scholarly journals Diversity of Endophytic Fungi Associated with Fruits and Leaves of Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Based on Its Ribosomal DNA Sequences

BIOTROPIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Mycologia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwan S. Ko ◽  
Soon G. Hong ◽  
Hack S. Jung

2000 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Nadler ◽  
Eric P. Hoberg ◽  
Deborah S. S. Hudspeth ◽  
Lora G. Rickard

Nematology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mullin ◽  
Timothy Harris ◽  
Thomas Powers

AbstractThe systematic position of Campydora Cobb, 1920, which possesses many unique morphological features, especially in pharyngeal structure and stomatal armature, has long been a matter of uncertainty with the 'position of the Campydorinae' (containing only Campydora) being questionable. A review of the morphology of C. demonstrans, the only nominal species of Campydora concluded that the species warranted placement as the sole member of a monotypic suborder, Campydorina, in the order Dorylaimida. Others placed Campydorina in the order Enoplida. We conducted phylogenetic analyses, using 18s small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences generated from a number of taxa in the subclasses Enoplia and Dorylaimia, to evaluate these competing hypotheses. Although precise taxonomic placement of the genus Campydora and the identity of its closest living relatives is in need of further investigation, our analyses, under maximum parsimony, distance, and maximum likelihood criteria, unambiguously indicate that Campydora shares a common, more recent, ancestry with genera such as Alaimus, Pontonema, Tripyla and Ironus (Enoplida), rather than with any members of Dorylaimida, Mononchida or Triplonchida.


1997 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. HAUBEN ◽  
L. VAUTERIN ◽  
J. SWINGS ◽  
E. R. B. MOORE

1993 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Hausner ◽  
J. Reid ◽  
G. R. Klassen

Analyses of partial rDNA sequences from both the small and large subunit genes of species of Ceratocystis s.l. support the contention that species that lack Chalara anamorphs, are resistant to cycloheximide, and have rhamnose in their cell walls should be assigned to Ophiostoma, whereas only species with Chalara anamorphs should be accommodated in Ceratocystis s.s. The data also show that Ceratocystiopsis is polyphyletic, and Sphaeronaemella fimicola appears to have little relation to either Ceratocystis or Ophiostoma. Key words: Ceratocystis, Ophiostoma, phylogeny, partial rDNA sequences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document