lesions were included, corresponding to 174 patients with a mean age of 68 years and male gender predominance (61%; <i>n</i> = 106). The most frequent location was the ascending colon (34%; <i>n</i> = 62). Lesions were assessed according to Paris Classification (PC): 0-IIa: 39% (<i>n</i> = 71); 0-IIb: 24% (<i>n</i> = 43); 0-IIa + Is: 23% (<i>n</i> = 42); 0-IIa + IIb: 6% (<i>n</i> = 11); 0-IIa + IIc: 2% (<i>n</i> = 3). The mean size of the lesions was 33 ± 11 mm, with 25 (14%) being ≥40 mm. IPB occurred in 9 cases (5%), and 44 lesions (24%) displayed HGD. Sixty-six lesions (36.5%) were classified as SMSA (size, morphology, site, and access score) level 4. Adjunctive therapy with argon plasma coagulation (APC) was used in 37% (<i>n</i> = 67) of cases. The 6-month AR rate was 16% (<i>n</i> = 29). According to SERT groups, the AR rate was: SERT 0: 12% (14/120); SERT 1: 17% (6/35); SERT 2: 25% (3/12); SERT 3: 30% (3/10); SERT 4: 75% (3/4). Two of the three SERT variables (size ≥40 mm and IPB) were associated with recurrence at 6 months (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). HGD and the remaining tested variables (age, gender, localization, accessibility, PC, use of APC/biopsy forceps and occurrence of delayed bleeding) were not associated with AR. SERT 0 lesions showed an inferior risk of 6-month AR (adjusted OR = 2.62; <i>p</i> = 0.035), with a negative predictive value of 88%. SMSA correlated with SERT (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and SMSA level 4 was associated with 6-month AR (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Lesions classified both as SERT 0 and SMSA level &#x3c;4 had the lowest 6-month recurrence rate (9.2%). The 24-month recurrence rate was 23% (<i>n</i> = 41). When applying the Kaplan-Meier method, cumulative recurrence was significantly lower in SERT 0 lesions (<i>p</i> = 0.006, log-rank test). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Resection of flat colorectal lesions by EPMR has a considerable risk of recurrence, mostly in SERT 1–4 lesions. SERT 0 lesions, especially with SMSA level &#x3c;4, show a lower risk of recurrent adenoma, which might allow longer intervals to first endoscopic surveillance in the future.

scholarly journals Adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection: propensity score analysis of old and new colonoscopes and Sydney recurrence tool implementation

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. E230-E241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Vinsard ◽  
Pujan Kandel ◽  
Lady Mejia Perez ◽  
Russell Bingham ◽  
Ryan Lennon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Argon Plasma Coagulation ◽  
Argon Plasma ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
Adenoma Recurrence ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence

Abstract Background and study aims Risk factors for colorectal adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) have been well documented. We assessed the efficacy of the newer 190 colonoscope versus the standard 180 colonoscope for complete resection of lateral spreading lesions. Patients and methods A single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent EMR with Olympus 180 or 190 colonoscopes from January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2016. We included patients with lesions ≥ 20 mm and surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) after index EMR. A propensity score approach with inverse probability weighting was used to control for potential confounders. A secondary aim was to identify risk factors for recurrence and assess the applicability of the Sydney EMR recurrence tool (SERT) by grading each lesion of our cohort and analyzing associations with recurrence. Results Two hundred ninety-one lesions met inclusion criteria for the study. Odds ratio (OR) for recurrence with the 190 colonoscope was 1.06 (P = .85). Adenoma size (P = .02) and use of argon plasma coagulation (APC; P < .001) were risk factors for recurrence. Lesions with SERT scores > 0 had a higher recurrence risk during follow-up (32 % vs 21 %; OR 1.71; P = .05). Lesions with SERT scores = 0 reached a plateau for recurrence at 12 and 18 months in Kaplan-Meier curves. Conclusions The use of 190 colonoscopes did not measurably affect adenoma recurrence at SC1. Recurrence was associated with adenoma size, complementary APC for resection, and SERT scores > 0. Lesions with SERT scores = 0 that remain negative for recurrence at 18 months may return to routine surveillance.

scholarly journals Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (> 20 mm) non pedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. E74-E81
Author(s):  
Saurabh Chandan ◽  
Antonio Facciorusso ◽  
Daryl Ramai ◽  
Smit Deliwala ◽  
Babu P. Mohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Effective Technique ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Adenoma Recurrence ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Soft Coagulation

