Tirofiban optimizes platelet inhibition for immediate percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk acute coronary syndromes

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. 648-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frieder Keck ◽  
Peter Staritz ◽  
Stephanie Lehrke ◽  
Hugo A. Katus ◽  
Evangelos Giannitsis ◽  
...  

SummaryIt was the aim of this study to compare the efficacy of early platelet inhibition by 600 mg clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) to a triple therapy including a glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor blocker. Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended for high-risk acute coronary syndromes. In this setting the efficacy of platelet inhibition is unknown. One hundred patients were randomized to receive ASA and 600 mg clopidogrel, or additional open-label tirofiban (bolus of 10 µg/kg body weight followed by continued infusion of 0.15 µg/kg body weight per minute) as soon as non-ST - segment elevation myocardial infarction was diagnosed. The primary endpoint was the reduction of infarct size determined by post-interventional increases of cardiac troponin T (cTnT). Secondary endpoints included platelet function measured by optical and impedance aggregometry using ADP (5 and 20 µM) and collagen (1 µg/ml) as platelet agonists. Tirofiban maximized platelet inhibition (p<0.0001) immediately and was associated with significantly lower post-interventional cTnT concentrations (p=0.0352). In the dual platelet inhibition arm, clopidogrel was not effective in 69% of patients at the time of coronary intervention, and still in 47%, if pre-treatment time was >120 minutes. The frequency of cardiovascular (death, myocardial infarction, revascularization) and bleeding events was comparable. Platelet aggregation is not adequately inhibited in cTnT - positive patients in the setting of immediate PCI with very short pre-treatment times. Only tirofiban provided consistent and effective inhibition of platelet aggregation at the time of immediate or very early invasive therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Grade Santos ◽  
A Briosa ◽  
A.R Pereira ◽  
A Marques ◽  
D Sebaiti ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The approach to Acute Coronary Syndromes is based on robust high quality evidence, currently systematized in European endorsed guidelines. However most trials that support such guidelines excluded or included a small percentage of the very elderly, namely nonagenarian patients, and the clinical decision in this age range is subjected to high interpersonal and inter-hospital variability. Purpose Our aim was to assess the approach to nonagenarian patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), in what regards the choice of percutaneous coronary intervention or conservative management and determine in-hospital and at 1 year outcomes. Methods We performed a 9 year retrospective analysis of all patients with age equal or greater than ninety (90) admitted with ACS in Portugal. Medical records were analysed for demographic, procedural data and outcomes. Results Seven hundred and fourteen (714) nonagenarian patients were admitted with ACS, which corresponded to 2.4% of the total cohort. The mean age was 92±2 with a female preponderance (58.7%). There was a high rate of cardiovascular risk factor with hypertension in 81.3%; Dyslipidemia in 46.1% Diabetes Mellitus in 23.4%; and other comorbidities with 21% of prior ACS, 14.4% with Heart Failure, 11% with cerebrovascular events and 15.4% with chronic kidney failure. The ACS was categorized as ST elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in 43.9%, non- STEMI (NSTEMI) in 45.8%, and unstable angina (UA) in 2%. Two hundred and sixty-eight (268), 37.8% of the cohort, were submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mainly due to STEMI (68.3%). This cohort were composed of patients with less comorbidities (statistically significant less valvular heart disease, heart failure, peripherical artery disease and dementia although more oncological diseases). There was no difference in the severity of ACS, as categorized by the Kilip Kimbal (KK) classification, mechanical complication or depressed ejection fraction between the 2 groups. (p&gt;0.05 for all) There was a statistically significant increase of advanced atrioventricular block (10.6 vs 4.4%; p 0.002; Logistic regression OR 3.12; IC95 [1.37–7.15], p 0.007) and major bleeding (1.8 vs 5.5%; p 0.008; Logistic regression OR 3.36; IC95 [1.36–8.32] p 0.009) in the PCI group. There was no difference in in-hospital re-infarction, cardiac arrest, stroke or death. (p&gt;0.05 for all) The follow up at 1 year was performed in two hundred and fifty-six (256) patients, 30.9% submitted to PCI. Although the survival analysis demonstrated a trend towards improvement in 1-year survival and cardiovascular readmissions in the intervention group, it did not reach statistical significance. (p&gt;0.05 for all) Conclusions PCI was performed in about a third of nonagenarians presenting with ACS. Our cohort demonstrated a greater rate of in-hospital complications without a significant in-hospital or at 1 year clinical benefit. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document