Local Anesthetic Injections for the Short-Term Treatment of Head and Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Nouged ◽  
Jawdat Dajani ◽  
Bon Ku ◽  
Kamal Al-Eryani ◽  
Mariela Padilla ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Vanti ◽  
Lucia Bertozzi ◽  
Ivan Gardenghi ◽  
Francesca Turoni ◽  
Andrew A. Guccione ◽  
...  

Background Taping is a widely used therapeutic tool for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, nevertheless its effectiveness is still uncertain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to conduct a current review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effects of elastic and nonelastic taping on spinal pain and disability. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched. Study Selection All published RCTs on symptomatic adults with a diagnosis of specific or nonspecific spinal pain, myofascial pain syndrome, or whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) were considered. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the results. The quality of individual studies was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Data Synthesis Eight RCTs were included. Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs on low back pain demonstrated that elastic taping does not significantly reduce pain or disability immediately posttreatment, with a standardized mean difference of −0.31 (95% confidence interval=−0.64, 0.02) and −0.23 (95% confidence interval=−0.49, 0.03), respectively. Results from single trials indicated that both elastic and nonelastic taping are not better than placebo or no treatment on spinal disability. Positive results were found only for elastic taping and only for short-term pain reduction in WAD or specific neck pain. Generally, the effect sizes were very small or not clinically relevant, and all results were supported by low-quality evidence. Limitations The paucity of studies does not permit us to draw any final conclusions. Conclusion Although different types of taping were investigated, the results of this systematic review did not show any firm support for their effectiveness.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Carlos Stefano ◽  
Josué Bacaltchuk ◽  
Sérgio Luís Blay ◽  
José Carlos Appolinário

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayeh Ehsani ◽  
Brian Nebbe ◽  
David Normando ◽  
Manuel O. Lagravere ◽  
Carlos Flores-Mir

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 545-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Xia ◽  
Xiaoju Wang ◽  
Qiang Lin ◽  
Kai Cheng ◽  
Xueping Li

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Wook Hong ◽  
Jaeyoung Chun ◽  
Sunmin Park ◽  
Hyun Jung Lee ◽  
Jong Pil Im ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 861-862
Author(s):  
Lin Liu ◽  
Jiao Lu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Juan Wei ◽  
Xue-Feng Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Mansour Alotaibi ◽  
Abdulraouf Ayoub ◽  
Theodore King ◽  
Shadab Uddin

Background: Myofascial Pain Syndrome is a condition causing pain at myofascial trigger points. Kinesio Taping has been widely used to decrease pain and improve range of motion. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic programs that include kinesio taping on reducing myofascial pain syndrome symptoms. Methods: Independent research was performed for legit studies using the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORT Discus, EM base, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from February 2017 to March 2017. The keywords were “keniso tape myofascial” AND “taping myofascial” AND “myofascial pain Syndrome” AND “myofascial trigger points.” The research resulted in 5,793 articles that eventually included 6 articles that had met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data extracted data from the articles was about the pain severity, and was measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: The collected data was pooled from the results of 256 subjects (199 females and 57 males). Using KT showed improvement but not significant statistically in three of the analyzed studies, and the remaining three studies showed a statistical significant reduction in VAS score. The overall P value that computed by the European Scientific Journal February 2018 edition Vol.14, No.6 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 337 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0 software was statistically significant (P value= 0.001) between the KT group and the control group. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on six studies in regarding to the efficacy of KT on the myofascial pain in the upper trapezius muscle. The meta-analysis suggests KT with other therapeutic protocols to treat myofascial pain syndrome and increase cervical range of motion as well as the functional activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document