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) > 20 mm in size can be challenging. Piecemeal EMR of these lesions results in high rates of adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) of post resection margins is a safe and effective technique to prevent adenoma recurrence. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this technique. Patients and methods Multiple databases were searched through April 2021 for studies that reported on outcomes of post EMR STSC for LSTs > 20 mm in size. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds of adenoma recurrence as well as pooled proportion of adverse events including intraprocedural and delayed bleeding as well as intraprocedural perforation events. Results Six studies including two randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies with 2122 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall pooled odds of adenoma recurrence at SC1 with post EMR STSC compared to no STSC was 0.27 (95 % 0.18–0.42; I2 = 0 %), P < 0.001. Pooled rate of adenoma recurrence at SC1 in post EMR STSC cohort was 6 %. Rates of intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding and intraprocedural perforation were 10.3 %, 6.5 % and 2 % respectively. Conclusions Our results show that thermal ablation of resection margins with STSC in LSTs > 20 mm is a safe and effective technique in reducing the incidence of adenoma recurrence.

scholarly journals Cap-fitted endoscopic mucosal resection of ≥ 20 mm colon flat lesions followed by argon plasma coagulation results in a low adenoma recurrence rate

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. E115-E121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gottumukkala S. Raju ◽  
Phillip Lum ◽  
Hamzah Abu-Sbeih ◽  
William A. Ross ◽  
Selvi Thirumurthi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Argon Plasma Coagulation ◽  
Argon Plasma ◽  
Colonic Polyps ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Plasma Coagulation ◽  
Adenoma Recurrence ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is increasingly used for the treatment of large colonic polyps (≥ 20 mm). A drawback of EMR is local adenoma recurrence. Therefore, we studied the impact of argon plasma coagulation (APC) of the EMR edge on local adenoma recurrence. Patients and methods This was a retrospective study of patients with laterally spreading tumors (LST) ≥ 20 mm, who underwent EMR from January 2009 to August 2018 and follow-up endoscopic assessment. A cap-fitted endoscope was used to assess completeness of resection by systematically inspecting the EMR defect for any macroscopic disease. This was followed by forced APC of the resection edge followed by clip closure of the defect. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed at 6 months after resection to detect recurrence. Results Two hundred forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Most were female (53 %) and white (80 %), with a Median age of 64 years. Median polyp size was 35 mm (interquartile range, 30–45 mm). Most polyps were located in the right colon (77 %) and were removed by piecemeal EMR (70 %). Eleven patients (5 %) had residual tumor at the resection site. Conclusions We observed low adenoma recurrence after argon plasma coagulation of the EMR edge with a cap fitted colonoscope in patients with LST ≥ 20 mm of the colon, which requires further validation in a randomized controlled study.

Endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrent gastric antral vascular ectasia

VASA ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsinelos ◽  
Chatzimavroudis ◽  
Katsinelos ◽  
Panagiotopoulou ◽  
Kotakidou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Argon Plasma Coagulation ◽  
Argon Plasma ◽  
Deficiency Anemia ◽  
Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Plasma Coagulation ◽  
Vascular Ectasia ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
First Case

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is an overt or occult source of gastrointestinal bleeding. Despite several therapeutic approaches have been successfully tested for preventing chronic bleeding, some patients present recurrence of GAVE lesions. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case, of a 86-year-old woman who presented severe iron-deficiency anemia due to GAVE and showed recurrence of GAVE lesion despite the intensive argon plasma coagulation treatment. We performed endoscopic mucosal resection of bleeding GAVE with resolution of anemia.

scholarly journals Clip placement to prevent delayed bleeding after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (CLIPPER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayla S. Turan ◽  
◽  
Leon M. G. Moons ◽  
Ramon-Michel Schreuder ◽  
Erik J. Schoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Colon Polyps ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Mucosal Resection

Abstract Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large colorectal polyps is in most cases the preferred treatment to prevent progression to colorectal carcinoma. The most common complication after EMR is delayed bleeding, occurring in 7% overall and in approximately 10% of polyps ≥ 2 cm in the proximal colon. Previous research has suggested that prophylactic clipping of the mucosal defect after EMR may reduce the incidence of delayed bleeding in polyps with a high bleeding risk. Methods The CLIPPER trial is a multicenter, parallel-group, single blinded, randomized controlled superiority study. A total of 356 patients undergoing EMR for large (≥ 2 cm) non-pedunculated polyps in the proximal colon will be included and randomized to the clip group or the control group. Prophylactic clipping will be performed in the intervention group to close the resection defect after the EMR with a distance of < 1 cm between the clips. Primary outcome is delayed bleeding within 30 days after EMR. Secondary outcomes are recurrent or residual polyps and clip artifacts during surveillance colonoscopy after 6 months, as well as cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping and severity of delayed bleeding. Discussion The CLIPPER trial is a pragmatic study performed in the Netherlands and is powered to determine the real-time efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping after EMR of proximal colon polyps ≥ 2 cm in the Netherlands. This study will also generate new data on the achievability of complete closure and the effects of clip placement on scar surveillance after EMR, in order to further promote the debate on the role of prophylactic clipping in everyday clinical practice. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03309683. Registered on 13 October 2017. Start recruitment: 05 March 2018. Planned completion of recruitment: 31 August 2021.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document