scholarly journals 'Any and every cure for COVID-19': an imminent epidemic of alternative remedies amidst the pandemic?

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ejemai Amaize Eboreime ◽  
Chinwe Juliana Iwu ◽  
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Romero ◽  
Balaji Goparaju ◽  
Kathryn Russo ◽  
M. Brandon Westover ◽  
Matt Bianchi

Obiter ◽  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya P Singh

The rapid rise in the use of social media networking sites in South Africa has posed new challenges to our courts. The law of defamation and privacy, which has long been considered well established, is now facing new demands on its boundaries because of the unique characteristics of social media in the online era.This note will discuss and critique three recent cases individually, concerning issues arising from the use of Facebook (a social media website) and the approach of the courts in extending the traditional law to the new demands of social media interaction.The aim of the note is to evaluate: the considerations which should apply to the granting of an interdict in respect of comments posted on Facebook, especially where alternative remedies are available; whether social media should be treated differently from electronic news media; how to establish ownership of a Facebook profile where such ownership is disputed; liability for anonymous defamatory posts on an individual’s Facebook profile; whether an individual can be liable for defamatory posts not made by himself personally, but in which he has been tagged; whether comments posed as questions can be regarded as defamatory; and the role played by apologies in claims for damages in defamation.The note concludes by discussing how South African courts have extended the traditional principles governing the actio injuriarium action in South African law – to the new challenges posed by the rise in popularity of social media networking sites.


1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair Wood ◽  
Marius Rademaker ◽  
Amanda Oakley ◽  
Janelle Wallace
Keyword(s):  

Legal Studies ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary KY Chan

This paper examines fundamental issues concerning a corporation's right to sue for defamatory attacks on its reputation, the scope of the right and the remedies available. It first outlines the opposed positions in England and Australia, respectively. It also argues that a corporation, save for a government corporation that exercises governmental functions based on markedly different rationales, should have the right to sue in defamation premised on the concept of corporate reputation as property and for the purpose of vindicating its reputation. On the question of remedies, a corporation should be entitled to recover special damages as reparation for damage to reputation provided they are proved. This paper considers, instead of presumed damages, alternative remedies for vindicating corporate reputation. Finally, it examines the business and non-business reputations of both trading and non-trading corporations in relation to claims for damages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document